Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 122 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saeidi Ghahe A, Shahedi B, Kheirabadi G R, Tarrahi M J. Comparing Depression Scores in Different Types of Housing and Residential Floors in the Residents of Isfahan City, Iran. MEJDS 2023; 13 :122-122
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2806-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Psychiatry Department, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4- Associate Professor in Epidemiology, Epidemiology & Biostatistics Department, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (793 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The impact of living in an inappropriate residence is evident in causing mental health issues like depression and other mental disorders, as well as its complications on the individual and social aspects of the people. It seems necessary to investigate the relationships between types of residence, floors, number of units on each floor, and depression. Also, people spend most of their time at their homes. In addition, it is crucial to pay attention to the residential spaces and their effects on mental health with respect to the unwanted attendance of people at their homes due to special situations like the coronavirus outbreak, which makes the houses multifunctional. Analyzing this relationship and concentrating on it by architects while designing procedures can elevate residential desirability toward reducing depression. Considering the significance of housing desirability for improving mental health and preventing mental disorders or complications like depression (due to its high occurrence), this research aims to explore the relationship between the type of housing, floor, and depression rate in residential environments of Isfahan City, Iran.
Methods: The current study is descriptive–correlational, and the statistical population consists of all residents of 15 municipality districts of Isfahan City. So, 320 residential units were selected for investigation using a random cluster sampling method. The exclusion criteria were as follows: not answering all questions in the questionnaire and living less than one year in the unit, as the features of the residential place exhibit after one year of living in that area.Lovibond Depression Questionnaire (1995) was applied to collect data. In the following, the type of housing, floors, and number of units on each floor, along with other residential environment characteristics, were asked and investigated. Also, at least two completed questionnaires were received from each residential unit. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data. The Cronbach alpha index, composite reliability, and convergent validity were obtained at 0.974, 0.975, and 0.662 for depression variables, respectively. It should be noted that 0.05 was considered the significance level for all tests.
Results: Concerning the Kruskal–Wallis results, there were significant differences between depression scores based on the four types of residence: housing, apartments up to 3 floors, apartments between 3 to 9 floors, and apartments more than 10 floors (p< 0.001). A significant difference was seen between the mean depression scores of paired housing, apartments up to 3 floors, apartments between 3 to 9 floors, and apartments more than 10 floors groups (p< 0.05). So, it can be said that the people’s depression scores have significant differences regarding the apartments with more than 10 floors, and the people in these apartments are more depressed than others (p<0.001). The depression scores of people who lived on the fifth or upper floors were significantly higher than other groups, and people who lived there were more depressed. Also, there were significant differences between 5 groups of one unit, two units, three units, four units, and five or more units regarding the mean depression scores (p<0.001). The depression score of people living in five or more units on every floor was significantly different from other groups, and people who lived there were more depressed. Also, the number of units at each floor variable and average depression score were different among various groups (p<0.001). Residents of large houses were expected to gain lower depression scores than those who lived in apartment buildings, but the research did not approve of that.
Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between the residential floor, the number of units on each floor, and depression score. The results of this research can be used in designing residential environments to prevent depression or avoid its complications.

Full-Text [PDF 508 kb]   (195 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Greif MJ, Nii–Amoo Dodoo F. How community physical, structural, and social stressors relate to mental health in the urban slums of Accra, Ghana. Health Place. 2015; 33: 57–66. [DOI]
2. Naeimi Frotanineja F, Rahbari Manesh K, Alborzi F, Khansari S. Architectural analysis of residential complexes based on physical components affecting the inhabitants’ mental health: a case study. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:174. [Persian] [Article]
3. Qiu QW, Li J, Li JY, Xu Y. Built form and depression among the Chinese rural elderly: a cross–sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e038572. [DOI]
4. Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–59. [DOI]
5. Torres Toda M, Anabitarte Riol A, Cirach M, Estarlich M, Fernández–Somoano A, González–Safont L, et al. Residential surrounding greenspace and mental health in three Spanish areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5670. [DOI]
6. Heidari AA, Tavakol H, Behdadfar N. Effect of Lighting and space on depression and stress appearing in residential places. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences. 2013; 12: 733–41.
7. Reeves WC, Lin JMS, Nater UM. Mental illness in metropolitan, urban and rural Georgia populations. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:414. [DOI]
8. Bernard JER. Depression: a review of its definition. MOJ Addict Med Ther. 2018;5(1):6–7. [DOI]
9. National Institute of Mental Health . Depression what you need to know. 2015. [Article]
10. Blair A, Ross NA, Gariepy G, Schmitz N. How do neighborhoods affect depression outcomes? a realist review and a call for the examination of causal pathways. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(6):873–87. [DOI]
11. Cutrona CE, Wallace G, Wesner KA. Neighborhood characteristics and depression: an examination of stress processes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15(4):188–92. [DOI]
12. Guite HF, Clark C, Ackrill G. The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental well-being. Public Health. 2006;120(12):1117–26. [DOI]
13. Pan H, Liu Y, Chen Y. The health effect of perceived built environment on depression of elderly people in rural China: moderation by income. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29(1):185–93. [DOI]
14. Stathi A, Gilbert H, Fox KR, Coulson J, Davis M, Thompson JL. Determinants of neighborhood activity of adults age 70 and over: a mixed–methods study. J Aging Phys Act. 2012;20(2):148–70. [DOI]
15. Loomans T. 7 reasons why high-rises kill livability [Internet]. Blooming Rock [cited 2023]. Available from: [Article]
16. Taske N, Taylor L, Mulvihill C, Doyle N, Goodrich J, Killoran A. Housing and public health: a review of reviews of interventions for improving health. Evidence briefing. UK, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2005.
17. Wells NM, Rollings KA, Ong AD, Reid MC. Nearby nature buffers the pain catastrophizing - pain intensity relation among urban residents with chronic pain. Front Built Environ. 2019;5:142. [DOI]
18. Evans GW, Cohen S. Environmental stress and health. In: Baum A, Revenson TA, Singer JE. Handbook of health psychology. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
19. Panczak R, Galobardes B, Spoerri A, Zwahlen M, Egger M. High life in the sky? Mortality by floor of residence in Switzerland. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(6):453–62. [DOI]
20. Seo JK. Housing policy and urban sustainable development: evaluating the process of high–rise apartment development in Korea. Urban Policy and Research. 2016;34(4):330–42. [DOI]
21. Larcombe DL, van Etten E, Logan A, Prescott SL, Horwitz P. High–rise apartments and urban mental health–historical and contemporary views. Challenges. 2019;10(2):34. [DOI]
22. Hannay DR. Mental health and high flats. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1981;34(9):431–2. [DOI]
23. Gillis AR. High–rise housing and psychological strain. J Health Soc Behav. 1977;18(4):418–31.
24. Galea S, Ahern J, Rudenstine S, Wallace Z, Vlahov D. Urban built environment and depression: a multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(10):822–7. [DOI]
25. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43. [DOI]
26. Sahebi A, Asghari MJ, Salari RS. Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS–21) for an Iranian population. Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2005;1(4):36–54. [Persian] [Article]
27. Evans GW, Wells NM, Moch A. Housing and mental health: a review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues. 2003;59(3):475–500. [DOI]
28. Ochodo C, Ndetei DM, Moturi WN, Otieno JO. External built residential environment characteristics that affect mental health of adults. J Urban Health. 2014;91(5):908–27. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb