Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 81 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghadiri M, Azizi M, Saeidmanesh M. Predicting Self-harm Behavior Based on Sense of Ego Strength and Clinical Personality Patterns in Adolescents with Self-injury Disorder. MEJDS 2023; 13 :81-81
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2809-en.html
1- MA in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran
2- PhD student in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (1123 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Adolescence is the most appropriate period for personality formation in developmental psychology. One of the effective factors in the emergence of self–injury behaviors is the Ego. It refers to the second personality structure in Freud's theory, created by the forces in the Id. Ego functions include communication with reality, regulation, and control of instinctual forces, object relations, thought processing, defense functions, and combination and judgment functions. Another effective factor in self–injury behavior is personality. It is roughly the unique style of a human being in matching with the environment, which is somewhat different from other people's styles. By examining the Ego variable and clinical personality patterns, it is possible to identify teenagers prone to self–harm behaviors and prevent them by appropriate psychological interventions. Therefore, this research aims to predict self–harm behavior based on the sense of Ego strength and clinical personality patterns in adolescents with self–harm disorder.
Methods: The method of the present study was descriptive–correlational according to the nature of the study subject and the intended objectives. The study population comprised all adolescents living in Yazd City, Iran, in 2021. The participants were selected by available sampling, and the sample size was calculated as 100. In this research, according to the study topic, the required information about the theoretical foundations of the variables has been collected using the library and field methods. The inclusion criteria were as follows: the subject was between 14 and 18 years old, motivated to enter the research, and had a history of self–injury. The exclusion criterion was not completing the questionnaires. The study data were collected via the Inventory of Statements about Self–injury (ISAS) (Klonsky & Glenn, 2009), Psychosocial Inventory Ego Strengths (Markstrom et al., 1997), and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III (MCMI–III) (Millon, 1994). To analyze the data at the level of descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation, and at the level of inferential statistics, the Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis were used in SPSS version 24. The significance level of the tests was set at 0.05.
Results: Strong sense of Ego could predict self–injury behavior (p=0.002, β=0.226). Also, personalities of schizoid (p=0.001, β=0.310), avoidant (p=0.011, β=0.655), depressed (p<0.001, β=0.572), dependent (p=0.031, β=0.154), dramatic (p=0.042, β=0.426), narcissistic (p=0.022, β=0.614), antisocial (p=0.002, β=0.431), negativity (p=0.010, β=0.423), other harassment (p=0.005, β=0.218), self–harm (p<0.001, β=0.648), obsessive (p=0.038, β=0.129), paranoid (p=0.024, β=0.408), and borderline (p<0.001, β=0.519) could predict self–injury behaviors in adolescents.
Conclusion: According to the research findings on the predictive role of clinical personality patterns and the strong sense of Ego in the self–harm behavior of adolescents, we recommend that experts pay attention to these issues to prevent and treat self–harm behavior in adolescents.

Full-Text [PDF 582 kb]   (538 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Sahasrabudhe SA, Silamongkol T, Park YW, Colette A, Eberly LE, Klimes-Dougan B, et al. Identifying biological signatures of n-acetylcysteine for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents and young adults. J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2021;6:e210007. [DOI]
2. Memon A, Sharma S, Mohite S, Jain S. The role of online social networking on deliberate self-harm and suicidality in adolescents: a systematized review of literature. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018;60(4):384. [DOI]
3. Howe-Martin LS, Murrell AR, Guarnaccia CA. Repetitive nonsuicidal self-injury as experiential avoidance among a community sample of adolescents: nonsuicidal self-injury as experiential avoidance. J Clin Psychol. 2012;68(7):809–29. [DOI]
4. Clarke S, Allerhand LA, Berk MS. Recent advances in understanding and managing self-harm in adolescents. F1000Res. 2019;8:1794. [DOI]
5. Iskric A, Ceniti AK, Bergmans Y, McInerney S, Rizvi SJ. Alexithymia and self-harm: a review of nonsuicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112920. [DOI]
6. Marchant A, Hawton K, Stewart A, Montgomery P, Singaravelu V, Lloyd K, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: the good, the bad and the unknown. Plos One. 2017;12(8):e0181722. [DOI]
7. Widakowich C. The manic depressive disease: psychodynamic aspects and affective syntony. Vertex. 2014;25(117):338–43.
8. Holmboe RD. Anna Freud's loom. Int J Psychoanal. 2021;102(5):932–49. [DOI]
9. Lee JY, Lee Y ae, Yoo MS. Development of the Child's Ego Strength Scale: an observation-based assessment of the board game behaviors in play therapy in Korea. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021;15(1):20. [DOI]
10. Messina I, Scottà F, Marchi A, Benelli E, Grecucci A, Sambin M. Case report: individualization of intensive transactional analysis psychotherapy on the basis of ego strength. Front Psychol. 2021;12:618762. [DOI]
11. Higgins ET. Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Rev. 1987;94(3):319-40. [DOI]
12. Brody S, Carson CM. Brief report: self‐harm is associated with immature defense mechanisms but not substance use in a nonclinical Scottish adolescent sample. J Adolesc. 2012;35(3):765–7. [DOI]
13. Oltmanns JR, Jackson JJ, Oltmanns TF. Personality change: longitudinal self-other agreement and convergence with retrospective-reports. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020;118(5):1065–79. [DOI]
14. Kerber A, Roth M, Herzberg PY. Personality types revisited–a literature-informed and data-driven approach to an integration of prototypical and dimensional constructs of personality description. Plos One. 2021;16(1):e0244849. [DOI]
15. Maxwell SE. Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychol Methods. 2000;5(4):434–58. [DOI]
16. Klonsky ED, Glenn CR. Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: psychometric properties of the inventory of statements about self-injury (ISAS). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009;31(3):215–9. [DOI]
17. Saffarinia M, Nikoogoftar M, Damavandian A. The effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) on reducing self-harming behaviors in juvenile offenders in Tehran's juvenile correction and rehabilitation centre. Journal of Clinical Psychology Studies. 2015;4(15):141–58. [Persian] [Article]
18. Markstrom CA, Sabino VM, Turner BJ, Berman RC. The psychosocial inventory of ego strengths: development and validation of a new Eriksonian measure. J Youth Adolesc. 1997;26(6):705–32. [DOI]
19. Markstrom CA, Marshall SK. The psychosocial inventory of ego strengths: examination of theory and psychometric properties. J Adolesc. 2007;30(1):63–79. [DOI]
20. Parviz K, Aghamouhamadian Sharbaf H, Ghanbarihashemabadi B, Dehghani M. The relationship between ego strength and metacognition among male and female students. Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2016;9(2):118–26. [Persian] [Article]
21. Millon T, Davis RD. The MCMI--III: present and future directions. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(1):69–85. [DOI]
22. Millon T. Millon Index of Personality Styles, Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1994.
23. Sharifi A, Molavi H, Namdari K. Revayi tashkhisi azmoon balini chand mehvari millon-3 [The validity of MCMI-III (Millon, 1994) Scales]. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology. 2007;9(34):27–38. [Persian]
24. Rahmani F, Kiani MA, Rezaie F, Nasuri M, Arasteh M. Personality, intellectual and emotional state of patients with borderline personality disorder. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. 2013;18(3):1–12. [Persian] [Article]
25. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality in adulthood: a five factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
26. Fritsch S, Donaldson D, Spirito A, Plummer B. Personality characteristics of adolescent suicide attempters. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1999;30(4):219–35. [DOI]
27. Jiao XY, Xu CZ, Chen Y, Peng QL, Ran HL, Che YS, Fang D, Peng JW, Chen L, Wang SF, Xiao YY. Personality traits and self-harm behaviors among Chinese children and adolescents: The mediating effect of psychological resilience. World J Psychiatry. 2022;12(3):494-504. [DOI]
28. Dorahy MJ, Carrell JM, Thompson N. Assessing the validity of the quartile risk model of dissociation for predicting deliberate self-harm. J Trauma. 2019;20(5):548–63. [DOI]
29. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, Begum N, Saini A, Wang S, et al. Suicide, self-harm and thoughts of suicide or self-harm in infectious disease epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis–CORRIGENDUM. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021;30:e41. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb