Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 173 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.TABRIZ.REC.1400.022

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hakimi N, Aghdasi A, Sahebi A, HosseiniNasab S D. Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Group-Based Positive Approach on Marital Conflicts in Women with Multiple Sclerosis. MEJDS 2023; 13 :173-173
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3241-en.html
Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Group-Based Positive Approach on Marital Conflicts in Women with Multiple Sclerosis
Noushin Hakimi1 , Alinaghi Aghdasi *2 , Ali Sahebi3 , Seyyed Davood HosseiniNasab4
1- PhD student in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Assistant Professor in Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3- William Glaser Institiue
4- Professor in Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (749 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurocognitive disorder among middle–aged individuals and a chronic, progressive disease of the central nervous system that negatively affects various aspects of relationships, including sexual relationships. Constandinidis et al. (2019) found a relationship between MS, marital conflicts, and sexual dysfunction. Marital conflict refers to physical and verbal/psychological aggression between spouses. Reality therapy and choice theory are popular options for couple therapy, aiming to increase sexual satisfaction and reduce sexual conflicts. Another potentially effective treatment for marital conflicts is acceptance and commitment therapy, which helps individuals by increasing psychological flexibility and mindfulness, clarifying values, breaking free from unhelpful thoughts, and engaging in intelligent actions. According to some studies, positive behavior therapy, which Seligman and colleagues developed, is another treatment that has been effective in reducing some components of marital conflict. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of reality therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and positivist approach in a group manner on marital conflicts in female patients with multiple sclerosis living in Hamadan City, Iran.
Methods: The current quasi–experimental research employed a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The study's statistical population included all women with multiple sclerosis living in Hamadan in 2020. Of these, 63 were selected using available sampling and randomly assigned to three experimental groups (reality therapy with 16 people, acceptance and commitment therapy with 15 people, and positivist approach with 15 people) and a control group with 17 people. The therapy program consisted of one 90–minute weekly session in 8 sessions for three experimental groups (one therapeutic intervention for each group). In the case of the control group, there was no intervention at that time. In addition, the present study used the Marital Conflict Questionnaire (Sanayi Zaker et al., 1992) to collect information. The questionnaire has 54 questions scored on a 5–point scale from 1 to 5. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were confirmed by calculating the Cronbach alpha equal to 0.96. Analysis of the research data was done using the analysis of the covariance using SPSS–25 software.
Results: Univariate analysis of covariance after adjusting pretest score showed significant differences between MS women participating in reality therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and positive approach regarding the average posttest scores of marital conflicts (p<0.001) with the effect size of 0.526. Based on the Bonferroni post hoc test results, the average posttest scores of marital conflicts in the reality therapy group (p<0.001), acceptance and commitment therapy group (p<0.001), and positive approach group (p<0.001) were significantly lower than the control group. Also, the average scores of marital conflicts in the reality therapy group (p<0.031) and acceptance and commitment therapy group (p<0.001) were significantly lower than those in the positive approach group (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the reality therapy group and the acceptance and commitment therapy group. All three interventions of reality therapy, acceptance and commitment, and positive approach therapies were significantly effective in reducing the marital conflicts of MS women. In addition, no difference was observed between the effectiveness of reality therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy.
Conclusions: Comparing the efficacy of three intervention approaches showed that all three treatment methods effectively reduced marital conflicts. However, acceptance and commitment therapy was more effective than the other two interventions. Therefore, we suggest that all three methods of reality therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and the positivist approach can be used to reduce marital conflicts. Of course, based on the results of the present study, it is better to use acceptance and commitment therapy as the first choice of therapists.

Keywords: Reality therapy, Acceptance and commitment therapy, Positive approach, Marital conflicts, Multiple sclerosis
Full-Text [PDF 347 kb]   (572 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology
References
1. Hajric S, Serdarevic A, Sulejmanpasic G, Suljic E. Influence of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on sexual function domains of health related quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients. Mater Sociomed. 2022;34(3):188. [DOI]
2. Tavakoli Saleh S, Ebrahimi ME. Effectivenes of acceptance-commitment therapy on the resillience and psycological well-being of female patients with multiple sclerosis in Hamadan, Iran. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2021;28(2):126–33. [Persian] [DOI]
3. Konstantinidis C, Tzitzika M, Bantis A, Nikolia A, Samarinas M, Kratiras Z, et al. Female sexual dysfunction among greek women with multiple sclerosis: correlations with organic and psychological factors. Sex Med. 2019;7(1):19–25. [DOI]
4. El-Sheikh M, Shimizu M, Erath SA, Philbrook LE, Hinnant JB. Dynamic patterns of marital conflict: relations to trajectories of adolescent adjustment. Dev Psychol. 2019;55(8):1720–32. [DOI]
5. Afshari E, Ebrahimi MI, Haddadi A. The effect of acceptance and commitment group therapy on emotional divorce and self-efficacy of working couples. Journal of Community Health Research. 2022;11(4):327–36. [Peesian] [DOI]
6. Koleshtajani E, Zabihi R, Yekta M. The effectiveness of reality therapy on sexual satisfaction and marital intimacy of infertile women. J Edu Health Promot. 2022;11(1):275. [DOI]
7. Yoysefikia M, Khoshkonesh A, Falahzadeh H. The effectiveness of reality therapy to decrease the marital conflict and despair in women with multiple sclerosis. Armaghane Danesh. 2018;23:364–77. [Persian] [Article]
8. Wubbolding RE. Reality therapy for the 21st century. Routledge; 2000.
9. Amani A, Isanejad O, Alipour E. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment group therapy on marital distress, marital conflict and optimism in married women visited the counseling center of Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation in Kermanshah. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2018;5(1):42–64. [Persian] [DOI]
10. Haddadi A, Yazdi-Ravandi S, Moradi A, Hajaghaie E. Comparing the resilience of the medical staff during the covid-19 pandemic after yalom group psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment group therapy. Journal of Research & Health. 2023;13(3):227–36. [Persian] [DOI]
11. 1. Yaghoobi H, Toozandehjani H, Zendedel A. Comparison of the effectiveness of emotion – focused therapy and acceptance – commitment therapy on self – compassion in women with marital conflict. North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2021;13(3):113–22. [Persian] [DOI]
12. Thompson B, Moghaddam N, Evangelou N, Baufeldt A, Das Nair R. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for improving quality of life and mood in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;63:103862. [DOI]
13. Antoine P, Andreotti E, Congard A. Positive psychology intervention for couples: a pilot study. Stress Health. 2020;36(2):179–90. [DOI]
14. Didani R, Tabrizi M, Mardani Rad M, Karami A. Comparison of positive therapy and logo-therapy efficacy on positive feelings toward spouse and marital conflicts in married women. Positive Psychology Research. 2020;6(1):83–98. [Persian] [Article]
15. Rahimi-Kazerouni N, Karami A. Investigating the effectiveness of positive psychology on marital intimacy and mental vitality in women with conflict with their husbands, referring to counseling centers in Shiraz. The Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences. 2019;4(35):39–55. [Persian]
16. Jafarimanesh M, Zahrakar K, Taghvaei D, Pirani Z. The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on marital burnout in couples with marital conflicts. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2021;18(4):435–46. [Persian] [Article]
17. Glasser W, Breggin P. Reality therapy in action. Harper Collins Publishers; 1999.
18. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25. [DOI]
19. Ahmadi SA, Vaziri S, Ahi G, Lotfi Kashani F, Akbari ME. Comparing the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy and spiritual therapy on psychological distress in patients with breast cancer. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2021;11:36. [Persian] [Article]
20. Seligman MEP, Rashid T, Parks AC. Positive psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2006;61(8):774–88. [DOI]
21. Boniwell I. Ravan shenasi mosbat dar yek negah (elm shadkami0 [Positive psychology at a glance (the science of happiness)]. Rezakhani SD, Pasha Sharifi H. (Persian translator). Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2019.
22. Azad Yekta M. A review of recent psychological perspectives and treatments. Journal of Excellence in counseling and Psychotherapy. 2020;8(32):1–14. [Persian] [Article]
23. Glasser W. Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom: Harper Collins Pub; 1999.
24. Ruiz FJ. A review of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy. 2010;10:125–62.
25. Engle JL, Follette VM. An experimental comparison of two acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) values exercises to increase values-oriented behavior. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2018;10:31–40. [DOI]
26. Keyes CLM, Fredrickson BL, Park N. Positive psychology and the quality of life. In: Land KC, Michalos AC, Sirgy MJ; editors. Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012. [DOI]
27. Seligman ME. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Atria: Reprint edition; 2012.
28. Farahanifar M, Heidari H, Davodi H, Aleyasin SA. The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on the conflict resolution styles of incompatible marital women. International Archives of Health Sciences. 2019;6(2):101-7. Available from: [Article]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb