Volume 8 -
MEJDS (2018) 8: 81 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Simaee S, Tasbihsazan S R. Forecasting of Self-Control with Social Skills and Emotion Regulation in Students with Physical Impairment. MEJDS 2018; 8 :81-81
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1270-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1270-en.html
1- Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (3069 Views)
Background & Objective: Disability has been a social phenomenon since past times in societies; As regards the recognition of the existence and social relations, it has always been a significant problem. So there was no constant relationship between the social and scientific development of humanity on the one hand and the social status of persons with disabilities, on the other side. Disability of any kind may lead to psychological and behavioral crises. Disregard for these issues sometimes creates many problems for people with disabilities. Among disabilities, a physical type is a movement that External and Turner defined physical and motor disabilities as an injury that limits one or more of one of the significant activities of the individual's life. The aim of this study was the Forecasting of Self-Control with Social Skills and Emotion Regulation in Students with Physical Impairment.
Methods: The research method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population consisted of all students with disabilities in boys and girls in the second grade of high school in Urmia. Sampling method was used to select 108 students. Measurement tool for social sensitivity scales was Mattson (1983), Guarenfsky's Emotion Control Questionnaire, Kareije and Spinhaun (2001), Weinberger and Schwartz (1990) Self-Control Scale. Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression were used to analyze the data and Using SPSS software at a significant level of 5%.
Results: Findings showed that the relationship with peers (p=0.04, β=0.18) and proper social skills (p=0.01, β=0.22) was positive and significant on Self-Control. The effect of aggression (p=0.001, β=-0.33) and non-social behaviors (p=0.04, β=-0.19) on negative self-parity is significant, and finally, the impact of rumination on negative Self-Control was significant (p=0.001, β=-0.38). There was a direct correlation between dimensions of social skills, two dimensions of the relationship with peers and appropriate social behaviors with self-restraint of students with physical disabilities and two aspects of aggression and financial behaviors have an inverse relationship with self-restraint. Also, from all aspects of emotional regulation, only ruminal thinking was able to explain the changes in the self-reliance of students with physical disabilities.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that in general, social skills and emotional regulation of students with physical disabilities play an important role in self-reliance. Therefore, to increase the efficiency of physical disabilities, interventions that improve social skills, emotional regulation, are recommended.
Methods: The research method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population consisted of all students with disabilities in boys and girls in the second grade of high school in Urmia. Sampling method was used to select 108 students. Measurement tool for social sensitivity scales was Mattson (1983), Guarenfsky's Emotion Control Questionnaire, Kareije and Spinhaun (2001), Weinberger and Schwartz (1990) Self-Control Scale. Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression were used to analyze the data and Using SPSS software at a significant level of 5%.
Results: Findings showed that the relationship with peers (p=0.04, β=0.18) and proper social skills (p=0.01, β=0.22) was positive and significant on Self-Control. The effect of aggression (p=0.001, β=-0.33) and non-social behaviors (p=0.04, β=-0.19) on negative self-parity is significant, and finally, the impact of rumination on negative Self-Control was significant (p=0.001, β=-0.38). There was a direct correlation between dimensions of social skills, two dimensions of the relationship with peers and appropriate social behaviors with self-restraint of students with physical disabilities and two aspects of aggression and financial behaviors have an inverse relationship with self-restraint. Also, from all aspects of emotional regulation, only ruminal thinking was able to explain the changes in the self-reliance of students with physical disabilities.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that in general, social skills and emotional regulation of students with physical disabilities play an important role in self-reliance. Therefore, to increase the efficiency of physical disabilities, interventions that improve social skills, emotional regulation, are recommended.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Ghasemi A, Momeni M, Khankeh H. Comparing the physical image of the athlete with disabilities and the non-athlete's non-athlete. JREHAB. 2010; 10 (4): 26-31. [Persian]
2. Molavi H, Torkan H, Soltani E, Palahang H. Standardization and Measurement of Validity and Reliability of the Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire. IJPCP. 2010; 16 (3): 231-8. [Persian]
3. Ford JA, Blumenstein L. Self-control and substance use among college students. JDI. 2013; 43 (1): 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612462216
4. Aghajani MJ, Tizdast T, Gorbani M, Bajvar M. The Relationship between Psychological Hardiness and Nursing Burnout. JNMS. 2007; 23 (2): 1-7. [Persian]
5. Mara W, Ross DP, Keith W, Robin O. Linkages between children‘s social and academic competence: Longitudinal analysis. JSP. 2001; 39 (6): 463-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00084-X
6. Haghigi J, Mousavi M, Mehrabizadeh HM, Beshlideh K. The effect of life skills training on mental health and self-esteem of high school female students. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology. 2006;1: 61-78. [Persian]
7. Arndt JE, Fujiwara E. Interactions between Emotion Regulation and Mental Health. Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 1 (5): 1-8.
8. John P, Dennis J S, Vander W. The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2010; 34 (3): 241–53. DOI: 10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
9. Weinberg D. Of others inside: Insanity, addiction, and belonging in America. Temple University Press; 2005.
10. Gross, J. Handbook of emotion regulation. The Guilford Press; 2007.
11. Salehi A. Mazaheri Z. Aghajani Z. Jahanbazi B. The Role of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies in the Prediction of Depression. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2015; 16 (1) : 108-117. [Link]
12. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on psychological science. 2008;3(5):400-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x
13. Megreya MA. Emotional Intelligence and Criminal Behavior. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2014; 60 (1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12625
14. Yoosefi F. Investigating the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and social skills and anxiety in students of brilliant talents. Research on Exceptional Children. 2007; 6 (4): 871-92. [Persian]
15. Garnefski N, Rieffe C, Jellesma F, Terwogt MM, Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and emotional problems in 9–11-year-old children. European child & adolescent psychiatry. 2007 Feb 1;16(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0562-3
16. Besharat MA. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Instruction and Scoring. Developmental Pschology. Iranian Psychologists. 2017; 13 (50): 221-223. [Persian]
17. Weinberger DA, Schwartz GE. Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self‐reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of personality. 1990;58(2):381-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00235.x
18. Kohrazeei F. The relation of Family Functional with Self-regulation of Academic and Inhibition among high school students. Rooyesh E Ravanshenasi Journal. 2017 Jan 1;6(2):121-48.
19. Gibson C, Wright J. Low self-control and coworker delinquency: A research note. J Criminal Justice. 2001;29: 483-93.
20. Khodayari Fard M, Rahimi Nejhad A, Abedini Y. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Social Adjustment of Controlled and Non-Audit Students. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Shiraz. 2007; 26 (3): 25-42. [Persian]
21. Greshmam D, Gullone E. Emotion regulation strategy use in children and adolescents; the explanatory roles of personality and attachment. Personality and individual differences. 2012; 52: 616-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.016
22. Fowles DC. Electrodermal hyporeactivity and antisocial behavior: Does anxiety mediate the relationship? J Affect Disord. 2000; 61 (3): 177- 89.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
