Volume 11 - Articles-1400                   MEJDS (2021) 11: 43 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abooei A, Afshani S A, Fallah Yakhdani M, Ruhani A. A Grounded Exploration of Consequences of Physical and Financial Infertility Among Infertile Females. MEJDS 2021; 11 :43-43
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1576-en.html
1- Department of psychology, Azad University
2- Department of Sociology, Yazd University
3- Department of Counseling, Azad University
Abstract:   (2632 Views)
Background & Objectives: Infertility is a stressful life event and is currently considered a relatively frequent issue among couples. According to world statistics, a couple out of every 8 couples is struggling with infertility. Medical factors associated with infertility, such as diagnosis, the duration of child wish, the numbers of treatment cycles, the geographical and financial availability of different Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) interventions, as well as communication with physicians and nurses working in the reproductive medicine filed could be the basic elements in determining the experience of infertility. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the physical and financial aspects of infertility in infertile females.
Methods: The current study was conducted in Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute in Yazd City, Iran, in 2018–2019. The statistical population was all women who were diagnosed with primary infertility. The grounded theory research method was adopted, based on the research subject and purposes. Grounded theory was proposed by Glaser and Strauss (1967). The importance of this methodology, on one hand, is its capability in theorization, and on the other hand, is to create a space for analyzing qualitative data. The grounded theory is a qualitative approach in which the researcher proceeds to produce a general explanation (the theory) of a process, act, or interact, based on the viewpoint of a significant number of contributors. In this study, 21 females were selected and studied using a qualitative approach, grounded theory, and theoretical sampling. The sampling process continued until data saturation. Credibility in the present study was established through peer review, the research participants’ confirmation, and triangulation. Additionally, the registration of events and precise implementation of dependability has been established. The reflexivity technique was used in this study. Ethical considerations were also observed in this research. As outlined in the research sampling part, 21 participants were selected. The study participants (their infertility has been confirmed), were selected based on the theoretical and purposive sampling methods. The required data were collected and analyzed using the open and axial coding technique. For data collection, the interviews were recorded and consequently transcribed after several times of listening.
Results: The current research findings included 13 main categories, namely high medical expenses; travel expenses; the lack of facilities; stress and financial concerns; strategies for attracting financial resources; an inequality of income and expenses; treatment abandon; medications’ adverse effects; negative effects on the hair growth; skin complications; drug inefficacy; voracious appetite; body vulnerability; the adverse effects of aging, as well as a core phenomenon called the expenses of parenting. The causal conditions, i.e., the main cause of infertility were infertility disorders and medical expenses. The underlying conditions of this phenomenon were financial stress and worries as well as a lower social class. Infertile couples, especially women, encounter financial pressures due to infertility. Strategies used by infertile women to cope with the relevant costs of parenting were discontinuing treatment and strategies for obtaining financial resources.
Conclusion: According to the present study findings, financial problems, as well as the physical complications of infertility drugs, are among the consequences of infertility that most infertile women have to cope with. 
Full-Text [PDF 565 kb]   (496 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References
1. 1. te Velde ER, Pearson PL. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(2):141–54. [DOI]
2. 2. Wiersema NJ, Drukker AJ, Mai BTD, Giang HN, Nguyen TN, Lambalk CB. Consequences of infertility in developing countries: Results of a questionnaire and interview survey in the South of Vietnam. J Transl Med. 2006;4:54. [DOI]
3. 3. Kwete D, Binanga A, Mukaba T, Nemuandjare T, Mbadu MF, Kyungu M-T, et al. Family Planning in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Encouraging Momentum, Formidable Challenges. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(1):40–54. [DOI]
4. 4. Hardon A. Contesting contraceptive innovation--reinventing the script. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(3):614–27. [DOI]
5. 5. Chochovski J, Moss SA, Charman DP. Recovery after unsuccessful in vitro fertilization: the complex role of resilience and marital relationships. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;34(3):122–8. [DOI]
6. 6. Greil AL, McQuillan J, Shreffler KM, Johnson KM, Slauson-Blevins KS. Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility: stratified reproduction in a population-based sample of U.S. women. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(4):493–509. [DOI]
7. 7. McQuillan J, Greil AL, Scheffler KM, Tichenor V. The Importance of Motherhood among Women in the Contemporary United States. Gend Soc. 2008;22(4):477–96. [DOI]
8. 8. Guzzo KB, Hayford SR. Race-Ethnic Differences in Sexual Health Knowledge. Race Soc Probl. 2012;4(3–4):158–70. [DOI]
9. 9. Silva E, Simões S, Espírito-Santo H, Marques M, Lemos L. Mindfulness, self-compassion and spiritual well-being in chronic depression. European Psychiatry. 2016;33:S415. [DOI]
10. 10. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Economic aspects of infertility care: a challenge for researchers and clinicians. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(10):2243–8. [DOI]
11. 11. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine; 1967.
12. 12. Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Jalili H. (Persian translator). Tehran: Ney Publication; 2015.
13. 13. Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc; 2008.
14. 14. Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32(1):140–62. [DOI]
15. 15. Farland LV, Grodstein F, Srouji SS, Forman JP, Rich-Edwards J, Chavarro JE, et al. Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):391–7. [DOI]
16. 16. Nieuwenhuis SL, Odukogbe A-TA, Theobald S, Liu X. The impact of infertility on infertile men and women in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria: a qualitative study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2009;13(3):85–98.
17. 17. Widge A, Cleland J. The public sector’s role in infertility management in India. Health Policy and Planning. 2009;24(2):108–15. [DOI]
18. 18. Wu AK, Elliott P, Katz PP, Smith JF. Time costs of fertility care: the hidden hardship of building a family. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(7):2025–30. [DOI]
19. 19. Liu C. Restricting access to infertility services:what is a justified limitation on reproductive freedom? Minn J L Sci & Tech. 2009;10(1):291–324.
20. 20. Dyer SJ, Patel M. The economic impact of infertility on women in developing countries a systematic review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(2):102–9.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb