Study on the Effectiveness of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy and Gottman’s Cognitive-Systemic Couple Therapy on Balance of Affect in Conflicting Couples

Eslahi, Noushin; Arefi, Mokhtar; Alsadat Hoseini, Saeedeh; Amiri, Hasan

doi:10.29252/mejds.0.0.86

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 171 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/mejds.0.0.86

‎ 20.1001.1.23222840.1399.0.0.88.7

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Eslahi N, Arefi M, Alsadat Hoseini S, Amiri H. Study on the Effectiveness of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy and Gottman’s Cognitive-Systemic Couple Therapy on Balance of Affect in Conflicting Couples. MEJDS 2022; 12 :171-171
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1613-en.html

Study on the Effectiveness of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy and Gottman’s Cognitive-Systemic Couple Therapy on Balance of Affect in Conflicting Couples

Noushin Eslahi¹

, Mokhtar Arefi ^*¹

, Saeedeh Alsadat Hoseini¹

, Hasan Amiri¹

1- Department of Psychology and Consulting, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract: (3271 Views)

Background & Objectives: One of the disabilities and abnormalities of marriage that causes psychological problems, indifference and divorce are marital conflict and the inability to solve conflicts. Considering the role of emotion and emotions in marital life, and considering that Emotional couple therapy approach and Guttman cognitive–systemic couple therapy approach in recent years has been very effective in couple’s therapy, doing comparative research in this regard Determine the strengths and weaknesses of each one more than the other and determine the appropriate treatment for solving couples conflicts. According to researches, a research which compares the effectiveness of these two approaches in the field of balance of affect and harmony–marital dissonance has not been found. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine and compare the efficacy of emotionally focused couple therapy and Gottman's cognitive–systemic couple therapy was on the balance of affect of conflicting couples.
Methods: In this research, a semi–experimental design, pre–test and post–test design with two experimental and one control groups were used. The statistical population of this study was all contradictory and disadvantaged couples (Levels 1, 2 and 3) referring to counseling and private psychology centers in 2nd and 5th district of Tehran in 2019. From this community, 60 people were randomly selected and randomly assigned to three groups (20 subjects), Experimental groups 1 and 2 and control group. The criteria for subjects to enter the research were: informed consent to participate in the research; People with a history of 1–10 years of married life; having a marital conflict without legal and judicial action for separation and not being in the process of divorce and settlement and separation; No psychiatric disorder. The criteria for withdrawing the subjects from the research were unwillingness to continue participating in the research and legal action for divorce. In pretest and posttest, Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS) (Watson et al., 1988) was used for each of the three groups. The emotionally focused couple therapy sessions in seven sessions for Experimental group 1 and Gottman’s cognitive–systemic couple therapy in seven session sessions for experimental group 2 were performed, but no intervention was applied to the control group. Data analysis was done using covariance analysis to measure effectiveness and Bonferroni's post hoc test to check the two–by–two difference between the mean scores of the three groups in the post–test in SPSS version 23. The significance level of the tests was 0.05
Results: The results of covariance analysis showed that both groups of emotionally focused couple therapy and the Gottman’s cognitive–systemic couple therapy had a significant effect on the balance of affect (increase of positive affection and negative emotional loss) of conflicting couples (p<0.001). The results of Bonferroni test showed that the efficacy of emotionally focused couple therapy was more than the Gottman’s cognitive–systemic couple therapy (p<0.001).
Conclusion: According to the findings, the emotionally focused couple therapy based on Johnson's theory has a greater effect on couples' affect balance than Guttman's cognitive–systemic couple therapy. Therefore, the emotionally focused couple therapy can be used to increase the affect balance of couples.

Keywords: Couple therapy, Emotionally focused, Cognitive–systemic, Affect balance, Marital conflict

Full-Text [PDF 462 kb] (506 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References

1. Mbwirire J. Causes of marital conflicts in Christian marriages in Domboshawa area, Mashonaland East Province, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies. 2017:2(9):32–46.

2. Hawkins AJ, Willoughby BJ, Doherty WJ. Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2012;53(6):453–63. [DOI]

3. Rovenpor DR, Isbell LM. Do emotional control beliefs lead people to approach positive or negative situations? Two competing effects of control beliefs on emotional situation selection. Emotion. 2018;18(3):313–31. [DOI]

4. Watson M, Greer S. Development of a questionnaire measure of emotional control. J Psychosom Res. 1983;27(4):299–305. [DOI]

5. Watson D, Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):219–35. [DOI]

6. Johnson W, Krueger RF. How money buys happiness: genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;90(4):680–91. [DOI]

7. Izard CE. Translating emotion theory and research into preventive interventions. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(5):796–824. [DOI]

8. Lebow JL, Chambers AL, Christensen A, Johnson SM. Research on the treatment of couple distress. J Marital Fam Ther. 2012;38(1):145–68. [DOI]

9. Cano A, Corley AM, Clark SM, Martinez SC. A Couple-based psychological treatment for chronic pain and relationship distress. Cogn Behav Pract. 2018;25(1):119–34. [DOI]

10. Johnson SM. The contribution of emotionally focused couples therapy. J Contemp Psychother. 2007;37(1):47–52. [DOI]

11. Miller PJE, Caughlin JP, Huston TL. Trait expressiveness and marital satisfaction: the role of idealization processes. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2003;65(4):978–95. [DOI]

12. Sherma R. Task analytic examination of dominance in emotion focused couple therapy [Ph.D. dissertion]. [New York, USA]: New York University; 2007.

13. Madani Y, Gholamali Lavasani M. Proposing an integrated model of emotionally focused approach and gottman model and evaluating its effectiveness on feeling of loneliness in married women. Journal of Counseling Research. 2017;16(62):80–97. [Persian] [Article]

14. Gottman JM, Gottman JS, Atkins CL. The Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program: family skills component. Am Psychol. 2011;66(1):52–7. [DOI]

15. McCrady BS, Tonigan JS, Ladd BO, Hallgren KA, Pearson MR, Owens MD, et al. Alcohol behavioral couple therapy: in-session behavior, active ingredients and mechanisms of behavior change. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;99:139–48. [DOI]

16. Falahzade H, Sanai Zaker B, Farza V. A study on the effectiveness of emotionally focused couple therapy and integrated systemic couple therapy on reducing intimacy anxiety. Journal of Family Research. 2015;8(4):465–84. [Persian] [Article]

17. Havassi N, Zahrakar K, Mohsenzadeh F. A study on the efficacy of Gottman marital therapy as a group method in reduction of marital burnout. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2017;4(6):59–64. [Persian] [DOI]

18. Babaei Gharmkhani M, Rasouli M, Davarniya R. The effect of emotionally-focused couples therapy (EFCT) on reducing marital stress of married couples. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;18(56):56–69. [Persian] [Article]

19. Doss BD, Thum YM, Sevier M, Atkins DC, Christensen A. Improving relationships: mechanisms of change in couple therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(4):624–33. [DOI]

20. Tie S, Poulsen S. Emotionally focused couple therapy with couples facing terminal illness. Contemp Fam Ther. 2013;35(3):557–67. [DOI]

21. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;54(6):1063–70. [DOI]

22. Gharedaghi A, Komeylipour F. The effectiveness of positive cognitive behavioral therapy on the positive and negative affect of women with spouse with mental disorders. Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy, 2019;10(38):177-94. [Persian] [DOI]