The Effectiveness of Fernald's Multi-sensory Approach on Improving Dictation Disorder and Reading Problems in Students with Learning Disabilities

Pourkamali, Arina; Mohammadi, Akbar; Haghighat, Sara

doi:10.29252/mejds.0.0.130

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 52 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/mejds.0.0.130

‎ 20.1001.1.23222840.1399.0.0.137.6

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Pourkamali A, Mohammadi A, Haghighat S. The Effectiveness of Fernald's Multi-sensory Approach on Improving Dictation Disorder and Reading Problems in Students with Learning Disabilities. MEJDS 2022; 12 :52-52
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1772-en.html

The Effectiveness of Fernald's Multi-sensory Approach on Improving Dictation Disorder and Reading Problems in Students with Learning Disabilities

Arina Pourkamali¹

, Akbar Mohammadi ^*¹

, Sara Haghighat¹

1- Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch

Abstract: (2447 Views)

Background & Objectives: Learning disorders are the most common neurodevelopmental disorders. They have complex etiological aspects and individual variability. Learning disorder is a general term for a heterogeneous group of disorders manifested by significant problems in learning and using hearing, speaking, reading, writing, reasoning, or mathematical abilities. Reading disorder is undoubtedly one of the most important learning disorders. Characteristics of this disorder include the inability to recognize words accurately or express them fluently, or understand them. Along with reading problems, written speech problems are also found in most cases of learning disabilities. The process of transferring thoughts onto paper is called writing. Written expression is one of the most sophisticated skills needed to convey linguistic understanding and express thoughts and opinions. This research aimed to examine the effectiveness of Fernald's multi–sensory approach in improving dictation disorder and reading problems in students with learning disabilities.
Methods: The present research was an applied study in terms of purpose and a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest design and a control group in terms of methodology. The study population consisted of all sixth–grade male students with learning disabilities studying in elementary schools of Semnan City, Iran, during the academic year of 2018–2019. After identifying 20 students from the two sixth grade classes, we tested them with the Student Identification Checklist for Learning Disabilities in Spelling (Agha–Babaei et al., 2011) and then analyzed and interpreted the scores. Next, 14 volunteer samples were purposefully selected based on the inclusion criteria (having dictation disorder, lacking mental and physical disorders, providing parental consent to participate in the study, and commitment to adherence to group rules). Finally, they were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. The sample size for each group was seven. The experimental group participated in 10 training sessions based on Fernald's multi–sensory approach, and the control group did not receive any intervention. Research data were collected using the Student Identification Checklist for Learning Disabilities in Spelling (Agha–Babaei et al., 2011), Reading Level Diagnostic Test (Azizian & Abedi, 2006), and Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire (Willcutt et al., 2011). The collected data were analyzed at two levels of descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of covariance) in SPSS software version 25 at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: Findings showed that training sessions based on Fernald's multi–sensory approach could make a significant difference between two groups in dictation (p<0.005) and reading (p<0.005) variables. Based on the effect size, 79.4% of the change in dictation disorder scores and 48% of the change in reading difficulty scores were due to the intervention with Fernald's multi–sensory approach.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, Fernald's multi–sensory approach effectively improves dictation disorder and reading problems of students with learning disabilities. The findings emphasized the efficacy of this approach in improving the educational status of students with learning disabilities.

Keywords: Fernald's multi–sensory approach, Learning disorder, Dictation disorder, Reading problems

Full-Text [PDF 560 kb] (607 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013, pp:133–7.

2. Al–Yagon M, Margalit M. Social cognition of children and adolescents with LD: Intrapersonal and interpersonal perspectives. In: Swanson HL, Harris KR, Graham S, editors. Handbook of learning disabilities. New York, London: The Guilford Press; 2013, pp: 278–303.

3. Franklin BM. The first crusade for learning disabilities: the movement for the education of backward children. In: The Formation of School Subjects. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. pp:190–209.

4. Peterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. The Lancet. 2012;379(9830):1997–2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60198-6

5. Thakran S. Learning disabilities: Types and symptoms. International Journal of Applied Research. 2015;1(5):149–52.

6. Berninger VW, Abbott RD. Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. J Educ Psychol. 2010;102(3):635–51. [DOI]

7. Hooper SR, Swartz CW, Wakely MB, de Kruif REL, Montgomery JW. Executive functions in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. J Learn Disabil. 2002;35(1):57–68. [DOI]

8. Abdi A, Karami M, Hatami J. The efficacy of improving visual memory through play therapy on reducing spilling errors in dysgraphia student. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2012;8(4):648–58. [Persian]

9. Hendren RL, Haft SL, Black JM, White NC, Hoeft F. Recognizing psychiatric comorbidity with reading disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:101. [DOI]

10. Huang F, Sun L, Qian Y, Liu L, Ma Q-G, Yang L, et al. Cognitive function of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning difficulties: a developmental perspective. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(16):1922–8. [DOI]

11. McCoy TE, Conrad AL, Richman LC, Nopoulos PC, Bell EF. Memory processes in learning disability subtypes of children born preterm. Child Neuropsychol. 2013;19(2):173–89. [DOI]

12. Handler SM, Fierson WM. American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e818-856. [DOI]

13. Zimmer H, Speiser H, Seidler B. Spatio-temporal working-memory and short-term object-location tasks use different memory mechanisms. Acta psychologica. 2003;114(1):41–65. [DOI]

14. Seifnaraghi M, Naderi E. Specific learning disabilities: stage of diagnosis and rehabilitational methods. 2nd ed. Tehran, Iran: Arasbaran Pub; 2016, pp: 22–43. [Persian]

15. Khanjani Z, Mahdavian H, Ahmadi P, Hashemi T, Fathollahpour L. Comparison between the effect of neurofeedback and Fernald's multi-sensory approachon treatingchildren with dyslexia. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2013;2(8):117–47. [Persian] [Article]

16. Taghvayi D, Vaziri Sh, Kashani FL. The effectiveness of integrative approach, Fernald multi-sensory technique on decrease reading disability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;69:1264–9. [DOI]

17. Dalecki CG. Improving letter and word recognition using a multisensord recognition approach [Thesis for M.Sc. in Education]. [New York, US]: University of New York; 2007, pp: 89–110.

18. Pakofte N, Karimi P, Faramarzi F. Asarbakhshi amoozesh ravesh chand hessi Fernald bar behboud natavani yadgiri emla [The effectiveness of teaching fernald multi-sensory method on improving spelling learning disability]. In: 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Cultural Studies. Tehran, Iran: Center for Empowerment of Cultural and Social Skills of the Community; 2018. [Persian]

19. Bahramian A. Barrasi tasir amoozesh ravesh chand hessi Fernald dar behboud ekhtelal khandan [The effect of teaching fernald multi-sensory method on improving reading disorder]. In: International Conference on Management and Humanities. Tehran, Iran: Vira Institute; 2015. [Persian]

20. Gustafson L. Multi-sensory approach impact on learning sight words and engagement in a positive learning environment. [Thesis for Master of Special Education]. [Illinois, US]: Western Illinois University; 2018, pp: 43–62.

21. Holmes B. Comparative education: some considerations of method. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018, pp:85–96.

22. Agha-Babaie S, Malek_Pour M, Abadi, AA. Comparison of executive functions in children with and without spelling learning disability: performance on the NEPSY Neuropsychology Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2011;3(4):35-40. [Persian] [DOI]

23. Azizian M, Abedi MR. Construction and standardization of reading level diagnostic test for third grade primary school children. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2006;11(4):379–87. [Persian] [Article]

24. Willcutt EG, Boada R, Riddle MW, Chhabildas N, DeFries JC, Pennington BF. Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire: validation of a parent-report screening measure. Psychol Assess. 2011;23(3):778–91. [DOI]

25. Yailagh MS, Abbasi M, Behrozi N, Alipour S, Yakhchali AH. Comparisons of self-determination among students with learning disabilities and without learning disabilities. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014;3(2):27. [DOI]