Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 198 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dehghani Ashkezari E, Farzin Rad B, Kahdouei S. Predicting Psychological Vulnerability Based on Couples’ Communication Patterns. MEJDS 2020; 10 :198-198
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1782-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1782-en.html
1- Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch
2- Iran University of Medical Sciences
3- Imam Javad University of Yazd
2- Iran University of Medical Sciences
3- Imam Javad University of Yazd
Abstract: (1929 Views)
Background & Objectives: The community’s mental health plays a major role in ensuring its dynamism; however, this phenomenon is at risk due to the high prevalence of psychological vulnerability in individuals. Family determines the social attitudes and proficiencies of its members; interactions within the family impact their mental health. A linchpin in demonstrating the formation of a family is the couples' communication patterns on which the couple's interactions are based. As a result, it can significantly influence the psychological wellbeing of family and society members. According to the foregoing matters as well as the high prevalence of psychological vulnerability in the community, it is essential to consider the relevant fundamental factors. Considering the connection between the couples' interactions and psychological vulnerability, this research was conducted to predict psychological vulnerability based on couples' communication patterns.
Methods: This was a descriptive and correlational study. The statistical population of the research was all married clients referring to the counseling and psychotherapy centers of Yazd City, Iran, in 2018. In total, 260 subjects were selected as the study samples by the multistage cluster sampling method. The inclusion criteria of the research were couples who have been married for at least one year and referring to counseling centers for at least one time in 2018. Being educated below a middle school degree was also considered as the exclusion criterion. To collect the required information, two tools were used. The first questionnaire was a Symptoms Check List–90–Revised (Derogatis et al., 1976), which included 90 questions and 9 components. The second questionnaire was the couples' communication patterns (Christensen & Sullaway, 1984) with 35 questions and 3 components, including mutual constructive communication pattern, demand/withdrawal communication pattern, and mutual avoidance communication pattern. To analyze the collected data, the descriptive statistical methods were used, including mean, standard deviation, and distribution indicators; we also applied inferential statistics, including Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis at the significance level of 0.05 in SPSS.
Results: There was a significant negative relationship between psychological vulnerability and mutual constructive communication pattern (r=–0.2, p<0.001); the relationship between demand/withdrawal communication pattern (r=0.362, p<0.001) and mutual avoidance communication pattern (r=0.257, p<0.001) was positive. The multiple linear regression analysis by the simultaneous method suggested that demand/withdrawal communication pattern were positively (β=0.381, p<0.001) and mutual constructive communication patterns were negatively (β=–0.232, p<0.001) able to predict psychological vulnerability; however, mutual avoidance communication pattern failed to predict psychological vulnerability (β=0.102, p=0.137). Altogether, the model predicted 18% of psychological vulnerability changes; thus, this model was of a low prediction capability.
Conclusion: Considering the results, the existence of demand/withdrawal communication patterns among couples will increase psychological vulnerability; however, it is less among couples who apply mutual constructive communication patterns in their relationships. Therefore, to maintain psychological health in couples, it is necessary to pay more attention to their compatibility and problem–solving skills.
Methods: This was a descriptive and correlational study. The statistical population of the research was all married clients referring to the counseling and psychotherapy centers of Yazd City, Iran, in 2018. In total, 260 subjects were selected as the study samples by the multistage cluster sampling method. The inclusion criteria of the research were couples who have been married for at least one year and referring to counseling centers for at least one time in 2018. Being educated below a middle school degree was also considered as the exclusion criterion. To collect the required information, two tools were used. The first questionnaire was a Symptoms Check List–90–Revised (Derogatis et al., 1976), which included 90 questions and 9 components. The second questionnaire was the couples' communication patterns (Christensen & Sullaway, 1984) with 35 questions and 3 components, including mutual constructive communication pattern, demand/withdrawal communication pattern, and mutual avoidance communication pattern. To analyze the collected data, the descriptive statistical methods were used, including mean, standard deviation, and distribution indicators; we also applied inferential statistics, including Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis at the significance level of 0.05 in SPSS.
Results: There was a significant negative relationship between psychological vulnerability and mutual constructive communication pattern (r=–0.2, p<0.001); the relationship between demand/withdrawal communication pattern (r=0.362, p<0.001) and mutual avoidance communication pattern (r=0.257, p<0.001) was positive. The multiple linear regression analysis by the simultaneous method suggested that demand/withdrawal communication pattern were positively (β=0.381, p<0.001) and mutual constructive communication patterns were negatively (β=–0.232, p<0.001) able to predict psychological vulnerability; however, mutual avoidance communication pattern failed to predict psychological vulnerability (β=0.102, p=0.137). Altogether, the model predicted 18% of psychological vulnerability changes; thus, this model was of a low prediction capability.
Conclusion: Considering the results, the existence of demand/withdrawal communication patterns among couples will increase psychological vulnerability; however, it is less among couples who apply mutual constructive communication patterns in their relationships. Therefore, to maintain psychological health in couples, it is necessary to pay more attention to their compatibility and problem–solving skills.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Afshari Z, Rakhshani M. Factors related to mental health of students in Zabol University of Medical Sciences. J Neyshabur Univ Med Sci. 2014;2(3):28–36. [Persian] [Article]
2. Besharat MA, Masoodi M, Gholamali Lavasani M. Alexithymia and psychological and physical vulnerability. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2015;9(34):47–56. [Persian] [Article]
3. Garmezy N, Rutter M. Stress, Coping, and Development in Children. Baltimore, US: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1983.
4. World Health Organization. Risks to mental health: an overview of vulnerabilities and risk factors [Internet]. Background paper by WHO secretariat for the development of a comprehensive mental health action plan; 2012, pp: 1–14. Available from: [Article]
5. Que J, Lu L, Shi L. Development and challenges of mental health in China. Gen Psych. 2019;32(1):e100053. [DOI]
6. Formánek T, Kagström A, Cermakova P, Csémy L, Mladá K, Winkler P. Prevalence of mental disorders and associated disability: Results from the cross-sectional CZEch mental health Study (CZEMS). Eur Psychiatry. 2019;60:1–6. [DOI]
7. Zarei E, Mirzaei M, Sadeghifard M. Providing a model to determine the role of communication skills and problem solving skills in preventing from mental and social damages by mediated family conflicts. Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy. 2018;9(35):1–26. [Persian] [DOI]
8. Karimi M, Donyavi V, Rah Nejat AM, Kiani Moghaddam AS. Relationship spirituality with loving style and couple’s communication pattern. Nurse and Physician Within War. 2017;5(15):44–52. [Persian] [Article]
9. Esmaeilpour Kh, Khajeh V, Mahdavi N. Predicting couples’ marital satisfaction based on relationship beliefs and relationship skills. Journal of Family Research. 2014;9(1):29–44. [Persian] [Article]
10. Amstad FT, Meier LL, Fasel U, Elfering A, Semmer NK. A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. J Occup Health Psychol. 2011;16(2):151–69. [DOI]
11. Javidi N, Soleymani A, Ahmadi K, Samadzadeh M. The effectiveness of Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy (EFT) to improve communication patterns in couples. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2013;11(5):402–10. [Persian] [Article]
12. Fatehizadeh, M, Ahmadi. The relationship between marital satisfaction and communication patterns of couples in Isfahan university. Journal of Family Research. 2005;1(2):109–19. [Persian] [Article]
13. Christensen A, Shenk JL. Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(3):458–63. [DOI]
14. Bidram M. Rabete beyn olgou-haye ertebati va vijegi-haye shakhsiyati zojeyn ba sazegari zanashouie va rezayat zanashouie [The Relationship between communication patterns and couples’ characteristics with marital adjustment and marital satisfaction] [Thesis for M.Sc. in Family Counseling]. [Kerman, Iran]: Shahid Bahonar University;2014, p:5. [Persian]
15. Zarepour M, Asoode MH. Salamat ravan zojeyn: naghsh ab’ade samimiat zanashouie va olgouhaye ertebati [Couples mental health: the role of marital intimacy dimensions and communication patterns]. In: Second National Conference on Family Psychology [Internet]. Marvdasht, Iran: Islamic Azad University of Marvdasht; 2014. [Persian] [Article]
16. Bahrami M, Nazari AM, ZAhra Kar K. Prediction of couple’s communication patterns by spiritual health and psychological well-being. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2014;9(33):7–16. [Persian] [Article]
17. Gilbert P, Allan S, Goss K. Parental representations, shame, interpersonal problems, and vulnerability to psychopathology. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 1996;3(1):23–34. [DOI]
18. Noorbala AA, Faghihzadeh S, Kamali K, Bagheri Yazdi SA, Hajebi A, Mousavi MT, et al. Mental health survey of the Iranian adult population in 2015. Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(3):128–34.
19. Green SB. How Many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26(3):499–510. [Article]
20. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1976;128:280–9. [DOI]
21. Fathi Ashtiani A, Dastani M. Psychological Tests: personality and mental health. Tehran: Be’sat Pub;2009, pp:291–304. [Persian]
22. Modabernia MJ, Shojaie Tehranie H, Falahi M, Faghirpour M. Normalizing SCL-90-R inventory in guilan high-school students. J Guilan Uni Med Sci. 2010;19(75):58–65. [Persian] [Article]
23. Christensen A, Sullaway M. Communication patterns questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire. University of California, Los Angeles; 1984.
24. Ebadatpoor B. Hanjaryabi porsesh-name olgouhaye ertebati zanashouie dar shahr Tehran dar sale 78–79 [Standardization of Marital Relationship Pattern Questionnaire in Tehran, 1999-2000] [Thesis for M.Sc. in Educational Science]. [Tehran, Iran]:Tarbiat Moallem University; 2000, pp:52–73. [Persian]
25. Heavey CL, Larson BM, Zumtobel DC, Christensen A. The communication patterns questionnaire: the reliability and validity of a constructive communication subscale. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1996;58(3):796–800. [DOI]
26. Klever P. Goal direction and effectiveness, emotional maturity, and nuclear family functioning. J Marital Fam Ther. 2009;35(3):308–24. [DOI]
27. Eldridge KA, Sevier M, Jones J, Atkins DC, Christensen A. Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(2):218–26. [DOI]
28. Rezaeian H, Massumy S, Hosseinian S. The study and comparison self-differentiation, communication patterns, and sexual satisfaction in divorce-seeking and normal couples. Journal of Applied Counseling. 2018;7(2):17–32. [Persian] [DOI]
29. Niszczota P. Neuroticism, Uncertainty, and Foreign Investment [Internet]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2014. Report No.: ID 2431188. Available from: [Article]
30. Ghasemi N, Kajbaf M-B, Rabiei M. The effectiveness of Quality Of Life Therapy (QOLT) on Subjective Well–Being (SWB) and mental health. J Cli Psy. 2011;3(2):23–34. [Persian] [DOI]
31. Baradaran Eftekhari M, Forouzan AS, Mirabzadeh A, Dejman M, Yousefi H. Maintaining and promoting techniques for mental health used by Iranian married women: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2018;24(1):70–9. [Persian] [DOI]
32. Hajebi A, Khoshdel H, NaserBakht M, Khanmohamadi A. The relationship between social support and marital adjustment and mental health of women in a government organization. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation. 2017;25(4):247–56. [Persian] [Article]
33. Gottman JM. The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(1):6–15. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
