Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 33 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Seyed Ghandi M S, Gharibdoust M, Hamel O, Shafaatzadeh K. The Role of Spiritual Intelligence and Resilience in Predicting Marital Intimacy of Mothers of Students with Learning Disabilities. MEJDS 2022; 12 :33-33
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1956-en.html
1- Kharazmi Pardis, Karaj, Iran
2- Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
3- Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch
4- Kharazmi University
Abstract:   (1794 Views)

Background & Objectives: The children with learning disabilities often affect the family and may cause tensions and conflicts between family members, especially mothers. Family life may become instable, and marital quality and intimacy between husband and wife may decrease. Most researchers believe that religious beliefs can significantly impact the strength of the family and marital relations. In recent decades, a new concept that psychologists have considered in the psychology of religion is spiritual intelligence. Spiritual intelligence includes a sense of meaning and a mission in life. It refers to a sense of sanctity in life, a balanced understanding of the value of the matter, and a belief in the betterment of the world. It is necessary to identify the factors related to marital intimacy—the firm foundation of family life. So, the present study aimed to investigate the role of spiritual intelligence and resilience in predicting the marital intimacy of mothers with students with learning disabilities.
Methods: The present research method was descriptive correlational. The study's statistical population consisted of all mothers of children with learning disabilities living in Karaj City, Iran, in the academic year 2018–2019. Of them, 100 mothers of children with learning disabilities were selected with the available sampling method. The inclusion criteria for mothers included having a minimum level of primary education, a definitive diagnosis of their child's learning disability by experts and educators of the Learning Disability Center, no mental illness based on the student's file form, and having consent to complete the questionnaire. The exclusion criteria for mothers were unwillingness to cooperate and Illiteracy. Data collection tools included King Spiritual Intelligence Scale (King, 2008), Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (Connor & Davidson, 2003), and Marital Intimacy Scale (Walker & Thompson, 1983). The obtained data were analyzed using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple linear regression) in SPSS 24. The significance level of the tests was set at 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the standardized (regression) coefficients (Beta) were as follows for the components of critical existential thinking (p=0.002, β=0.260), personal meaning production (p<0.001, β=0.398), transcendental awarness (p=0.015, β=0.165), the consciousness state expansion (p=0.007, β=0.207), personal competence image (p<0.001, β=0.286), confidence in personal instincts (p=0.025, β=0.140), tolerating negative affections (p<0.001, β=0.288), inhibition/control (p=0.044, β=0.176) and the spirituality (p=0.016, β=0.215). Spiritual intelligence (66.4%) and resilience (82.7%) could also significantly predict marital intimacy (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on the study findings, the marital intimacy of mothers with students with learning disabilities can be provided by promoting their spiritual intelligence and resilience.

Full-Text [PDF 782 kb]   (432 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Ashkani F, Heydari H. Effects of emotional adjustment on psychological welfare and attributional styles of students with learning disabilities in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2014;4(1):6–22. [Persian] [Article]
2. Chupan Zideh R, Abedi A, Pirooz Zijerdi M. The effectiveness of training attention based onfletcher's program on the reading performance of female student with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2015;4(4):36–48. [Persian] [Article]
3. Maki KE, Adams SR. A current landscape of specific learning disability identification: Training, practices, and implications. Psychology in the Schools. 2019;56(1):18–31. [DOI]
4. Kanani Z, Adibsereshki N, Haghgoo H, Rezasoltani P. The effect of self-monitoring training on the academic achievement of the students with dyslexia. Community Health Journal. 2017;8(4):29–37. [Persian] [Article]
5. Matin H, Ahmadi S, Jalali M. Phenomenology of the experiences of mothers of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Family Psychology. 2019;5(2):53–64. [Persian] [Article]
6. Hsiao Y-J. Parental stress in families of children with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic. 2018;53(4):201–5. [DOI]
7. Di Giulio P, Philipov D, Jaschinski I. Families with disabled children in different European countries. Families and Societis. 2014;23:1–44.
8. Labrecque LT, Whisman MA. Extramarital sex and marital dissolution: does identity of the extramarital partner matter? Family Process. 2020;59(3):1308–18. [DOI]
9. Chan WCH, To SM, Wong KLY. Intimacy as a distinct construct: validating the intimacy scale among older adults of residential care homes in Hong Kong. The Open Family Studies Journal. 2015;7(1):60–7. [DOI]
10. Amiri Majd M, Hosseini SF, Jafari A. Comparing the quality of life and marital intimacy among parents of children with down syndrome, parents of children with learning disabilities, and parents of normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2014;4(1):38–55. [Persian] [Article]
11. Monjezi F, Shafi-Abadi A, Sudani M. A study of Islamic communication Style and Religious attitudes on improvement of marrital satisfaction. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2013;10(1):30–8. [Persian]
12. Rasouli R, Soltanegerd Faramarz S. The comparison and relationship between religious orientation and practical commitment to religious beliefs with marital adjustment in seminary scholars and university students. Journal of Family Research. 2012;8(4):427–39. [Persian] [Article]
13. Rahimpour F, Salehi SY, Hoseinian S, Abasiyan M. Explanation ofcouples' marital satisfaction based on spiritual intelligence and early maladaptive schemas. Educational Administration Research. 2013;4(15):77–90. [Persian] [Article]
14. Pant N, Srivastava SK. The impact of spiritual intelligence, gender and educational background on mental health among college students. J Relig Health. 2019;58(1):87–108. [DOI]
15. Basravi S, Abbasi T. Study the relationship of spiritual intelligence and quality dimensions of the marital relation (intimacy and sexual excitement) of Karaj married women. Quarterly Journal of Health Breeze. 2016;4(3):15–20. [Persian] [Article]
16. Tavakolizadeh J, Soltani A, Panahi M. Marital adjustment: The predictive role of spiritual intelegence and coping strategeis. The Horizon of Medical Sciences. 2014;19(5):57–63. [Persian] [Article]
17. AlidadiTaeme F, JaafariRoshan M, EsmaeelPour Moghaddam HR. The relationship between spiritual intelligence and strategies for dealing with marital conflicts and marital satisfaction among married students in Tehran. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;4(3):507–29. [Persian] [Article]
18. Holland KJ, Lee JW, Marshak HH, Martin LR. Spiritual intimacy, marital intimacy, and physical/psychological well-being: spiritual meaning as a mediator. Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2016;8(3):218–27. [DOI]
19. Ebad Por A, Saber S. Assessment of marital satisfaction based on resilience and self-differentiation. Psychometry. 2015;4(13):1–11. [Persian] [Article]
20. Milioni M, Alessandri G, Eisenberg N, Castellani V, Zuffianò A, Vecchione M, et al. Reciprocal relations between emotional self-efficacy beliefs and ego-resiliency across time. J Pers. 2015;83(5):552–63. [DOI]
21. Meikaeilei N, Ganji M, Talebi Joybari3 M. A comparison of resiliency, marital satisfaction and mental health in parents of children with learning disabilities and normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2012;2(1):120–37. [Persian] [Article]
22. Behzapoor S, Motahari Z, Sohrabi F. The role of religiosity and resilience in predicting marital stress in the mothers of children suffering from attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2015;5(18):71–8. [Persian] [DOI]
23. Heiman T. Parents of children with disabilities: resilience, coping, and future expectations. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2002;14(2):159–71. [DOI]
24. Duca D-S. Family resilience and parental stress: the effects on marital relationship in the context of a child diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. Editura Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iaşi. 2015;24(1):71–90.
25. Momeni K, Ebrahimi P, Hosseinian S. Erteghaye salamat ravan va keyfiat zendegi az tarigh barname amoozesh tab avary baraye madaran koodakan daraye ekhtelal yadgiri [Improving mental health and quality of life through resiliency training program for mothers of children with learning disabilities]. Women and Families Cultural Educational Journal. 2015;(26):40–65. [Persian] [Article]
26. Farshbaf Mani Sefat F, Pourrahim E. Comparison of mental health, psychological capital, and marital intimacy in mothers of children with hearing impairment, those with intellectual disabilities, and normal children. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2018;18(1):33–46. [Persian] [Article]
27. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2015. [Persian]
28. King DB. Rethinking claims of spiritual intelligence: A definition, model, and measure [Thesis for M.Sc.]. [Ontarop, Canada]: Trent University; 2008.
29. Raghib MÕS, Ahmadi J, Siadat A. Analysis of amount of spiritual intelligence among students at university of Isfahan andit's relation to demographic traits. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2008;5(8):39–56. [Persian] [DOI]
30. Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82. [DOI]
31. Mohamadi M. Avamel moaser bar tab avari dar afrad dar maraz khatar sooe masraf mavad [Investigating the factors affecting resilience in subjects at risk of substance abuse] [Ph.D dissertion]. [Tehran, Iran]: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2005. [Persian]
32. Walker AJ, Thompson L. Intimacy and intergenerational aid and contact among mothers and daughters. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1983;45(4):841–9. [DOI]
33. Heydari A, Eqhbal F. Evaluation of relationship between difficulty in emotionregulation, attachment styles and intimacy and marital satisfaction in couples of Ahwaz Steel Company. Journal of Social Psychology. 2010;5(15):115–34. [Persian]
34. Golmohammadian M, Farahbaksh K, Esmaili M. Study the effectiveness of moral, spiritual and cultural intelligence training on marital maladjustment in women. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2013;3(2):209–33. [Persian] [Article]
35. Bakhshayesh A. Prediction of marital satisfaction based oncouple's emotional and spiritual intelligence. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society. 2014;5(18):69–84. [Persian] [Article]
36. Block JH, Block J. The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In: Development of cognition, affect, and social relations. Psychology Press; 1982. pp:49–112.
37. Bonanno GA. Resilience in the face of potential trauma. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005;14(3):135–8. [DOI]
38. Masten AS, Cutuli JJ, Herbers JE, Reed M-GJ. Resilience in development. In: Lopez SJ, Snyder CR, editors. The Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press; 200 pp: 116–32.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb