Developing A Model of Sexual Satisfaction Based on Alexithymia, Sexual Knowledge and Attitude in Couples: The Mediating Role of Sexual Self-Concept

Zolfaghari, Soheila; Moradi, Omid; Ahmadian, Hamzeh; Shams Alizadeh , Narges

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 248 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Zolfaghari S, Moradi O, Ahmadian H, Shams Alizadeh N. Developing A Model of Sexual Satisfaction Based on Alexithymia, Sexual Knowledge and Attitude in Couples: The Mediating Role of Sexual Self-Concept. MEJDS 2022; 12 :248-248
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2078-en.html

Developing A Model of Sexual Satisfaction Based on Alexithymia, Sexual Knowledge and Attitude in Couples: The Mediating Role of Sexual Self-Concept

Soheila Zolfaghari¹

, Omid Moradi ^*¹

, Hamzeh Ahmadian¹

, Narges Shams Alizadeh¹

1- Department of Psychology, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract: (1604 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The concept of sexual satisfaction refers to a situation where a couple feels happy and satisfied with each other most of the time. Sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment are important aspects of marital life that strongly affect the quality and stability of the couple's relationships. Studies have shown that several factors, including psychological, social, economic, personal and demographic characteristics affect sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment. Of those, sexual knowledge and attitude are among the most important and influential factors. Alexithymia is a construct that has recently been considered by researchers a critical factor in interpersonal relationships. This factor prevents experiencing and expressing emotion via influencing affections, and since sexual satisfaction is a type of taking and giving pleasure it affects sexual satisfaction, too. The development and consolidation of a person's understanding of himself/herself as a sexual person or sexual self–concept is an important task during adolescence and youth. This study was designed to develop a model of sexual satisfaction based on alexithymia and sexual knowledge and attitude in couples with considering the mediating role of sexual self–concept.
Methods: In this correlational study, we used structural equation modeling. The study population included all couples referred to counseling centers in Sanandaj City, Iran due to boredom and marital problems in 2018–2019. Of whom, 300 people were selected by convenience sampling method. The inclusion criteria were couples referring to the counseling centers of Sanandaj with a high score in marital boredom (score greater than 55). The exclusion criterion was not answering the questions of the questionnaires. The study instruments included the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (Bagby et al., 1994), Sexual Knowledge and Attitude Scale (Besharat & Ranjbar Kelagari, 2013), Multidimensional Sexual Self–Concept Questionnaire (Snell, 1998), and Sexual Satisfaction Scale (Hudson et al., 1981). Frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used to describe the obtained data. To analyze the data, the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were performed in SPSS version 22 and SmartPLS software. The level of significance in this research was considered 0.05.
Results: The results showed that sexual self–concept had a significant direct effect on sexual satisfaction (p<0.001, β=0.464); sexual knowledge and attitude had a significant direct effect on sexual self–concept (p<0.001, β=0.224) and sexual satisfaction (p<0.001, β=0.297), and alexithymia had a significant direct effect on sexual self–concept (p<0.001, β=–0.613) and sexual satisfaction (p<0.001, β=–0.206). In addition, sexual knowledge and attitude indirectly and through sexual self–concept had a positive and significant effect on sexual satisfaction (p<0.001, β=0.104); also, alexithymia indirectly and through sexual self–concept, had an inverse and significant effect on sexual satisfaction (p<0.001, β=–0.285).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, sexual knowledge and attitude as well as alexithymia have a significant effect on sexual satisfaction indirectly and through sexual self–concept.

Keywords: Sexual satisfaction, Alexithymia, Sexual knowledge and attitude, Sexual self–concept

Full-Text [PDF 638 kb] (62 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Jackson JB, Miller RB, Oka M, Henry RG. Gender differences in marital satisfaction: a meta-analysis: gender and marital satisfaction meta-analysis. Fam Relat. 2014;76(1):105–29. [DOI]

2. Lavner JA, Karney BR, Bradbury TN. Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? couple communication and marital satisfaction. Fam Relat. 2016;78(3):680–94. [DOI]

3. Li T, Fung HH. The dynamic goal theory of marital satisfaction. Review of General Psychology. 2011;15(3):246–54. [DOI]

4. Carr D, Freedman VA, Cornman JC, Schwarz N. Happy marriage, happy life? marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Fam Relat. 2014;76(5):930–48. [DOI]

5. McNulty JK, Wenner CA, Fisher TD. Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(1):85–97. [DOI]

6. Bloch L, Haase CM, Levenson RW. Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion. 2014;14(1):130–44. [DOI]

7. Van Steenbergen EF, Kluwer ES, Karney BR. Work–family enrichment, work–family conflict, and marital satisfaction: a dyadic analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):182–94. [DOI]

8. Yoo H, Bartle-Haring S, Day RD, Gangamma R. Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(4):275–93. [DOI]

9. Dew J, Wilcox WB. If momma ain’t happy: explaining declines in marital satisfaction among new mothers. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73(1):1–12. [DOI]

10. Jones KC, Welton SR, Oliver TC, Thoburn JW. Mindfulness, spousal attachment, and marital satisfaction: a mediated model. The Family Journal. 2011;19(4):357–61. [DOI]

11. Pines AM, Neal MB, Hammer LB, Icekson T. Job Burnout and couple burnout in dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation. Soc Psychol Q. 2011;74(4):361–86. [DOI]

12. King DB, DeLongis A. When couples disconnect: Rumination and withdrawal as maladaptive responses to everyday stress. J Fam Psychol. 2014;28(4):460–9. [DOI]

13. Ghavi F, Jamale S, Mosalanejad L, Mosallanezhad Z. A study of couple burnout in infertile couples. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;8(4):158. [DOI]

14. Sayadi M, Shahhosseini Tazik S, Madani Y, Gholamali lavasani M. The effectiveness of emotionally focused couple therapy on marital commitment and couple burnout in infertile couples. J Edu Commun Health. 2017;4(3):26–37. [Persian] [DOI]

15. Asadi E, Mansour L, Khodabakhshi A, Fathabadi J. The relationship between couple burnout, sexual assertiveness, and sexual dysfunctional beliefs in women with diabetic husbands and comparing them with women with non-diabetic husbands. J Family Research. 2013;9(3):311–24. [Persian] [Article]

16. Gohari S, Zahrakar K, Nazari AM, Salimi H. Prediction of marital burnout based on personality traits and sexual intimacy in married woman nurses in selected private hospitals in Tehran. Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2016;6(3):59–70. [Persian] [Article]

17. Davarniya R, Zahrakar K, Moayeri N, Shakarami M. Assessing the performance of emotionally-focused group couples therapy (EFCT) on reducing couple burnout in women. Medical Sciences. 2015;25(2):132–40. [Persian] [Article]

18. Besharat M, Ganji P. The moderating role of attachment styles on the relationship of alexithymia with marital satisfaction. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2013;14(56):325–35. [Persian] [Article]

19. Zare Derakhshan R, Roshan Chesley M. The relationship between sexual self-efficacy, sexual satisfaction, and happiness with mediating emotional consciousness on marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2020;18(1):1–16. [Persian] [Article]

20. Rastgo N, Golzari M, Barati Sedeh F. The effectiveness of sexual knowledge on marital satisfaction in married women sex. Clinical Psychology Studies. 2015;5(17):35–48. [Persian] [Article]

21. Jaafarpour Ghohnoyeh M, Maroufi M, Molaeinezhad M. Relationship between sexual self-concept and sexual performance in married women referring to Mobarakeh Health Centers, Iran. J Res Dev Nurs Midwifery. 2016;12(S3):40–7. [Persian] [Article]

22. Heidari A, Asgari P, Bakhtiarpour S, Hafezi F. The role of mediation of alexithymia in the relationship between depression and marital satisfaction in elementary school teachers with gender moderation. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2019;62(4):179–88. [Persian] [Article]

23. Kline RB. Structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 1998

24. Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JDA. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1994;38:33-40.

25. Besharat MA, Shahidi S. What is the relationship between alexithymia and ego defense styles? a correlational study with Iranian students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2011;4(2):145–9. [DOI]

26. Besharat MA, Ranjbar Kelagari E. Development and validation of Sexual Knowledge and Attitude Scale. Contemporary Psychology. 2013;8(1):21–32. [Persian]

27. Snell WE. The Multidimensional Sexual Self-Concept Questionnaire. In: Davis CM, Yarber WL, Bauserman R, Schreer G, Davis SL; editors. Handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.

28. Ziaei T, Khoei EM, Salehi M, Farajzadegan Z. Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of modified multidimensional Sexual Self-concept Questionnaire. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(6):439–45.

29. Hudson WW, Harrison DF, Crosscup PC. A Short‐Form Scale to Measure Sexual Discord in Dyadic Relationships. J Sex Res. 1981;17(2):157–74. [DOI]

30. Dehghani Champiri F, Dehghani A. Predicting sexual satisfaction in Iranian women by marital satisfaction components. Sex Relation Ther. 2020;1–15. [DOI]