Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 192 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zaal B, Arab A, Sanagouye-Moharer G R. Comparing the Effects of Forgiveness and Self-Compassion Training on Marital Conflicts in Females Facing Marital Infidelity. MEJDS 2020; 10 :192-192
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2181-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2181-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Psychology Department, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan
2- Psychology Department, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan
Abstract: (1860 Views)
Background & Objectives: Infidelity is among the most destructive abuses experienced in a relationship, defined as "having sexual relationships with someone other than a regular spouse or sexual partner." Studies suggested that marital infidelity is the main cause of marital dissatisfaction and conflicts as well as disputes in couples. The constant conflicts between couples increase the psychological pressure imposed on both parties. Forgiveness is a psychological construct and therapeutic approach to communication problems and marital conflicts of spouses. In addition to forgiveness–based therapy, compassion–based cognitive therapy is a method to help individuals further develop an intimate relationship with themselves. Couple therapists consider marital infidelity as the most difficult problem to treat concerning marital problems. Thus, comparing different approaches can be effective in developing an integrated intervention in this respect. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of forgiveness and self–compassion training on reducing conflicts between women who encountered marital infidelity.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with pretest–posttest–follow–up and a control group design. The research population consisted of women who encountered marital infidelity referring to counseling and assistance centers in Birjand City, Iran, in 2018. The study sample consisted of 52 individuals who were divided into two experimental groups of forgiveness training (n=16) and self–compassion training (n=18) and a control group (n=18) and selected by purposive sampling method. The inclusion criteria of the study were as follows: being married; having experienced marital infidelity during the last two years, and no receipt of previous psychological interventions. The exclusion criteria of the research were unwillingness to continue cooperation with the study, and the existence of obvious mental health disorders (these criteria were screened through the participants' self–declaration). The study participants completed the Marriage Conflict Scale (Eggeman et al., 1985) before and after the intervention and three months later. The research intervention was performed using the forgiveness training package and self–compassion training package. Forgiveness training was developed by Park (2003) based on the 4 steps of the enlightenment forgiveness process model, including anger expression, resentment, decision making, and anger relief, i.e., performed in twelve 60–minute sessions. Self–Compassion Training was designed by Gilbert (2005) in twelve 90–minute sessions that teach empathy, compassion, acceptance and tolerance, responsibility, and a sense of worth. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS and repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at the significance level of p<0.05.
Results: Investigating the interactive effect of independent variables revealed that marital conflict scores have changed over time from pre–intervention to follow–up. Besides, there was a significant difference between the three groups of forgiveness, compassion, and control in this respect (p<0.001). The significance of the effect of the independent variable (group) highlights that the group variable presented a significant effect on the mean values of marital conflict; the mean scores of marital conflict significantly varied between the three research groups (p<0.001). The Bonferroni posthoc test data suggested a significant difference in the scores of marital conflict between the two groups of compassion and forgiveness (p=0.006), as well as between the compassion and control groups (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the forgiveness and control groups in this regard (p=1.000).
Conclusion: The present research data indicated that the effectiveness of self–compassion training was higher than that of the self–forgiveness training on marital conflicts. Therefore, using self–compassion as a useful and effective intervention can be profitable in reducing the marital conflicts of women experiencing marital infidelity.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with pretest–posttest–follow–up and a control group design. The research population consisted of women who encountered marital infidelity referring to counseling and assistance centers in Birjand City, Iran, in 2018. The study sample consisted of 52 individuals who were divided into two experimental groups of forgiveness training (n=16) and self–compassion training (n=18) and a control group (n=18) and selected by purposive sampling method. The inclusion criteria of the study were as follows: being married; having experienced marital infidelity during the last two years, and no receipt of previous psychological interventions. The exclusion criteria of the research were unwillingness to continue cooperation with the study, and the existence of obvious mental health disorders (these criteria were screened through the participants' self–declaration). The study participants completed the Marriage Conflict Scale (Eggeman et al., 1985) before and after the intervention and three months later. The research intervention was performed using the forgiveness training package and self–compassion training package. Forgiveness training was developed by Park (2003) based on the 4 steps of the enlightenment forgiveness process model, including anger expression, resentment, decision making, and anger relief, i.e., performed in twelve 60–minute sessions. Self–Compassion Training was designed by Gilbert (2005) in twelve 90–minute sessions that teach empathy, compassion, acceptance and tolerance, responsibility, and a sense of worth. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS and repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at the significance level of p<0.05.
Results: Investigating the interactive effect of independent variables revealed that marital conflict scores have changed over time from pre–intervention to follow–up. Besides, there was a significant difference between the three groups of forgiveness, compassion, and control in this respect (p<0.001). The significance of the effect of the independent variable (group) highlights that the group variable presented a significant effect on the mean values of marital conflict; the mean scores of marital conflict significantly varied between the three research groups (p<0.001). The Bonferroni posthoc test data suggested a significant difference in the scores of marital conflict between the two groups of compassion and forgiveness (p=0.006), as well as between the compassion and control groups (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the forgiveness and control groups in this regard (p=1.000).
Conclusion: The present research data indicated that the effectiveness of self–compassion training was higher than that of the self–forgiveness training on marital conflicts. Therefore, using self–compassion as a useful and effective intervention can be profitable in reducing the marital conflicts of women experiencing marital infidelity.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Ruhlmann LM, Gallus KL, Durtschi JA. Exploring relationship satisfaction and attachment behaviors in single- and dual-trauma couples: A pilot study. Traumatology. 2018;24(1):27–35. [DOI]
2. Dehghani M, Aslani K, Amanelahi A, Rajabi G. The effectiveness of emotionally focused couples therapy based on attachment injury resolution model on forgiveness among the injured women with marital infidelity. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2019;9(1):143–60. [Persian] [Article]
3. Shrout MR, Weigel DJ. Coping with infidelity: The moderating role of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020;154:109631. [DOI]
4. Pichon M, Treves-Kagan S, Stern E, Kyegombe N, Stöckl H, Buller AM. A mixed-methods systematic review: infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5682. [DOI]
5. Ignat R. 704 Infidelity, impulsivity, attachment and distorted cognitions. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2018;15(7):S401. [DOI]
6. Spring JA. After the affair: healing the pain and rebuilding trust when a partner has been unfaithful. Farji M. (Persian translator). Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2014.
7. Peluso PR, editor. Infidelity: a practitioner’s guide to working with couples in crisis. Vakili P, Khaleghi A. (Persian translator). Tehran: Arjmand Pub;2015, pp:31–2.
8. Williams ML. Romantic love communication:Examination of Equity and Effects on Relational sexual and communication satisfaction [Ph.D dissertion]. [Ohio, US]: Kent State University; 2012.
9. Snyder DK, Baucom DH, Gordon KC. An Integrative Approach to Treating Infidelity. The Family Journal. 2008;16(4):300–7. [DOI]
10. Brown SL, Sanchez LA, Nock SL, Wright JD. Links between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital quality, stability, and divorce: A comparison of covenant versus standard marriages. Social Science Research. 2006;35(2):454–70. [DOI]
11. Bagarozzi DA, Sperry L. Couples assessment strategy and inventories. In: Couple and family assessment: Contemporary and cutting-edge strategies, 2nd ed. New York, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2012. pp: 137–62. (Family therapy and counseling series).
12. DiBlasio FA, Benda BB. Forgiveness intervention with married couples: Two empirical analyses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity. 2008;27(2):150–8.
13. Nudelman G, Nadler A. The effect of apology on forgiveness: Belief in a just world as a moderator. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017;116:191–200. [DOI]
14. Aghagedi P, Golparvar M, Khayatan F, Aghaei A. Forgiveness based mindfulness and emotionally focused therapy on rumination and marital satisfaction of women injured by husband’s infidelity. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2019;9:102. [Persian] [Article]
15. Meneses CW, Greenberg LS. Interpersonal forgiveness in emotion-focused couples’ therapy: relating process to outcome. J Marital Fam Ther. 2014;40(1):49–67. [DOI]
16. Barghi Irani Z, Bagiyan Kulemare MJ, Bakhti M. Effectiveness of cognitive therapy based on. Contemporary Psychology. 2016;11(1):103–17. [Persian] [Article]
17. Foroutan M, Nejat H, Toozandehjani H. Comparing the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy and dialectical behavior therapy on distress tolerance and pain management in patients with multiple sclerosis. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:30. [Persian] [Article]
18. Wren AA, Somers TJ, Wright MA, Goetz MC, Leary MR, Fras AM, et al. Self-compassion in patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain: relationship of self-compassion to adjustment to persistent pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;43(4):759–70. [DOI]
19. Neff KD, Kirkpatrick KL, Rude SS. Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality. 2007;41(1):139–54. [DOI]
20. Raes F. Rumination and worry as mediators of the relationship between self-compassion and depression and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010;48(6):757–61. [DOI]
21. Basharpour S, Isazadegan A. Role of self-compassion and forgiveness in prediction of depression severity among university students. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2013;10(6):452–61. [Persian] [Article]
22. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2015. [Persian]
23. Eggeman K, Moxley V, Schumm W R. Assessing spouses' perceptions of Gottman's temporal form in marital conflict. Psychol Rep. 1985;57(1):171–81. [DOI]
24. Arab Alidousti A, Nakhaee N, Khanjani N. Reliability and validity of the Persian versions of the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction (Brief version) and Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scales. Health and Development Journal. 2015;4(2):158–67. [Persian] [Article]
25. Park JH. Validating the effectiveness of a forgiveness intervention program for adolescent female aggressive victims in Korea. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2003;64(5-A):1528.
26. Lavafpour Noori F, Zahrakar K, Sanai Zaker B. a study of effectiveness of group forgiveness therapy in reducing aggression among 11-13 year old male adolescents in city of Dezful. Shahid Sadoughi Uni Med Sci. 2012;20(4):489–500. [Persian] [Article]
27. Gilbert P. Compassion focused therapy: distinctive features. Esbati M, Feizi A. (Persian translator). Tehran: Ebn-e-Sina Pub;2018.
28. Saeidi M, Khalatbari J, Ghorbanshiroudi S, Abolghasemi S. Cognitive behavioral therapy and compassion focused therapy on loneliness of women on the verge of divorce. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:9. [Persian] [Article]
29. Hamidipour R, Sanaee Zaker B, Nazari AM, Naghi Farahani M. Effectiveness of forgiveness-based marital group therapy on matrimonial satisfaction. Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2010;8(4):49–72. [Persian] [DOI]
30. Mikaeli N, Karimi S, Basharpour S. Naghshe delsouzi be khod dar pishbini behzisti ravanshenakhti zanan nabavar [The role of self-compassion in prediction of psychological well-being of infertile women]. In: Second National Conference on Psychology of Educational and Social Sciences [Internet]. Babol, Iran: Scientific Research Institute of Komeh Elmavaran; 2016. [Persian] [Article]
31. Bahari F, Fatehizadeh M, Ahmadi S, Molavi H, Bahrami F. The effect of hope, forgiveness and combined marital counseling on interpersonal cognitive distortions of divorcing couples. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2010;8(1):25–33. [Persian] [Article]
32. Dashtbozorgi Z. Effectiveness of self- compassion therapy on loneliness and emotion regulation of damaged women from marital infidelity. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2018;18(4):72–9. [Persian] [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
