Volume 11 - Articles-1400
MEJDS (2021) 11: 36 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: کد اخلاق به شماره IR.BUMS.REC.1399.238
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ahmadi S A, vaziri S, Ahi G, Lotfi Kashani F, Akbari M E. Comparing the Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Spiritual Therapy on Psychological Distress in Patients With Breast Cancer. MEJDS 2021; 11 :36-36
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2500-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2500-en.html
Seyyed Ali Ahmadi1 
, Shahram Vaziri *2 , Ghasem Ahi3 , Farah Lotfi Kashani2 , Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari4
, Shahram Vaziri *2 , Ghasem Ahi3 , Farah Lotfi Kashani2 , Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari4
1- Department of Clinical Psychology, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Rodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University
4- Department of Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University
2- Department of Psychology, Rodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University
4- Department of Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University
Abstract: (1265 Views)
Background & Objectives: Breast Cancer (BC) causes numerous biopsychological complications that require appropriate interventions. The number of cancer patients is increasingly higher than before worldwide; thus, this chronic disease is a major problem for individuals’ health. A therapy used in the present study was Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to facilitate decreasing distress in patients with breast cancer. This aim was achieved by helping them to reach a level of psychological flexibility to accept what they cannot change and try to modify the changeable matters, to improve their health condition. The present study also implemented Spiritual Therapy (ST) to help these patients find meaning in life and follow their lives according to the values in the most tragic circumstances. Such interventions could significantly help to reduce distress among this group. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effects of ACT and ST on psychological distress (anxiety, depression, stress) in women with breast cancer to enjoy a better life.
Methods: This was a quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of this study included all patients with BC, referring to Dr. Gholami's Clinic in Kashmar City, Iran, in February 2020. Forty-Five eligible volunteers entered the study; they were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15); two experimental (ACT & ST), and one control groups. The inclusion criteria of the study were patients with BC (according to oncologists’ diagnosis), the age of 18-65 years, receiving chemotherapy for ≥1 month, no history of mental illness, having at least primary education (reading & writing abilities), no co-morbid physical illness, and patients’ consent and ability to attend all treatment sessions. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (Lavibund and Lavibund, 1995) were used in pretest and posttest phases to define and measure anxiety, depression, and stress in the study subjects. The ACT group received eight 75-minute training sessions two days a week according to a protocol developed by Hayes and associates (2006). The ST group participated in nine 75-minute training sessions two days a week. The protocol used in the ST group was adapted from the protocol developed by Richard and Bergin (2005). However, the controls received no intervention. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics, including univariate Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Bonferroni posthoc test in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The mean posttest scores of depression, anxiety, and stress (after controlling the pretest scores) were significantly higher in both research groups; thus, ACT and ST could effectively reduce depression (p<0.001), anxiety (p<0.001), and stress (p<0.001) in the study subjects. The ETA-squared value indicated that respectively >61%, >56%, and >66% of changes in the depression, anxiety, and stress components in women with BC could be explained by ACT and ST. Bonferroni test data suggested that in depression, the difference between the experimental groups and the control group (p=0.001) and the difference between the ACT and ST groups was significant (p=0.030). Moreover, respecting anxiety, the difference between the two experimental groups and the controls (p=0.001 & p=0.008, respectively) and the difference between the ACT and ST groups was significant (p=0.006). Furthermore, there were significant differences concerning stress between the ACT and ST groups and the control group (p=0.001) as well as between the ACT and ST groups (p=0.026).
Conclusion: Based on the present study findings, ACT and ST effectively reduced psychological distress in the examined women with BC; however, ACT was more effective than spiritual therapy in this respect.
Methods: This was a quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of this study included all patients with BC, referring to Dr. Gholami's Clinic in Kashmar City, Iran, in February 2020. Forty-Five eligible volunteers entered the study; they were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15); two experimental (ACT & ST), and one control groups. The inclusion criteria of the study were patients with BC (according to oncologists’ diagnosis), the age of 18-65 years, receiving chemotherapy for ≥1 month, no history of mental illness, having at least primary education (reading & writing abilities), no co-morbid physical illness, and patients’ consent and ability to attend all treatment sessions. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (Lavibund and Lavibund, 1995) were used in pretest and posttest phases to define and measure anxiety, depression, and stress in the study subjects. The ACT group received eight 75-minute training sessions two days a week according to a protocol developed by Hayes and associates (2006). The ST group participated in nine 75-minute training sessions two days a week. The protocol used in the ST group was adapted from the protocol developed by Richard and Bergin (2005). However, the controls received no intervention. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics, including univariate Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Bonferroni posthoc test in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The mean posttest scores of depression, anxiety, and stress (after controlling the pretest scores) were significantly higher in both research groups; thus, ACT and ST could effectively reduce depression (p<0.001), anxiety (p<0.001), and stress (p<0.001) in the study subjects. The ETA-squared value indicated that respectively >61%, >56%, and >66% of changes in the depression, anxiety, and stress components in women with BC could be explained by ACT and ST. Bonferroni test data suggested that in depression, the difference between the experimental groups and the control group (p=0.001) and the difference between the ACT and ST groups was significant (p=0.030). Moreover, respecting anxiety, the difference between the two experimental groups and the controls (p=0.001 & p=0.008, respectively) and the difference between the ACT and ST groups was significant (p=0.006). Furthermore, there were significant differences concerning stress between the ACT and ST groups and the control group (p=0.001) as well as between the ACT and ST groups (p=0.026).
Conclusion: Based on the present study findings, ACT and ST effectively reduced psychological distress in the examined women with BC; however, ACT was more effective than spiritual therapy in this respect.
Keywords: Acceptance and commitment therapy , Spirituality therapy , Breast cancer , Psychological distress
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. 1. Poorakbaran E, Mohammadi GhareGhozlou R, Mosavi SMR. Evaluate the effectiveness of therapy on cognitive emotion regulation spirituality in women with breast cancer. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2018;61(4):1122–36. [Persian] [DOI]
2. 2. Arch JJ, Mitchell JL, Genung SR, Fisher R, Andorsky DJ, Stanton AL. A randomized controlled trial of a group acceptance-based intervention for cancer survivors experiencing anxiety at re-entry ('Valued Living’): study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):89. [DOI]
3. 3. Lotfi Kashani F, Vaziri S, Esmaeil Akbari M, Zeinolabedini N, Sanaei H, Jamshidifar Z. The effectiveness of creating hope on distress of women with breast cancer. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;159:201–5. [DOI]
4. 4. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies – republished article. Behavior Therapy. 2016;47(6):869–85. [DOI]
5. 5. Noori-Daloii M, Kashani B. Targeted cancer therapy: review article. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2018;76(4):231–40. [Persian] [Article]
6. 6. Zarastvand A, Tizdast T, Khalatbari J, Abolghasemi S. The effectiveness of self-compassion focused therapy on marital self-regulation, marital burnout, and self-criticism in infertile women. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2020;17(4):594–605. [Persian] [Article]
7. 7. Soltanzadeh-Jazi F, Nilforooshan P, Abedi MR, Sadeghi A. The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on students’ career development with obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2019;16(3):264–71. [Persian] [Article]
8. 8. Harris AH, Thoresen CE, McCullough ME, Larson DB. Spiritually and religiously oriented health interventions. J Health Psychol. 1999;4(3):413–33. [DOI]
9. 9. Hayes SC, Pistorello J, Levin ME. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. The Counseling Psychologist. 2012;40(7):976–1002. [DOI]
10. 10. McCracken LM, Vowles KE. Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain: model, process, and progress. Am Psychol. 2014;69(2):178–87. [DOI]
11. 11. Kiani J, Jahanpour F, Abbasi F, Darvishi Sh, Gholizadeh B. Evaluation of effectiveness of spiritual therapy in mental health of cancer patients. Nursing of the Vulnerables. 2016;2(5):40–51. [Persian] [Article]
12. 12. Ghahari S, Imani S, Khademolreza N. Spirituality–religious techniques is an effective intervention for improvement coping strategy in women with breast cancer in Iran. Social Determinants of Health. 2018;4(1):50–1. [DOI]
13. 13. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9. [DOI]
14. 14. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1996.
15. 15. Samani S, Jokar B. A study on the reliability and validity of the short form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University. 2007;26(3):65–77. [Persian]
16. 16. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25. [DOI]
17. 17. Richards PS, Bergin AE. A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005, pp:127–9.
18. 18. Jafarizadeh F, Bahrainian M. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment group therapy on psychological flexibility and resilience of women with breast cancer. EbneSina. 2019;21(3):23–30. [Persian] [DOI]
19. 19. Azizi S, Rasool Zade Tabatabaie K, Janbozorgi M. Comparing the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on depression taking into account the level of psycho-spiritual development (case study). Clinical Psychology Studies. 2019;9(35):147–72. [Persian] [DOI]
20. 20. Hajsadeghi Z, Bassak Nejad S, Razmjoo S. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment group therapy on depression and anxiety among women with breast cancer. Pajouhan Scientific Journal. 2017;15(4):42–9. [Persian] [Article]
21. 21. Bolhari J, Dous Alivand H, Mirzaee M. Spiritual approach in medical education and humanities. Medical Ethics. 2012;6(20):101–25. [Persian] [DOI]
22. 22. Taghizadeh A, Pourali L, Vaziri Z, Saedi HR, Behdani F, Amel R. Psychological distress in cancer patients. Middle East Journal of Cancer. 2018;9(2):143–9. [Persian] [DOI]
23. 23. Kashani FL, Vaziri S, Esmaeil Akbari M, Jamshidifar Z, Mousavi M, Shirvani F. Spiritual interventions and distress in mothers of children with cancer. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;159:224–7. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
