Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 130 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Delkhosh V, Golmohammad Najad Bahrami G, Porkar H, Barghi I, Abdollahi Asl S, Bahari P. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mind Theory Training on Improving the Language Competence of Children With Intellectual Disabilities. MEJDS 2022; 12 :130-130
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2535-en.html
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mind Theory Training on Improving the Language Competence of Children With Intellectual Disabilities
Vaghef Delkhosh1 , Gholamreza Golmohammad Najad Bahrami *2 , Hamideh Porkar3 , Isa Barghi4 , Sayad Abdollahi Asl1 , Parvin Bahari1
1- MA in Educational Research, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
3- MA in Educational Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (1057 Views)

Background & Objectives: Mind and language distinguish humans from other creatures. Social cognition is among the factors shaping the child's personality. Social cognition has a multidimensional structure and includes areas such as empathy, social perception, information processing, document style, and theory of mind. In evolutionary psychology, the theory of mind has many topics. This structure refers to the ability to understand and attribute mental states such as wishes, knowledge, and desires to oneself and others. One of the problems of the mind is intellectual disability. Teaching mind theory is related to the cognitive and emotional processes of language. Many researchers have studied the theory of mind, but a few have examined the components of language skills. Can mind theory training explain the language skills of children with disabilities? This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of mind theory training in improving the linguistic abilities (syntax, semantics, and phonology) of children with teachable IQ. Also, the role of the gender variable was examined.
Methods: The method of the present study was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. By the available sampling method, 40 students (20 boys and 20 girls) were selected from 7– to 9–year–old students with teachable IQs living in Baneh City, Iran, in the 2018–2019 academic year. They were randomly divided into experimental and control groups (20 people each). The condition for conducting this research has a specific age and entry criteria, i.e., obtaining a suitable score (between 55 to 70) on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. The exclusion criterion was disagreement and willingness to continue participating and being absent from training sessions. The language test of TOLD–p3 (Hassanzadeh and Minaei, 2000) was used to collect information in the pretest and posttest for two groups. The reason for using this tool is the comprehensiveness of this test in measuring language development. This test includes 225 items and 9 subtests (6 main and 3 supplementary subtests). The main subtests include visual vocabulary, relational vocabulary, oral vocabulary, grammatical comprehension, sentence imitation, and grammatical completion. Subtests include word differentiation, phonological analysis, and word production. The experimental group was trained in mind theory for 16 sessions twice a week for 20 to 30 minutes. The test was performed again on both groups. The obtained data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of covariance and 2–factor multivariate analysis of covariance) at a significance level of 0.05 in SPSS software version 24.
Results: The results of multivariate analysis of covariance showed that theory of mind training was effective in improving the syntactic ability (p=0.002) and semantic ability (p<0.001) of students with teachable intellectual disabilities. However, it had no significant effect on improving phonological ability (p=0.068). The results of the 2–factor multivariate analysis of covariance related to changes in group and gender interaction were not significant (p=0.350). Therefore, teaching theory of mind does not affect the language abilities of students with intellectual disabilities by gender.
Conclusions: Mental and language functions are very important in students with intellectual disabilities. According to the study results, through teaching theory of mind, the syntactic and semantic ability of students with intellectual disabilities can be improved. Therefore, it is recommended to use mind theory training in students' exceptional centers.

Keywords: Theory of mind, Language, Phonological skills, Syntactic skills, Semantic skills
Full-Text [PDF 551 kb]   (364 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation
References
1. Doherty MJ. Theory of mind: how children understand other's thoughts and feelings? Khanjani Z, Hadavand Khani F. (Persian translator). Tehran: Samt Publications; 2020.
2. Atkinson RL, Atkinson RC, Smith EE, Bem DJ, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Zamineye ravanshenasi Hilgard [Hilgard's introduction to psychology]. Barahani MN, Birashk B, Beyk M, Zamani R, Shamloo S, Shar Aray M, et al. (Persian translator). Tehran: Roshd Publication; 2012. [Persian]
3. Dadsetan P. Language disorders assessment and treatment (developmental psychopathology vol 3). Tehran: Samt Publications; 2012. [Persian]
4. Grady CL, Keightley ML. Studies of altered social cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders using functional neuroimaging. Can J Psychiatry. 2002;47(4):327–36. [DOI]
5. Coundouris SP, Adams AG, Henry JD. Empathy and theory of mind in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;109:92–102. [DOI]
6. Yaghoubi H, Ahmadi E, Maleki M. Comparison of mind theory and decision-making process between Parkinson's disease patients and normal people. Journal of Psychological Science. 2020;19(85):47–55. [Persian] [Article]
7. Symons DK. Mental state discourse, theory of mind, and the internalization of self–other understanding. Developmental Review. 2004;24(2):159–88. [DOI]
8. Moosavi SK, Amiri Majd M, Bazzazian S. A comparison of theory of mind between children with autism, intellectual disability, ADHD, and normal children. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2014;4(2):43–51.[Persian] [Article]
9. Bayati H, Pourmohamadrezatajrishi M, Zademohamadi A. The effectiveness of drama therapy on attention span in boy students with intellectual disability. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2012;4(1):75–85. [Persian] [Article]
10. Hemmati Alamdarloo G, BehPajooh A, Afrooz GA, Ghobari Bonab B, Moosapour N. Tarrahi rahnamaye barnameye darsi maharat haye pish herfe'ei baraye danesh amoozan ba natavani hooshi dar doreye ebtedaei [Designing a pre professional skills curriculum guide for students with intellectual disabilities in elementary schools]. Journal of Curriculum Research. 2013;2(1):1–31. [Persian] [DOI]
11. Ansari Nezhad S, Molly G, Adib Sershaki N. The effectiveness of theory of mind training on the promotion of theory of mind levels in educable intellectual disability students. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling. 2011;1(2):105–20. [Persian] [Article]
12. Ghorbani N, Jabbari S. The effect of training theory of mind on executive function of boy students with learning disabilities. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2018;8(31):259–37. [Persian] [Article]
13. Mikaeili N, Esmaeili M. Comparison theory of mind and executive function in the students with learning disabilities and normal. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2016;6(21):100–81. [Persian] [Article]
14. Saeedi C. Barrasiye tahavol nazariye zehn va rabeteye aan ba maharat haye zabani va maharat haye ejtemaei koodakan narasa khan [Investigating the evolution of the theory of mind and its relationship with the language skills and social skills of dyslexic children] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Razi University; 2013. [Persian]
15. Modir Khazani M. Mo'allefe haye zabani va tavanaei nazariye zehn dar koodakan dore pish dabestani [Linguistic components and ability of theory of mind in preschool children] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Al-Zahra University; 2012. [Persian]
16. Gall MD, Borg WR, Gall JP. Educational research: an introduction. 6th edition. US: Longman Pub; 1996.
17. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition. American Psychological Association; 2012. [DOI]
18. Shahim S. Barrasiye form haya kootah meghyas Wechsler koodakan baraye estefade dar Iran [Examining the short forms of the Wechsler children's scale for use in Iran]. Journal of Social and Human Sciences of Shiraz University. 1994;9(2):67–79. [Persian]
19. Newcomer PL, Hammill DD. Azmoon roshd zaban 3: Told – P (Newcomer va Hammill): entebagh va hanjaryabi [TOLD-P language development test: 3 (Newcomer and Hammill): adaptation and standardization]. Hassanzadeh S, Minaei A. (Persian translator). Tehran: Ministry of Education, Research Institute of Education Studies; 2009. [Persian]
20. Muris P, Steerneman P, Meesters C, Merckelbach H, Horselenberg R, van den Hogen T, et al. The TOM test: a new instrument for assessing theory of mind in normal children and children with pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999;29(1):67–80. [DOI]
21. Ghamrani A, Alborzi Sh, Khayyer M. Barrasiye ravayi va etebar azmoon nazariye zehn dar gruhi az daneshamoozan aghabmande zahni va aadi shahr Shiraz [Examining the validity and reliability of the theory of mind test in a group of mentally retarded and normal students in Shiraz]. Journal of Psychology. 2006;10(2):181-99. [Persian]
22. Poursalemiyan Sh. Asar bakhshiye amoozesh takalif nazariye zehn bar maharat zaban va raftar sazeshi danesh amoozan natavan zehni [The effectiveness of teaching theory of mind assignments on language skills and adaptive behavior of mentally disabled students] [Thesis for MSc]. [Isfahan, Iran]: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Isfahan; 2012. [Persian]
23. Tager-Flusberg H, Joseph RM. How language facilitates the acquisition of false-belief understanding in children with autism. In: Astington JW, Baird JA; editors. why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford University Press; 2005. [DOI]
24. Milligan K, Astington JW, Dack LA. Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Dev. 2007;78(2):622–46. [DOI]
25. Ebert S. Theory of mind, language, and reading: Developmental relations from early childhood to early adolescence. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020;191:104739. [DOI]
26. Hughes C. Theory of mind grows up: Reflections on new research on theory of mind in middle childhood and adolescence. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016;149:1–5. [DOI]
27. Ghamrani A, Alborzi Sh. Barrasiye tahvaoli teori zehn dar koodakan aghab mandeye zehni khafif va koodakan aadi 7 ta 9 sale [Developmental study of theory of mind in mildly mentally retarded children and normal children aged 7 to 9 years]. Psychological Studies. 2006;1(4):5–28. [Persian] [DOI]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb