Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 217 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Satori F, Amiri Majd M, Tajalli P, Abolmaali K. The Effectiveness of Reality Therapy Program on Psychological Well-being, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Interpersonal Relationships of Mothers of Children With Developmental Disabilities. MEJDS 2022; 12 :217-217
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2610-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Abhar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
Abstract:   (1061 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: According to the American Psychiatric Association, developmental disabilities are a group of disabilities related to the developmental stages of childhood that occur with varying degrees of severity at birth. Given the prevalence of psychological distress among mothers with children with developmental disabilities and its negative effects on their individual and family functioning, it seems that providing psychological services in the form of treatment strategies such as reality therapy can regulate emotion, interpersonal relationships, and the psychological well–being of these mothers. Also, as the literature review showed, the effect of the mentioned intervention on the research variables in the target population, as far as the researcher examined, no direct study has been done, and a research vacuum is felt in this field. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of reality therapy programs on psychological well–being, cognitive emotion regulation, and interpersonal relationships of mothers of children with developmental disabilities.
Methods: The present study was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population of this study included all mothers of children with developmental disabilities in Saqez City, Iran, in 2020–2019. Since at least 15 people were recommended for each group in the experimental methods, 30 mothers were selected from the eligible volunteers and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Finally, the experimental group was trained in a reality therapy program, and the control group did not receive any intervention. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no history of mental illness and use of psychotropic drugs, no use of psychological interventions and other counseling, no psychotic disorders, dementia and mental retardation, alertness and ability to participate in mindfulness sessions, and ability to speak in Persian. The exclusion criteria included absence for more than two sessions in the treatment protocol and unwillingness to continue cooperating in training sessions. Finally, individuals were assured that all information was confidential and would be used for research purposes. For privacy reasons, participants' first and last names were not registered. The study data were obtained by the Ryff Scale Psychological Well–being (RSPWB, Revised Ryff, 1995), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski, Kraaij, 2006), and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Questionnaire (PII–32, Barkham, 1996) before and after the reality treatment. The obtained data were analyzed with univariate analyses of covariance in SPSS23. The significance level was considered 0.005.
Results: The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check the normality of the data before the analysis of covariance. The results showed that the assumption of normality was valid for psychological well–being data (p=0.922), interpersonal problems (p=0.782), and cognitive emotion regulation (p=0.686). The results of Levene's test for homogeneity of variance of psychological welfare dependent variable (p=0.909), interpersonal problems (p=0.556), and self–cognitive emotion regulation include two subgroups: adapted strategies (p=0.694) and uncompromising solutions (F=0.067, p=0.798). The results of Levene's test showed no significant difference in the variance of the groups, and therefore the assumption of the equality of variance was established. The results of the test assumed the homogeneity of the regression slope in the groups for the variables of psychological well–being (p=0.100), interpersonal problems (p=0.415), and cognitive emotion regulation (p=0.639), which shows that the default. The homogeneity of the regression slope based on the non–significance of the group*pretest interaction is confirmed. Therefore, the regression homogeneity assumption was established, and it can be ensured that the data of this study meet the assumptions underlying the analysis of variance. Also, the results of univariate analysis of covariance on the mean posttest scores of dependent variables with pretest control in the experimental and control groups showed that reality therapy training had a positive and significant effect on cognitive regulation, which increased the compromised strategies (p=0.002) and decreased the uncompromising strategies (p=0.003) in individuals. This treatment also increased psychological well–being (p=0.012) and decreased interpersonal problems in individuals (p=0.002).
Conclusion: In general, the results showed a significant difference between cognitive regulation of emotion, psychological well–being, and interpersonal relationships of mothers of children with developmental disabilities in the experimental and control groups. Therefore, using a reality therapy program alone or combined with other therapies can reduce psychological problems, regulate emotions, and improve mothers' relationships with children with developmental disabilities.

Full-Text [PDF 429 kb]   (335 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Gogoi RR, Kumar R, Deuri SP. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in mothers of children with intellectual disability. Open Jour of Psych & Allied Scie. 2017;8(1):71. [DOI]
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
3. Paterson J, Iusitini L, Gao W. Child developmental assessment at two-years of age: data from the Pacific Islands families study. Pac Health Dialog. 2011;17(2):51–63.
4. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30(8):1311–27. [DOI]
5. Roberton T, Daffern M, Bucks RS. Emotion regulation and aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2012 Jan 1;17(1):72–82. [DOI]
6. Zimmermann FF, Burrell B, Jordan J. The acceptability and potential benefits of mindfulness-based interventions in improving psychological well-being for adults with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;30:68–78. [DOI]
7. Fath N, Azad Fallah P, Rasool-zadeh Tabatabaei SK, Rahimi C. Validity and reliability of the inventory of interpersonal problems (IIP-32). Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2013;5(3):69–80. [Persian] [DOI]
8. Austad C. Counseling and psychotherapy today. Firoozbakht M. (Persian translator). Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2011, p:520.
9. Bhargava R. The use of reality therapy with a depressed deaf adult. Clinical Case Studies. 2013;12(5):388–96. [DOI]
10. Farmani F, Taghavi H, Fatemi A, Safavi S. The efficacy of group reality therapy on reducing stress, anxiety and depression in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences. 2015;2(4):33–8. [DOI]
11. Benbow AA, Anderson PL. A meta-analytic examination of attrition in virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2019;61:18–26. [DOI]
12. Gholami R, Naemi A. Effectiveness of reality therapy on the stigma of mothers of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2017;7(27):209–36. [Persian] [DOI]
13. Heydarpour S, Parvane E, Saqqezi A, Ziapour A, Dehghan F, Parvaneh A. Effectiveness of group counseling based on the reality therapy on resilience and psychological well-being of mothers with an intellectual disabled child. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;6(6):7851–60. [DOI]
14. Boeldt D, McMahon E, McFaul M, Greenleaf W. Using virtual reality exposure therapy to enhance treatment of anxiety disorders: Identifying areas of clinical adoption and potential obstacles. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:773. [DOI]
15. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2009. [Persian]
16. Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):719–27. [DOI]
17. Michaeli Manee F. The study of Ryff psychological well-being scale factorial structure between Urmia university students. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches. 2010;5(18):143–65. [Persian] [Article]
18. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire – development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;41(6):1045–53. [DOI]
19. Besharat MA, Bazzazian S. Psychometri properties of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire in a sample of Iranian population. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery. 2015;24(84):61–70. [Persian] [Article]
20. Barkham M, Hardy GE, Startup M. The IIP-32: a short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996;35(1):21–35. [DOI]
21. Glasser W. Counseling with choice therapy: the new reality therapy. New York: Harper Collins; 2001.
22. Eslami R, Hashemian P, Jarahi L, Modarres Gharavi M. Effectiveness of group reality therapy on happiness and quality of life in unsupervised adolescents in Mashhad. Med J Mashhad Uni Med Sci 2013;56(5):300–6. [Persian]
23. Morazadeh S, Veiskarami H, Mirdekoovand F, Ghadampoor E, Ghazanfari F. Studying and comparing the effectiveness of real therapy and positive psychotherapy on reducing gifted girl students' perfectionism and academic stress. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2019;9(34):79–110. [Persian] [DOI]
24. Beidel DC, Frueh BC, Neer SM, Bowers CA, Trachik B, Uhde TW, et al. Trauma management therapy with virtual-reality augmented exposure therapy for combat-related PTSD: A randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;61:64–74. [DOI]
25. Kim NR, Jang MH. Effects of self-assertive training applying reality therapy techniques on self-esteem and internalized stigma in schizophrenia patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2019;28(1):37. [DOI]
26. Rodríguez-Hernández M, Criado-Álvarez JJ, Corregidor-Sánchez AI, Martín-Conty JL, Mohedano-Moriano A, Polonio-López B. Effects of virtual reality-based therapy on quality of life of patients with subacute stroke: A three-month follow-up randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2810. [DOI]
27. Hajikaram A, Ghamari M, Amirimajd M. Comparison between the effects of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy and group-based reality therapy on work-family conflict & psychological well-being of married female staffs. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. 2019;24(3):20–33. [Persian] [DOI]
28. da Silva TD, Fontes AMGG, de Oliveira-Furlan BS, Roque TT, Lima AII, de Souza BMM, et al. Effect of combined therapy of virtual reality and transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: A study protocol for a triple-blinded randomized controlled crossover trial. Front Neurol. 2020;11:953. [DOI]
29. Eskandari M, Bahmani B, Saghayian A, Asgari A. Effectiveness of reality therapy group on psychological well-being of female headed households. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling. 2016;5(2):5–15. [Persian] [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb