Determining the Effectiveness of Schema Therapy on Psychological Distress, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Emotional Self-regulation in Women with Multiple Sclerosis Referred to MS Society of Tehran City, Iran

Shirin, Zahra; Abolghasemi, Shahnam; Rahmani, Mohammad Ali; Ghorban Shiroudi, Shohreh

Volume 13 - Articles-1402 MEJDS (2023) 13: 31 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Shirin Z, Abolghasemi S, Rahmani M A, Ghorban Shiroudi S. Determining the Effectiveness of Schema Therapy on Psychological Distress, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Emotional Self-regulation in Women with Multiple Sclerosis Referred to MS Society of Tehran City, Iran. MEJDS 2023; 13 :31-31
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2696-en.html

Determining the Effectiveness of Schema Therapy on Psychological Distress, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Emotional Self-regulation in Women with Multiple Sclerosis Referred to MS Society of Tehran City, Iran

Zahra Shirin¹

, Shahnam Abolghasemi ^*²

, Mohammad Ali Rahmani³

, Shohreh Ghorban Shiroudi²

1- PhD Student in Counseling, Department of Psychology and Counseling, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran

Abstract: (1168 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease affecting the patients' physical conditions and limiting their activities. Patients with MS are more intolerant of uncertainty than the general population. This construct includes beliefs about anxiety, negative orientation towards the problem, and avoidant coping style. Psychological helplessness is another psychological problem that manifests itself in people with inflammation. Psychological helplessness refers to a specific distress and emotional state that people may experience temporarily or permanently in response to the pressures and problems of life. Emotional self–regulation is one of the strategies to deal with psychological problems caused by chronic diseases, specifically multiple sclerosis. People with MS experience more problems in emotional regulation than healthy people, which predicts lower quality of life. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of schema therapy on psychological helplessness, intolerance of uncertainty, and emotional self–regulation in women with MS referred to the MS Society of Tehran City, Iran.
Methods: The research method was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population comprised women with MS referred to the MS Society of Tehran in 2017 for counseling and treatment. The number of these people was 4816. Thus, according to the list provided by the Tehran MS Society to the researcher, 357 people entered the study voluntarily. The required number of samples was calculated based on similar studies, considering the effect size of 0.40, confidence level of 0.95, test power of 0.80, and the rate of loss of 10% for each group of 15 people. The inclusion criteria include women aged 20 to 45 years, with minimum diploma education, who have suffered from MS for at least one year, and whose illness was diagnosed by a qualified physician, with the results of diagnostic tests such as MRI in the case of MS Confirmed. Also, people whose disease had reached a severe stage or those absent from the intervention sessions for more than three sessions were excluded from the study process. The study participants responded to the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) (Freeston et al., 1994), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995), and Emotional Self–Regulation Questionnaire (Hofmann & Kashdan, 2010) in the pretest and posttest phases. The schema therapy group received group intervention in 8 sessions of 45 minutes, and the control group was placed on a waiting list. Centrality and dispersion indices such as mean and standard deviation were used to describe the data. The independent t test and univariate covariance analysis were used to analyze the data. The mentioned statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 24 software. The significance level of the tests was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The results showed that schema therapy reduces the variable components of psychological helplessness, including stress, anxiety, and depression (p<0.001), relieving the variable components of uncertainty intolerance, including the stressfulness of indecision, the inability to take action, the negativity of unexpected events and their avoidance, and uncertainty about The future (p<0.001), and the increasing of emotional self–regulation variable components, including secrecy, compromise and tolerance (p<0.001) in the women of the experimental group with MS.
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, schema therapy effectively reduces psychological helplessness and uncertainty intolerance and increases the emotional self–regulation of women with MS. This treatment can improve the psychological problems of patients with MS.

Keywords: Schema therapy, Psychological helplessness, Uncertainty intolerance, Emotional self–regulation, Multiple sclerosis

Full-Text [PDF 519 kb] (322 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Bansi J, Bloch W, Gamper U, Kesselring J. Training in MS: influence of two different endurance training protocols (aquatic versus overland) on cytokine and neurotrophin concentrations during three week randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2013;19(5):613–21. [DOI]

2. Marzullo A, Kocevar G, Stamile C, Durand-Dubief F, Terracina G, Calimeri F, Sappey-Marinier D. Classification of multiple sclerosis clinical profiles via graph convolutional neural networks. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:594. [DOI]

3. Buhr K, Dugas MJ. The role of fear of anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty in worry: an experimental manipulation. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(3):215–23. [DOI]

4. Rezaei Shad A, Soltani Asl Haris S. Path analysis of the relationship between uncertainty intolerance and worry in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with cognitive avoidance mediation. Journal of Psychology New Ideas. 2021;10(14):1-10. [Persian] [Article]

5. Jerath R, Crawford MW, Barnes VA, Harden K. Self-regulation of breathing as a primary treatment for anxiety. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015;40(2):107–15. [DOI]

6. Carvalho T, Sousa-Mendes A, Gomes C, Guedes C. Understanding stress in patients with multiple sclerosis: the joint predictive role of disease characteristics and emotion regulation processes. Eur Psychiatr. 2021;64(S1):S464–5. [DOI]

7. Mizara A, Papadopoulos L, McBride SR. Core beliefs and psychological distress in patients with psoriasis and atopic eczema attending secondary care: the role of schemas in chronic skin disease. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(5):986–93. [DOI]

8. Margo-Dermer E, Dépelteau A, Girard A, Hudon C. Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review. Public Health. 2019;172:1–7. [DOI]

9. Schirda BL. Examining the role of trait mindfulness and emotion regulation in quality of life in multiple sclerosis [Thesis for MSc]. [Ohio, US]: The Ohio State University; 2014.

10. Robichaud M, Koerner N, Dugas MJ. Cognitive behavioral treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: from science to practice. Second edition. New York: Routledge; 2019.

11. Turner MJ, Aspin G, Gillman J. Maladaptive schemas as a potential mechanism through which irrational beliefs relate to psychological distress in athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;44:9–16. [DOI]

12. Priemer M, Talbot F, French DJ. Impact of self-help schema therapy on psychological distress and early maladaptive schemas: a randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Change. 2015;32(1):59–73. [DOI]

13. Farhadi M, Vaziri Sh, Pasandideh MM. Evaluation of effectiveness of mindfulness, logotherapy, and schema therapy on stress, anxiety, and depression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Iranian Journal of Health Psychology. 2021;4(2):21–32. [Persian] [DOI]

14. Farhadi M, Pasandideh MM, Vaziri Sh. Evaluation of the effectiveness of schema therapy on reducing stress, anxiety, depression and increasing self-efficacy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Psychology & Personality. 2022;19(2):57–69. [Persian] [Article]

15. Shahab A, Ahadi H, Jomehri F, Kraskian-Mujembari A. The effectiveness of group emotional schema therapy on subjective, well-being, fatigue of patients with multiple sclerosis in Shiraz. Psychological Methods and Models. 2020;10(38):77–96. [Persian] [Article]

16. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

17. Freeston MH, Rhéaume J, Letarte H, Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R. Why do people worry? Pers Individ Dif. 1994;17(6):791–802. [DOI]

18. Buhr K, Dugas MJ. Investigating the construct validity of intolerance of uncertainty and its unique relationship with worry. J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(2):222–36. [DOI]

19. Zangoulechi Z, Yousefi Z, Keshavarz N. The role of anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the prediction of cyberchondria. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine. 2018;6(4):1–6. [Persian] [DOI]

20. Asghari A, Saed F, Dibajnia P. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a non-clinical Iranian sample. International Journal of Psychology. 2008;2(2):82–102.

21. Hofmann SG, Kashdan TB. The Affective Style Questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010;32(2):255–63. [DOI]

22. Borjkhanloo S, Farghadani A. The difference between cognitive, affective and behavioral jealousy and affective styles among unfaithful, betrayed women and women with no experience of betrayal. Journal of Woman & Society. 2018;9(35):1–6. [Persian] [Article]

23. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: a practitioner's guide. New York: The Guilford Press; 2003.

24. Varmazyar A, Makvandi B, Seraj Khorrami N. Effectiveness of schema therapy in social anxiety, rumination, and psychological well-being among depressed patients referred to health centers in Abadan, Iran. Razavi International Journal of Medicine. 2021;9(1):32–9. [Persian] [Article]

25. Khoshnevis E, Ahmadzadeh S, Zomorodi S. The effectiveness of schema therapy-based training on generalized anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty and cognitive distortion in university students. Health and Development Journal. 2018;7(3):250–61. [Persian] [Article]

26. Mohammadi S, Hafezi F, Ehteshamzadeh P, Eftekhar Saadi Z, Bakhtiarpour S. Effectiveness of schema therapy and emotional self-regulation therapy in the components of women's marital conflicts. Journal of Client-centered Nursing Care. 2020;6(4):277–88. [Persian] [DOI]

27. Ahovan M, Jajarmi M, Bakhshipoor A. Comparing the effectiveness of schema therapy (ST) and emotional schema therapy (EST) on clinical syndromes of individuals with obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2020;28(3):239–50. [Persian] [DOI]