The Relationship Between Gender Roles and Perceived Equity on Marital Conflicts in Married Women

Ameri, Farideh; Shirazi, Soosan; Zahraei, Shaghayegh

Volume 13 - Articles-1402 MEJDS (2023) 13: 166 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.ALZAHRA.REC.1400.025

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Ameri F, Shirazi S, Zahraei S. The Relationship Between Gender Roles and Perceived Equity on Marital Conflicts in Married Women. MEJDS 2023; 13 :166-166
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2807-en.html

The Relationship Between Gender Roles and Perceived Equity on Marital Conflicts in Married Women

Farideh Ameri¹

, Soosan Shirazi ^*²

, Shaghayegh Zahraei¹

1- Assistant Professor of Psychology Faculty, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2- Architect and MA Student of Clinical Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract: (1218 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Marital conflicts manifest in Iran by a significant increase in the number of registered divorces. There are several findings on the causes of marital disputes. Most marital conflicts of a couple are caused by the inequality of involvement and participation of men in family affairs, compared to women, which is based on gender stereotypes. These stereotypes usually mean unequal share in the married life of a man and a woman. So, gender roles and equity are two critical factors that cause conflicts. In today's world, gender patterns are changing because traditional gender patterns can be restrictive and discriminatory for men and women. Therefore, it seems that research is needed to examine the current characteristics of femininity and masculinity and perceived fairness in the marital conflicts of Iranian women. So, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between gender roles and perceived equity in marital conflicts in married women.
Methods: This is a descriptive correlational study. A total of 404 married women aged 25 to 40 years, living in Tehran City, Iran, with at least one child, were chosen by available sampling. The inclusion criteria were their length of marriage of at least 1 year and at most 21 years, between 25 and 40 years old, having at least one child, and living in Tehran. The exclusion criteria were incomplete completion of the questionnaires and declaration of addiction or unemployment of the spouse. Because of the coronavirus pandemic in the country, the samples virtually completed the Sex Role Questionnaire–Short Form (Bem, 1981), Revised Marital Conflict Questionnaire (Sanai et al., 2008), and Perceived Equity Measurement (Perry, 2004). Data analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation, eta–squared correlation, 1–way ANOVA, and multiple regression in SPSS26 software at the significance level of α=0.05.
Results: Most respondents (304 women) had one child. Their average length of marriage was 8.68 years. In gender role classification, the highest frequency was in women in the androgynous category, and the lowest was in the undifferentiated category. The results of the Pearson correlation showed a significant negative relationship between masculinity and marital conflicts of married women (r=–0.50, p<0.01). Also, there was a significant negative relationship between perceived equity and marital conflicts of married women (r=–0.54, p<0.01). We found a relationship between gender roles and marital conflicts (F=21.40, p<0.001). In addition, there was also a relationship between perceived equity and gender role (F=8.73, p<0.001). The results of 1–way ANOVA showed a significant difference between the means of marital conflicts in married women due to their gender roles and also a significant difference between the mean value of perceived equity in married women due to their gender roles. The mean value of marital conflicts of women with a feminine gender role was significantly higher than the marital conflicts of women with masculine and androgynous gender roles (p<0.001). The mean value of perceived equity of married women with masculine and androgynous gender roles was significantly higher than the perceived equity of married women with feminine gender role (p<0.001). The results of multiple regression showed that masculinity and perceived equity explained 42% of the variance of marital conflicts.
Conclusion: Gender role is a determining factor in predicting women's marital conflicts. Breaking gender stereotypes along with equity and understanding equal human rights will be a big step in reducing relationship conflicts.

Keywords: Perceived fairness, Marital conflicts, Married women, Perceived equity, Gender role

Full-Text [PDF 494 kb] (235 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Fruzzetti AE. The high–conflict couple: a dialectical behavior therapy guide to finding peace, intimacy & validation. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications; 2006.

2. Civil Status Registry Organization. Marriage and divorce statistics [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 May]; Available at: [Article]

3. Cowan CP, Cowan PA. When partners become parents: the big life change for couples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.

4. Fincham FD, Bradbury TN. The psychology of marriage: basic issues and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 1990.

5. Hawkins AJ, Willoughby BJ, Doherty WJ. Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2012;53(6):453–63. [DOI]

6. Sanai B. Family and marriage scales. Tehran: Besat Pub; 2008. [Persian]

7. Gottman JM. The marriage clinic: a scientifically–based marital therapy. New York: W.W.Norton; 1999.

8. Wright JD. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015.

9. Goldenberg I, Stanton M, Goldenberg H. Family therapy: an overview. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2000.

10. Tannen D. You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow; 2007.

11. Faulkner RA, Davey M, Davey A. Gender–related predictors of change in marital satisfaction and marital conflict. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2005;33(1):61–83. [DOI]

12. Bourne H. Gender ideology, depression, and marital quality in working–class, dual–earner couples across the transition to parenthood [Ph.D. dissertation]. [Massachusetts, US]: University of Massachusetts Amherst; 2006.

13. Perry BJ. The relationship between equity and marital quality among Hispanics, African Americans and Caucasians [Ph.D. dissertation]. [Ohio, US]: Ohio State University; 2004.

14. Jacobson NS, Fruzzetti AE, Dobson K, Whisman M, Hops H. Couple therapy as a treatment for depression: II. the effects of relationship quality and therapy on depressive relapse. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(3):516–9. [DOI]

15. Mohammadi R, Mohammadi M. Prediction of marital satisfaction based on gender roles. In: The 5th Congress of the Iranian Psychological Association [Internet]. Tehran, Iran: Iranian Psychological Association; 2015. [Article]

16. Ojeda A, Melby L, Sánchez V, Rodarte M. Correlation between masculinity and femininity traits and marital satisfaction among Mexican immigrants. Migración y Desarrollo. 2007;5(1):48–65.

17. Hoffman RM, Borders L, Hattie J. Reconceptualizing femininity and masculinity: From gender roles to gender self-confidence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 2000;15:475–503.

18. Abolqasemi A, Sheybanl H, Narirnanl M, Ganji M. Relationship of androgyny and neuroticism with quality of life in infertile and fertile women. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2008;6(2):47–61. [Persian] [DOI]

19. Martin CL, Cook RE, Andrews NCZ. Reviving androgyny: a modern day perspective on flexibility of gender identity and behavior. Sex Roles. 2017;76(9):592–603. [DOI]

20. Khojasteh Mehr R, Faramarzi S, Rajabi G. The role of equity perception in marital quality in married employees in Ahvaz organizations. Journal of Psychological Studies. 2012;8(1):31–50. [Persian] [DOI]

21. Abbaspour Z, Ghanbari Z. The study of the direct and indirect effect of sexism on marital satisfaction mediation with perceived equity. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2019;9(4):127–40. [Persian] [DOI]

22. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970;30(3):607–10. [DOI]

23. Bem SL. Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review. 1981;88:354–64. [DOI]

24. Brems C, Johnson ME. Reexamination of the bem sex–role inventory: the interpersonal BSRI. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1990;55(3–4):484–98. [DOI]

25. Hoffman RM, Borders LD. Twenty–five years after the bem sex–role inventory: a reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2001;34(1):39–55. [DOI]

26. Aliakbari M, Mohtashmi T, Hasanzadeh P. The study of psychometric characteristics in short form Bem's sex–role inventory with emphasis on factor analysis in Iranian population. Social Cognition. 2013;1(1):44–58. [Persian] [Article]

27. Bem SL. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974;42:155–62. [DOI]

28. Mickelson KD, Claffey ST, Williams SL. The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2006;55:73–82. [DOI]

29. Ehteshamzadeh P. Women's gender role development and family sanity. Woman and Culture. 2010;1(3):51–65. [Persian] [Article]

30. Feldman L. Sex–role issues in marital therapy. In: Jacobson NS, Gurman AS, editors. Clinical handbook of marital therapy. New York: Guilford Press; 1986. pp: 345–59.

31. Rua T, Aytug Z, Simarasl N, Lin L. How traditional gender roles hurt both women and men: negative processes and outcomes in mixed–gender negotiations. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2020;36(2):271–93. [DOI]

32. Bem SL. The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press; 1993.

33. Nazari R, Sardaripoor M, Kakavand A, Mansobifar M. The relationship between personality traits, marital stability, and equality perception. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:73. [Persian] [Article]

34. Sabatelli RM, Shehan CL. Exchange and resource theories. In: Sourcebook of family theories and methods: a contextual approach. New York, NY, US: Plenum Press; 1993. pp: 385–417. [DOI]

35. Frisco ML, Williams K. Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues. 2003;24(1):51–73. [DOI]

36. Grote NK, Clark MS. Perceiving unfairness in the family: cause or consequence of marital distress? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80(2):281–93. [DOI]

37. Wilkie JR, Ferree MM, Ratcliff KS. Gender and fairness: marital satisfaction in two–earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1998;60(3):577–94. [DOI]

38. McLeod JD, Nonnemaker JN. Social stratification and inequality. In: Aneshensel CS, Phelan JC. Handbook of sociology of mental health. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. pp: 321–44.

39. Çopur Z, Gürel B. Gender differences in determinants of family life, marital quality, and marital. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences. 2020;11(40):358–79. [DOI]

40. Jahani Dolatabad E. Study of gender differences in marital attitudes (Tehran case study). In: National conference on family changes and its challenges in Iran [Internet]. Tehran, Iran: Alzahra University; 2016. [Persian] [Article]

41. Khojastemehr R, Ahmadi Ghuzluje A, Soudani M, Shiralinia K. The effectiveness of Fairness–based contextual therapy on emotional intimacy and marital quality of couples. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015;9(3):79–96. [Persian] [Article]

42. Khamse A. Gender roles patterning and cultural stereotypes in girl students. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2004;2(6):115–34. [Persian] [DOI]