Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 164 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jamshidi F, Aghaei H, Razeghi N, Nouhi S. Preparing the Model of Irrational Eating Beliefs Based on Cognitive Distortion with the Mediating Role of Rejection Sensitivity in People with Binge Eating Symptoms. MEJDS 2023; 13 :164-164
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2888-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tafresh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tafresh, Iran
Abstract:   (938 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The most common eating disorder is binge eating, which is seen in obese or overweight people. Therefore, investigating the role of different variables in people with binge eating symptoms seems necessary. The increase in eating disorders in the second half of the 20th century is astonishing and is not culture–specific but becoming global. This disorder used to be a problem in Western countries, but today, China and Japan are as affected as America is. In addition, the gender and age of people with this disorder are distinctive, and this topic makes the investigation of their causes more interesting. Regarding the etiology of this disorder, unlike most other disorders, social and cultural factors play a more significant role than psychological and biological factors. Therefore, the present study aimed to present a model of irrational eating beliefs based on cognitive distortion with the mediating role of sensitivity to rejection in people with binge eating symptoms.
Methods: This research is analytical in nature and uses structural equation modeling. The statistical population of this study comprised all people with symptoms of binge eating who were referred to counseling centers in districts 6 and 12 of Tehran City, Iran, in 2021. To select the sample size in modeling research, 15 people are needed for each obvious variable. Considering 7 obvious variables in the conceptual model, 105 people were required in this research. However, due to the dropout and the possibility of not completing all the questions of the questionnaires by the participants, 200 questionnaires were distributed among the study population. Of whom, 185 questionnaires were completed, returned, and analyzed. Scales were used to collect data. The criteria for entering the research included obtaining a higher than average score in the Binge Eating Severity Questionnaire, bearing at least a diploma level of education, subjects not suffering from a specific physical disease or psychological disorder, and not undergoing psychological treatment or particular medication. The exclusion criterion included non–cooperation in completing the questionnaires. The study data were gathered via the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale (Hamamci & Büyüköztürk, 2004), Rejection Sensitivity Scale (Downey & Feldman, 1996), and Irrational Food Beliefs Questionnaire (Osberg et al., 2008). The Pearson correlation and structural equation modeling were used for data analysis in SPSS version 24 and Amos version 24. The significance level of all tests was set at 0.05.
Results: Examining the coefficients of the direct relationships between different paths showed that cognitive distortion and sensitivity to rejection (p<0.001, β=0.55) and sensitivity to rejection and irrational eating beliefs (p<0.001, β=0.61) had a significant direct relationship. However, there was no direct relationship between cognitive distortion and irrational eating beliefs (p=0.968, β=0.003). Also, the indirect effect of cognitive distortion on irrational eating beliefs with the mediating role of sensitivity to rejection was equal to 0.065 (p=0.001). The goodness of fit indices of the fitted conceptual model were as follows: CMIN/df=3.09, GFI=0.96, NFI=0.97, and RMSEA=0.082.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, sensitivity to rejection in people with binge eating symptoms mediates the relationship between cognitive distortions and irrational eating beliefs.

Full-Text [PDF 390 kb]   (238 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Giordano S. Eating disorders and the media. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(6):478–82. [DOI]
2. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P. Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. Rezaie F. (Persian translator). Tehran: Arjmand Publication; 2016, pp: 111–27.
3. Hill ML, Masuda A, Latzman RD. Body image flexibility as a protective factor against disordered eating behavior for women with lower body mass index. Eat Behav. 2013;14(3):336–41. [DOI]
4. Stice E, Marti CN, Shaw H, Jaconis M. An 8–year longitudinal study of the natural history of threshold, subthreshold, and partial eating disorders from a community sample of adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(3):587–97. [DOI]
5. Prentice AM, Jebb SA. Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth? BMJ. 1995;311(7002):437–9. [DOI]
6. Dalen J, Smith BW, Shelley BM, Sloan AL, Leahigh L, Begay D. Pilot study: mindful eating and living (MEAL): weight, eating behavior, and psychological outcomes associated with a mindfulness–based intervention for people with obesity. Complement Ther Med. 2010;18(6):260–4. [DOI]
7. Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Chiu WT, Deitz AC, Hudson JI, Shahly V, et al. The prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73(9):904–14. [DOI]
8. Goldfield GS, Adamo KB, Rutherford J, Legg C. Stress and the relative reinforcing value of food in female binge eaters. Physiol Behav. 2008;93(3):579–87. [DOI]
9. Kalantari F, Davoodi I, Bassaknejad S, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M, Karandish M. The effects of rational–emotive behavior therapy on body mass index, weight self–efficacy, and body image among overweight teenage girls. Psychological Achievements. 2015;22(2):75–98. [Persian] [Article]
10. Ejei J, Hatami M. Predicting procrastination in base of irrational beliefs, frustration discomfort beliefs, self–efficacy, and self–regulation. 2014;8(4):5–6. [Persian]
11. Fathabadi J, Izaddoust M, Taghvaee D, Shallani B, Sadeghi S. Prediction the risk of obesity based on irrational beliefs, health locus of control and health–oriented lifestyle. Journal of Research in Psychological Health. 2017;11(3):1–12. [Persian] [DOI]
12. Osberg TM, Eggert M. Direct and indirect effects of stress on bulimic symptoms and BMI: the mediating role of irrational food beliefs. Eat Behav. 2012;13(1):54–7. [DOI]
13. Feeney J. Attachment and perceived rejection: findings from studies of hurt feelings and the adoption experience. E–Journal of Applied Psychology: Social Section. 2005;1(1):41–9.
14. Basharpoor S, Drodi J, Heidari F. The role of parenting styles and rejection sensitivity in predicting students’ impulsivity. Journal of School Psychology. 2020;8(4):25–40. [Persian] [Article]
15. Downey G, Feldman S, Ayduk O. Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships. 2000;7(1):45–61. [DOI]
16. Zimmer–Gembeck MJ, Pronk RE, Goodwin B, Mastro S, Crick NR. Connected and isolated victims of relational aggression: associations with peer group status and differences between girls and boys. Sex Roles. 2013;68(5):363–77. [DOI]
17. Berenson KR, Gregory WE, Glaser E, Romirowsky A, Rafaeli E, Yang X, et al. Impulsivity, rejection sensitivity, and reactions to stressors in borderline personality disorder. Cognit Ther Res. 2016;40(4):510–21. [DOI]
18. Crow SJ, Stewart Agras W, Halmi K, Mitchell JE, Kraemer HC. Full syndromal versus subthreshold anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder: a multicenter study. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;32(3):309–18. [DOI]
19. Goldin PR, Manber–Ball T, Werner K, Heimberg R, Gross JJ. Neural mechanisms of cognitive reappraisal of negative self–beliefs in social anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(12):1091–9. [DOI]
20. Jafarzadeh Dashbolagh H. The relationship between body image and cognitive distortions with anorexia and bulimia nervosa in patients with depression. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2017;4(2):83–95. [Persian] [Article]
21. Kwon HE, So H, Han SP, Oh W. Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: a rational addiction perspective. Information Systems Research. 2016;27(4):919–39. [DOI]
22. Hamamci Z, Büyüköztürk S. The Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale: development and psychometric characteristics. Psychol Rep. 2004;95(1):291–303. [DOI]
23. Esmaeelpoor K, Bakhshipour Rodsari A, Mohammadzadegan R. Determining the factor structure, validity and reliability of interpersonal cognitive distortions scale among students of Tabriz university. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning. 2015;2(3):69–88. [Persian] [Article]
24. Downey G, Feldman SI. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(6):1327–43. [DOI]
25. Khoshkam S, Bahrami F, Rahmatollahi F, Najarpourian S. Psychometric properties of Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire in university students in Iran. Psychological Research. 2013;17(1):24–44. [Persian]
26. Osberg TM, Poland D, Aguayo G, MacDougall S. The Irrational Food Beliefs Scale: development and validation. Eat Behav. 2008;9(1):25–40. [DOI]
27. Kalantari F. Effectiveness of rational–emotional behavioral therapy on body mass profile, irrational food beliefs, weight self–efficacy, body image and self–acceptance in overweight female adolescents [Ph.D. dissertation in Psychology] [Internet]. [Ahvaz, Iran]: Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University; 2014. [Persian] Available from: [Article]
28. Bentler PM, Yuan KH. Structural equation modeling with small samples: test statistics. Multivariate Behav Res. 1999;34(2):181–97. [DOI]
29. Nauta H, Hospers HJ, Jansen A, Kok G. Cognitions in obese binge eaters and obese non–binge eaters. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2000;24(5):521–31. [DOI]
30. George RL, Cristiani TS. Counseling: theory and practice. 4th ed. Hajiloo M, Falahi R. (Persian translator). Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2010.
31. Alloy LB, Riskind JH. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006.
32. Marston EG, Hare A, Allen JP. Rejection sensitivity in late adolescence: social and emotional sequelae. J Res Adolesc. 2010;20(4):959–82. [DOI]
33. Galliher RV, Bentley CG. Links between rejection sensitivity and adolescent romantic relationship functioning: the mediating role of problem-solving behaviors. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. 2010;19(6):603–23. [DOI]
34. Ayduk O, Zayas V, Downey G, Cole AB, Shoda Y, Mischel W. rejection sensitivity and executive control: joint predictors of borderline personality features. J Res Pers. 2008;42(1):151–68. [DOI]
35. Maor M. Fat women: The role of the mother–daughter relationship revisited. Women’s Studies International Forum. 2012;35(2):97–108. [DOI]
36. Ferraro KF, Holland KB. Physician evaluation of obesity in health surveys: “who are you calling fat?” Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(8):1401–13. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb