Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 41 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safdari A, Parvinpour S, Balali M, Entezari Khorasani Z. The Effect of Manipulation of Task Constraints by Nonlinear Training Method on the Learning of Basic Ball Skills in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. MEJDS 2023; 13 :41-41
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3095-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Movement Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor of Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1024 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The natural development of children follows a predictable pattern. However, there are situations in which problems arise in this process, and the child does not go through the stages of normal growth. Developmental coordination disorder is one of the most important disorders that a significant percentage of children face. Developmental coordination disorder is used to explain problems in the development of motor skills. Many methods and factors can affect and improve the overall development of children with developmental coordination disorder, especially motor development. Today, nonlinear teaching methods have improved children's learning speed by creating variety, manipulation, and noticeable changes in the way of presenting exercises and games. So, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of manipulating task constraints by nonlinear training methods on learning basic ball skills in children with developmental coordination disorder.
Methods: The method of current research was quasi–experimental. The statistical population included 5–to7–year–old girls with growth coordination disorder in Mashhad City, Iran, in 2022. The participants were 30 girls aged 5 to 7 years who were eligible volunteers with developmental coordination disorder, who were purposefully identified through Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ–7) (Wilson et al., 2009) and Movement Assessment Battery for Children–2 (MABC–2) (Henderson et al., 2007) included in the study and randomly divided into two groups of 15 people including; 1) nonlinear training and 2) Linear training (control). To evaluate ball skills in both groups in the pretest and posttest, we used the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD–3) (Ulrich, 2017). The ecological task analysis method was used to manipulate the task constraints and design the training program using the nonlinear training method. In this method, the researcher first determines the main components of the task and the effect on the task's difficulty level; by manipulating and applying noticeable changes, the task's difficulty level was adjusted according to the individual characteristics of children with developmental coordination disorder. Thus, the presented exercises were designed from easy to advanced level so that the training interventions cover all the desired movement skills. According to the group program, the subjects implemented the desired program and interventions for 4 weeks and three sessions of 60 minutes each week. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, mean, and standard deviation and inferential statistics including covariance analysis were used to analyze the data. SPSS version 24 software was used for data analysis. The significance level of the tests was 0.05.
Results: The results show the effect of the training intervention of manipulation of task constraints by nonlinear training method on the variable of ball skills (p<0.001) and the subtests of two–handed hitting the ball (p<0.001), one–handed dribbling (p < 0.001), two–handed catching (p<0.001), kicking the ball (p<0.001), and throwing from below (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in the sub–tests of throwing over the shoulder (p=0.180) and forehand (p=0.241).
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, manipulation of task constraints by nonlinear training method affects learning the basic motor skills of children with developmental coordination disorder. By using this educational approach, instructors can challenge the learner to work harder towards new coordinated patterns and help learners use internal unconscious processes to create the ability to produce functional patterns in people.

Full-Text [PDF 386 kb]   (441 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Payne VG. Human motor development: a lifespan approach. Routledge; 2017. [DOI]
2. Logan SW, Kipling Webster E, Getchell N, Pfeiffer KA, Robinson LE. Relationship between fundamental motor skill competence and physical activity during childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Kinesiology Review. 2015;4(4):416–26. [DOI]
3. Hung W, Pang M. Effects of group-based versus individual-based exercise training on motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(2):122–8. [DOI]
4. Corredor GA, Justicia-Arráez A, Romero-López M, Benavides-Nieto A. longitudinal study of the effects of social competence on behavioral problems. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2017;237:479–85. [DOI]
5. Kordi F, Arsham S, Parvinpour S, Lotfi G. The effect of constraint manipulation (nonlinear method) on the level of intrinsic motivation and skills in girls aged 7 to 9 years. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences 2021;28(9):157–71. [Persian] [Article]
6. Salehi H, Kalantari P. Effects of task constraints on throwing patterns of children. Motor Behavior. 2019;11(36):105–26. [Persian] [Article]
7. Jarrett K, Eloi S, Harvey S. Teaching games for understanding (TGfU) as a positive and versatile approach to teaching adapted games. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity. 2014;7(1):6–20.
8. Tan CWK, Chow JY, Davids K. 'How does TGfU work?': examining the relationship between learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2012;17(4):331–48. [DOI]
9. Ghorbani Marzoni M, Bahram A, Ghadiri F, Yaali R. The comparison of effectiveness linear and nonlinear pedagogy on manipulation motor skills performance of children. Motor Behavior. 2022;13(45):91–112. [Persian] [Article]
10. Sahar F. Impact of nonlinear pedagogy to teaching fundamental movement skills (FMS). 2017.
11. Brown T, Lalor A. The movement assessment battery for children—second edition (MABC-2): a review and critique. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29(1):86–103. [DOI]
12. Pless M, Carlsson M. Effects of motor skill intervention on developmental coordination disorder: a meta-analysis. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2000;17(4):381–401. [DOI]
13. Wilson BN, Crawford SG, Green D, Roberts G, Aylott A, Kaplan BJ. Psychometric properties of the Revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics. 2009;29(2):182–202. [DOI]
14. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children-2. APA PsycTests; 2007. [DOI]
15. Ulrich DA. Introduction to the special section: evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD-3. J Mot Learn Dev. 2017;5(1):1–4. [DOI]
16. Salehi H, Afsorde Bakhshayesh R, Movahedi AR, Ghasemi V. Psychometric properties of a Persian version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire in boys aged 6–11 year–old. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2016;1(4):135–61. [Persian] [Article]
17. Alizadeh B, Ghasemi A, Arabameri E, Rezaey M. Validity and reliability of Movement Assessment Battery for Children–2 Second edition in children whith intellectual disability. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2019;9:38. [Persian] [Article]
18. Salami S, Rahimian Mashhadi M, Shamsipour Dehkordi P. Validity and reliability of the Test of The Development Motor Skills Development of Ulrich in 7–9 years of girls and boy children in Tehran. Motor Behavior. 2019;11(36):127–48. [Persian] [Article]
19. Balali M, Vaez Mousavi MK, Ghasemi A. The role of affordances in developing children manipulative movement skills: an application of challenge point framework. Research in Sport Management. 2019;9(17):15–26. [Persian] [DOI]
20. Richard V, Lebeau JC, Becker F, Boiangin N, Tenenbaum G. Developing cognitive and motor creativity in children through an exercise program using nonlinear pedagogy principles. Creativity Research Journal. 2018;30(40):391–401.
21. Renshaw I, Chow JY, Davids K, Hammond J. A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy. 2010;15(2):117–37. [DOI]
22. Alizadeh L, Mohammad Zadeh H. The role of task constraints manipulation on learning of skills and strategies of basketball by nonlinear pedagogy (TGFU). Motor Behavior. 2020;11(38):115–28. [Persian] [Article]
23. Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Shuttleworth R, Renshaw I, Araújo D. Nonlinear pedagogy: a constraints-led framework for understanding emergence of game play and movement skills. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2006;10(1):71–103.
24. Guadagnoli M, Morin MP, Dubrowski A. The application of the challenge point framework in medical education: application of the challenge point framework. Medical Education. 2012;46(5):447–53. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb