Determining the Effect of Cognitive Dual Task on Postural Control of Children with Flatfoot and Genu Varum

Mosadegh , Younes; Alghosi , Mohammad; Kakavan , Mahdi; Karimi , Kimia

Volume 14 - Articles-1403 MEJDS (2024) 14: 91 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: (SSRI.REC-2211-1939 (R1)).

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mosadegh Y, Alghosi M, Kakavan M, Karimi K. Determining the Effect of Cognitive Dual Task on Postural Control of Children with Flatfoot and Genu Varum. MEJDS 2024; 14 :91-91
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3222-en.html

Determining the Effect of Cognitive Dual Task on Postural Control of Children with Flatfoot and Genu Varum

Younes Mosadegh ^*¹

, Mohammad Alghosi²

, Mahdi Kakavan³

, Kimia Karimi⁴

1- Instructor of Physical Education and Sports Science Department, Technical and Vocational University ‎‎ (TVU), Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Instructor of Physical Education and Sports Science Department, Technical and Vocational University ‎‎ (TVU), Tehran, Iran
3- MSc in Sports Injury and Corrective Exercise, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
4- PhD Student in Sports Injury and Corrective Exercise, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abstract: (885 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Posture control is defined as the ability to maintain the center of mass within the range of the support level, which will keep balance through the integration of information from the visual, vestibular, and sensory systems. This complex movement skill is acquired early in development and is refined throughout childhood. The child adapts to biomechanical constraints and sensorimotor information that facilitates adjustment to different task contexts and develops throughout life. Abnormalities of the lower limb, such as genu varum and genu valgum, affect the position of the center of pressure and balance when performing the one–sided balance task. The body weight is borne by the lower limbs, thereby rendering any deformity within this region capable of influencing postural control. This condition underscores the significance of assessing the impact of lower limb deformities on postural regulation. Also, maintaining balance in people with flat feet and genu varum requires more attention. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cognitive dual–task on postural control of children with flatfoot and genu varum.
‏Methods: The current study employed a quasi–experimental approach utilizing a pretest–posttest design. The statistical population of the research comprised the elementary school students of Bandar Anzali ‎City, Iran. A total of 88 students, aged 7 to 12 years, were recruited using cluster sampling. ‎The names of schools in the six districts of Bandar Anzali city were placed separately in six bags. Then, one school was randomly selected from each district as a sample ‎school to participate in the research. After the initial screening in a targeted manner, three ‎groups of ‎ individuals were selected: flat feet (24 students), genu varum (40 students), and healthy (24 students). In this study, a digital caliper was employed to measure the genu varum of the students by determining the distance between the medial epicondyles of the femur. Individuals were categorized into the genu varum group if the distance between the two medial epicondyles of the thigh exceeded 3 cm. In contrast, those with a distance of less than 3 cm were classified as healthy individuals. To assess flatfoot, the Stahli index was used, which involves dividing the narrowest part of the foot by the width of the heel. To perform the pretest, each participant was placed on the Static Stabilometer for 15 s, and the device recorded the displacement of the center of pressure. Next, after 3 minutes of rest, each participant was placed on the machine to perform the posttest. Random number counting was used to perform the posttest, which had two stages with different levels of difficulty based on the children's ability level. Step one includes counting backward from the number 35 or less to the end of 15 seconds. The second stage consisted of counting backward in the form of two middle numbers from 28 or less until the end of the test time. This study used a Static Stabilometer device (40 x 40 cm) manufactured by Danesh Salar Iranian Company (Tehran, Iran) to measure postural control during cognitive tasks. It measures the sway index in cm (numerical value of the standard deviation from the center balance), the mediolateral displacement of the center of pressure in cm, the anteroposterior displacement of the center of pressure in cm, and the sway speed of the center of pressure in cm/s. We used descriptive statistics to calculate postural control indices' mean and standard deviation. Also, we employed the repeated measures ANOVA test to compare the main effect of the cognitive task with different difficulties on the sway index of the center of pressure, the mediolateral displacement of the center of pressure, and the anteroposterior displacement of the center of pressure. The sway speed of the center of pressure was used in three groups of flatfoot, genu varum, and healthy individuals. The statistical analysis of the data was done using repeated measures analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post hoc test at a significance level 0.05 in SPSS version 28 software.
Results: The effect of the dual cognitive task on anteroposterior sway index (p=0.003), mediolateral sway index (p=0.028), and sway index (p=0.003) were significant, but the cognitive task did not show a significant effect on the sway speed (p=0.353). The results show that the group effect, the interaction effect of the group, and the cognitive task were insignificant in any of the postural control indicators (p>0.05). Also, there was no significant difference between the three groups of flatfoot and genu varum and controls in various indices of height control (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The displacement of the center of pressure displayed a uniform upward trajectory across all three participant groups during simultaneous cognitive task engagement, as opposed to isolated task performance. However, this increase has not significantly changed the three groups. Therefore, postural control in the three groups is not automatic and needs attention.

Keywords: Postural stability, Balance, Dual task, Pronated foot, Bow leg

Full-Text [PDF 316 kb] (315 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References

1. Bonke EM, Southard J, Buckley TA, Reinsberger C, Koerte IK, Howell DR. The effects of repetitive head impacts on postural control: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(3):247–57. [DOI]

2. Jo D, Bilodeau M. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: scoping review of quantitative evidence. Gait Posture. 2021;90:167–78. [DOI]

3. Kiefer AW, Armitano-Lago CN, Cone BL, Bonnette S, Rhea CK, Cummins-Sebree S, et al. Postural control development from late childhood through young adulthood. Gait Posture. 2021;86:169–73. [DOI]

4. Van Gheluwe B, Kirby KA, Hagman F. Effects of simulated genu valgum and genu varum on ground reaction forces and subtalar joint function during gait. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95(6):531–41. [DOI]

5. Letafatkar A, Mantashloo Z, Moradi M. Comparison the time to stabilization and activity of the lower extremity muscles during jump-landing in subjects with and without genu varum. Gait Posture. 2018;65:256–61. [DOI]

6. Samaei A, Bakhtiary A, Elham F, Rezasoltani A. Effects of genu varum deformity on postural stability. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(06):469–73. [DOI]

7. Nyland J, Smith S, Beickman K, Armsey T, Caborn DNM. Frontal plane knee angle affects dynamic postural control strategy during unilateral stance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(7):1150–7. [DOI]

8. Tsai LC, Yu B, Mercer VS, Gross MT. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):942–53. [DOI]

9. Hedayati R, Fatemi E, Hajihasani A, Ehsani F, Ramezanpour S. The attention needed for balance controlling in young patients with flatfoot. Koomesh. 2016;18(1):25–34. [Persian] [Article]

10. Evans AM. The paediatric flat foot and general anthropometry in 140 Australian school children aged 7–10 years. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011;4(1):12. [DOI]

11. Napolitano C, Walsh S, Mahoney L, McCrea J. Risk factors that may adversely modify the natural history of the pediatric pronated foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2000;17(3):397–417.

12. Sonia J, Nadia L, Manel A, Samia F, Mohamed BR, Walid O, et al. Children flat foot and lower limb rotational profile: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Open J Orthop. 2015;5(10):326–35. [DOI]

13. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41–6.

14. Liparoti M. Effects of motor and cognitive loads on postural stability in healthy children. In: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2021 - Winter Conferences of Sports Science [Internet]. Universidad de Alicante; 2021. [DOI]

15. Dai B, Cook RF, Meyer EA, Sciascia Y, Hinshaw TJ, Wang C, et al. The effect of a secondary cognitive task on landing mechanics and jump performance. Sports Biomech. 2018;17(2):192–205. [DOI]

16. Yang YR, Chen YC, Lee CS, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. Dual-task-related gait changes in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture. 2007;25(2):185–90. [DOI]

17. Tomas-Carus P, Biehl-Printes C, Pereira C, Veiga G, Costa A, Collado-Mateo D. Dual task performance and history of falls in community-dwelling older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2019;120:35–9. [DOI]

18. Helal OF, El Fiky AAR. Early adult detection is a good protector from balance disturbance in elderly. J Phys Ther Health Promot. 2015;3(4):47–51. [DOI]

19. Ghorbanlou F, Jafarnezhadgero A, Fakhri Mirzanag E. The effect of training with elastic band on electro myography of lower limb muscles in genu valgum male students during running: a clinical trial study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2022;21(3):327–42. [Persian] [DOI]

20. Hernandez AJ, Kimura LK, Laraya MHF, Fávaro E. Calculation of staheli's plantar arch index and prevalence of flat feet: a study with 100 children aged 5-9 years. Acta Ortop Bras. 2007;15(2):68–71. [DOI]

21. Heydari M, Mousavi Sadati SK, Daneshjoo A. Short-term effects of using arch supporting insoles on balance and symptoms of flexible flat foot in children. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022;1244–57. [Persian] [DOI]

22. Kirmizi M, Yalcinkaya G, Sengul YS, Kalemci O, Angin S. Investigation of balance performance under different sensory and dual-task conditions in patients with chronic neck pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021;56:102449. [DOI]

23. Moghadam M, Ashayeri H, Salavati M, Sarafzadeh J, Taghipoor KD, Saeedi A, et al. Reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability in healthy older adults: Effects of postural task difficulty and cognitive load. Gait Posture. 2011;33(4):651–5. [DOI]

24. Gursoy ZG, Yilmaz U, Celik H, Arpinar-Avsar P, Kirazci S. Effect of individualized cognitive and postural task difficulty levels on postural control during dual task condition. Gait Posture. 2022;96:1–8. [DOI]

25. Allahverdipour H, Dianat I, Mameh G, Asghari Jafarabadi M. Effects of cognitive and physical loads on dynamic and static balance performance of healthy older adults under single-, dual-, and multi-task conditions. Hum Factors. 2021;63(7):1133–40. [DOI]

26. Panahi M, Babakhani F, Seidi F. Comparison of static and dynamic balance of physically active college women with different foot arch heights. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2016;12(2):88–96. [Persian] [Article]

27. Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. 2011;2(1):21–33.

28. Greve JMD, Cuğ M, Dülgeroğlu D, Brech GC, Alonso AC. Relationship between anthropometric factors, gender, and balance under unstable conditions in young adults. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–5. [DOI]

29. Pena GM, Pavão SL, Oliveira MFP, Godoi D, De Campos AC, Rocha NACF. Dual‐task effects on postural sway during sit‐to‐stand movement in children with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019;63(6):576–86. [DOI]

30. Pettersson AF, Olsson E, Wahlund LO. Effect of divided attention on gait in subjects with and without cognitive impairment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2007;20(1):58–62. [DOI]

31. Horvat M, Croce R, Fallaize A. Information processing and motor control in Down syndrome. J Down Syndr Chr Abnorm. 2016;2(1):1–5. [DOI]

32. Plummer P, Eskes G, Wallace S, Giuffrida C, Fraas M, Campbell G, et al. Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(12):2565–74. [DOI]

33. Chow VWK, Ellmers TJ, Young WR, Mak TCT, Wong TWL. Revisiting the relationship between internal focus and balance control in young and older adults. Front Neurol. 2019;9:1131. [DOI]

34. Amboni M, Barone P, Hausdorff JM. Cognitive contributions to gait and falls: evidence and implications. Movement Disorders. 2013;28(11):1520–33. [DOI]

35. Yogev‐Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Movement Disorders. 2008;23(3):329–42. [DOI]

36. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16(1):1–14. [DOI]

37. Ruthruff E, Pashler HE, Klaassen A. Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8(1):73–80. [DOI]