Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 31 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Javadi A, Manzari Tavakoli A R, Manzari Tavakoli H, Zeinaddini Meimand Z. Predicting Academic Resilience Based on Self-compassion and Positive Self-talk Among Secondary School Students. MEJDS 2024; 14 :31-31
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3266-en.html
1- PhD Student, Psychology and Educational Sciences Group, Faculty of Literature and Human Studies, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Psychology and Educational Sciences Group, Faculty of Literature and Human Studies, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
Abstract:   (798 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Academic resilience is one of the main structures for understanding motivation, excitement, and academic behavior. Academic resilience helps students adapt and regain their previous academic performance in the event of academic failure. Various factors can affect academic resilience, including self–compassion and positive self–talk. Self–compassion emphasizes the fundamental principle that external soothing thoughts, views, and behaviors must be internalized. In this situation, the mind relaxes in internal situations and reacts to external conditions. Positive self–talk is done to correct the interpretation of events related to oneself and others. In this situation, it has common goals with compassion–based therapy and has an effective role in resilience. Students who have low academic resilience learn to be compassionate and have positive self–talk by expressing beneficial positive statements, being kind to themselves, and improving their self–esteem.
Methods: The research method was correlational analysis. The statistical population includes all 8200 secondary school students in the city of Kerman, Iran, in the academic year 2022–2023, of which 384 students were selected as a sample based on Krejcie & Morgan's table (1970) using stratified random sampling based on the gender of the students. The inclusion criteria for the subjects were as follows: students of the second secondary school, studying in Kerman City, interest in cooperation in research, and no physical and mental diseases (according to the information in the student's academic records). The exclusion criterion was non–cooperation in the research. The data collection tools were the Self–Compassion Scale (Neff, 2003), the Self–Talk Scale (Brinthaupt et al., 2009), and the Conner–Davidson Resilience Scale (Conner & Davidson, 2003). Data analysis was done using SPSS version 25 software with the Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression tests considering a significance level 0.05.
Results: The results showed that self–compassion (p<0.001, β=0.466) and positive self–talk (p<0.001, β=0.335) were predictors of academic resilience (R2adj=0.467). In addition, self–kindness (p<0.001, β=0.252), isolation (p=0.044, β=0.105), mindfulness (p=0.008, β=0.144), and extreme identification (p<0.001, β=0.248) were predictors of academic resilience (R2adj=0.397). Also, social assessment (p=0.027, β=0.146), self–enhancement (p=0.005, β=0.184), and self–criticism (p<0.001, β=0.273) predict students' academic resilience (R2adj=0.30).
Conclusion: The present study determined that self–compassion and positive self–talk influence students' academic resilience. Through their self–compassion and positive self–talk, the students' level of academic resilience can be expected to improve.

Full-Text [PDF 561 kb]   (326 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Hunsu NJ, Oje AV, Tanner-Smith EE, Adesope O. Relationships between risk factors, protective factors and achievement outcomes in academic resilience research: a meta–analytic review. Educational Research Review. 2023;41:100548. [DOI]
2. Lees C, Keane P, Porritt B, Cleary JP. Exploring nursing students' understanding and experiences of academic resilience. A qualitative study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2023;18(2):276–80. [DOI]
3. Ucan E, Avci D. Turkish adaptation of the nursing student Academic Resilience Inventory: a validity and reliability study. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;126:105810. [DOI]
4. Kim SJ, Lee J, Song JH, Lee Y. The reciprocal relationship between academic resilience and emotional engagement of students and the effects of participating in the Educational Welfare Priority Support Project in Korea: autoregressive cross–lagged modeling. International Journal of Educational Research. 2021;109:101802. [DOI]
5. Supervía UP, Bordás SC, Robres QA. The mediating role of self–efficacy in the relationship between resilience and academic performance in adolescence. Learning and Motivation. 2022;78:101814. [DOI]
6. Grande RAN, Berdida DJE, Santos KCP, Pangket P, Cabansag DI. Structural equation modeling of the relationship between nursing students' quality of life and academic resilience. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022;17(4):667–77. [DOI]
7. Khodabandehlou S, Zivari Rahman M. Providing a new approach for segmenting customers based on their purchasing behavior change over time in electronic business. Journal of Information Technology Management. 2017;9(2):277–300. [DOI]
8. Tremblay MI, Bennett EV, Mosewich AD, Norman ME, Crocker PRE. "I think the best athletes use it": masculinities and self–compassion among men varsity athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023;69:102486. [DOI]
9. Gilbert P. Compassion focused therapy: a special section. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2010;3(2):95–6. [DOI]
10. Khodabandehlou S, Niknafs AA. Proposing a new method for customer segmentation based on their level of loyalty and defining appropriate strategies for each segment. Journal of Information Technology Management. 2016;8(1):101–22. [Persian] [DOI]
11. Curry OS, Rowland LA, Van Lissa CJ, Zlotowitz S, McAlaney J, Whitehouse H. Happy to help? a systematic review and meta–analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well–being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018;76(1):320–9. [DOI]
12. Turk F, Kellett S, Waller G. Testing a low–intensity single–session self–compassion intervention for state body shame in adult women: a dismantling randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther. 2023;54(5):916–28. [DOI]
13. Cabaços C, Macedo A, Carneiro M, Brito MJ, Amaral AP, Araújo A, et al. The mediating role of self-compassion and repetitive negative thinking in the relationship between perfectionism and burnout in health–field students: a prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences. 2023;213:112314. [DOI]
14. Wu X, Gai X, Wang W. Subjective well–being and academic performance among middle schoolers: a two–wave longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence. 2020;84:11–22. [DOI]
15. Zivari–Rahman M, Ghanbari S, Shokouhi–Moghadam S. Psychometric properties of the Youth Pornography Addiction Screening Tool. Addict Health. 2021;13(4):207–20. [DOI]
16. Barbeau K, Carbonneau N, Pelletier L. Family members and peers' negative and positive body talk: how they relate to adolescent girls' body talk and eating disorder attitudes. Body Image. 2022;40:213–24. [DOI]
17. Hase A, Hood J, Moore LJ, Freeman P. The influence of self–talk on challenge and threat states and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2019;45:101550. [DOI]
18. Nedergaard J, Christensen MS, Wallentin M. Valence, form, and content of self–talk predict sport type and level of performance. Consciousness and Cognition. 2021;89:103102. [DOI]
19. Khodabandehlou S, Niknafs A. Improving customer loyalty evaluation methods in the grocery retail industry: a data mining approach. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management. 2016;10:158–178. [DOI]
20. Lepadatu I. Use self–talking for learning progress. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;33:283–7. [DOI]
21. Carter S, Littlewood K, Cooper L, Spadola C, Rosenthal M, Bennett RL, et al. Time for me: development and results of an RCT of a kinship navigator self–compassion and care toolkit for caregivers by caregivers. Children and Youth Services Review. 2023;152:107076. [DOI]
22. Kuchar AL, Neff KD, Mosewich AD. Resilience and Enhancement in Sport, Exercise, & Training (RESET): a brief self–compassion intervention with NCAA student–athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2023;67:102426. [DOI]
23. Bicaker E, Schell SE, Racine SE. The role of self–compassion in the relationship between rejection and unhealthy eating: an ecological momentary assessment study. Appetite. 2023;186:106568. [DOI]
24. Bukhari SAR. Sample size determination using Krejcie and Morgan table. Kenya: Kenya Projects Organization;2021, pp:607–10. [DOI]
25. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self–compassion. Self and Identity. 2003;2:223–50. [DOI]
26. Khosravi S, Sadeghi M, Yabande M. Psychometric properties of Self–Compassion Scale (SCS). Psychological Models and Methods. 2013;4(13):47–59. [Persian] [Article]
27. Brinthaupt TM, Hein MB, Kramer TE. The Self–Talk Scale: development, factor analysis, and validation. J Pers Assess. 2009;91(1):82–92. [DOI]
28. Alavi K, Amirpour L, Modarres Gharavi M. The relationship between self–talk style and emotional difficulties in students. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2013;15(58):118–26. [Persian] [DOI]
29. Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD–RISC). Depression and Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82. [DOI]
30. Soltaninejad M, Asiabi M, Ahmdi B, Tavanaiee Yosefian S. A study of the psychometric properties of the Academic Resilience Inventory (ARI). Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2014;4(15):17–35. [Persian] [Article]
31. Alibabaei M, Vahhabi Homabadi J, Khaleghipour S. The effectiveness of eclective method of kindness and positive self–talk on resiliency, hostility and positive feeling towards spouse in betrayed women. Positive Psychology Research. 2019;5(2):47–64. [Persian] [DOI]
32. Denis K, Beker R. The effect of self compassion on the irrational beliefs, self dissociation and marital not satisfaction in couples. J Pers Assess. 2015;63(2):262–74.
33. Hayes N, Joseph S. Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well–being. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;34(4):723–7. [DOI]
34. Mostafaei A, Mohammadi A. Investigating the effect of positive self–talking on self–efficacy in elementary male students. Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2016;3(12):71–7. [Persian] [Article]
35. Bernat FP. Youth resilience: can schools enhance youth factors for hope, optimism, and success? Women & Criminal Justice. 2009;19(3):251–66. [DOI]
36. Baniassadi T, Javanmard Z, Zivari–Rahman M, Shokouhi–Moqhaddam S, Adhami M. Investigating the relationship between personality traits and self–control and nicotine dependence symptoms in male prisoners in Kerman, Iran. Addiction & Health. 2015 Winter-Spring;7(1–2):82–6.
37. Zivari Rahman M, Salehi K, Khodaie E, Moghadamzadeh A, Hakimzadeh R. Pathology of scholastic aptitude search in Iran (systematic review of literature in the last three decades). Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2022;12(39):103–40. [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb