Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 156 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tavallaie M A, Khosh Akhlagh H, Foruzandeh E. Comparing the Effectiveness of Teaching Methods Based on Cooperative Learning, Concept Mapping and Traditional Methods on Academic Motivation. MEJDS 2024; 14 :156-156
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3442-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Naein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Naein, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Naein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Naein, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Naein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Naein, Iran
Abstract:   (195 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Elementary school is one of the most essential educational settings, which is mainly considered the basis and foundation of education in the later stages of life, where a person learns the skills of reading, writing, and mathematics. In addition to strengthening educational skills, students in this course of study face problems in various fields, among which we can mention weakness in learning mathematics and lack of interest in mathematics. We are witnessing the weakness of elementary school students in mathematics and the problems that exist in the academic motivation of students of this level. On the other hand, the positive consequences are created by improving mathematics and academic motivation in students. Thus, it is necessary to use an educational program to help these people. Based on this, this research aims to compare the effectiveness of teaching methods based on cooperative learning, concept mapping, and traditional methods on the academic motivation of sixth–grade students.
Methods: The current research method was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population of the research was comprised of sixth–grade students from Khomeini Shahr City, Iran. Due to the limitations of the study in terms of administrative issues, the long duration of the research, the large number of interventions, the satisfaction and cooperation of the teachers, the satisfaction of the parents of the students, and the limitations of the required facilities, equipment and spaces, 81 students were selected from the mentioned community. Three classes of 29, 27, and 26 students were selected as available samples for research. One class was taught cooperative learning, the other class was taught concept map, and the third class received the traditional method. The Academic Motivation Scale (Harter, 1981) was used to collect data. The data were analyzed using a multivariate analysis of covariance and a Bonferroni post hoc test with a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS software version 24.
Results: The average academic motivation scores of the students in the control and experimental groups based on concept mapping and cooperative learning were 98.11, 96.12, and 97.17. The average academic motivation scores of the students in the posttest stages in the control and experimental groups based on concept mapping and cooperative learning experimental groups were 97.19, 104.04, and 106.90. The average academic motivation scores in the subjects of the two experimental groups were higher than the control group in the posttest phase compared to the pretest. The results of the present study showed that cooperative learning significantly improved students' academic motivation (p<0.001). On the other hand, concept mapping significantly enhanced students' academic motivation (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between these two educational methods in changing students' academic motivation (p=0.452).
Conclusion: The results showed that the teaching method based on cooperative learning and concept maps, compared to the traditional method, significantly affects the academic motivation of mathematics. From the research findings, it can be concluded that teachers can use cooperative learning methods and concept maps to improve the academic motivation of sixth–grade students. Also, teachers can use one of the concept map or collaborative learning methods in their class to increase academic motivation according to their class's taste and conditions.

Full-Text [PDF 286 kb]   (98 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Aningsih, Zulela M, Neolaka A, Iasha V, Setiawan B. How is the education character implemented? the case study in indonesian elementary school. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2022;12(1):371. [DOI]
2. Ramesh E. A study on concept, importance and problems of elementary education with reference to India. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education. 2022;8(1):1915–21.
3. Bevan D, Capraro MM. Posing creative problems: a study of elementary students' mathematics understanding. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2021;16(3):em0654. [DOI]
4. Yeni EM, Herman WT. Difficulty analysis of elementary school students in mathematical problem solving in solutions. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2020;9(3):1–4.
5. Wulandari RD, Lukito A, Khabibah S. The elementary school students' mathematical problem solving based on reading abilities. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;947:012050. [DOI]
6. Kenedi AK, Sari IK, Ahmad S, Ningsih Y, Zainil M. Mathematical connection ability of elementary school student in number materials. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2019;1321(2):022130. [DOI]
7. Okigbo EC, Onoshakpokaiye EO. Relationship between academic motivation and academic performance of secondary school students in mathematics. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling. 2023;6(1):10–16. [DOI]
8. Raj Acharya B. Factors affecting difficulties in learning mathematics by mathematics learners. International Journal of Elementary Education. 2017;6(2):8. [DOI]
9. Hossein-Mohand H, Hossein-Mohand H. Influence of motivation on the perception of mathematics by secondary school students. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1111600. [DOI]
10. Gordeeva TO, Sychev OA, Pshenichnuk DV, Sidneva AN. Academic motivation of elementary school children in two educational approaches — innovative and traditional. Psychol Russ. 2018;11(4):19–36. [DOI]
11. Dwi Kurino Y, Cahyaningsih U. The effect of realistic mathematic education towards student' learning motivation in elementary school. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1477(4):042043. [DOI]
12. Roy B, Sarkar B. Motivation towards mathematics in relation to academic performance of 10th grade students. Int J Res Rev. 2023;10(1):277–83. [DOI]
13. Salimi Akbarabadi M, Zarifsanaiey N, Raeisi Shahraki H. Enhancing the students' academic motivation and learning achievement through the flipped classroom approach: an educational intervention. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2023;14(3):216–24. [DOI]
14. Berestova A, Kolosov S, Tsvetkova M, Grib E. Academic motivation as a predictor of the development of critical thinking in students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2022;14(3):1041–54. [DOI]
15. Yuner B. Investigation of the relationship between academic self-efficacy, academic motivation and success: the case of prospective teachers. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;49(2):706–23. [DOI]
16. Kayan Fadlelmula F. Enablers and obstacles in teaching and learning of mathematics: a systematic review in LUMAT journal. LUMAT. 2022;10(2):33–55. [DOI]
17. Kaymak S, Kassymbek Zh, Kalamkas A, Saydenov F. The effect of cooperative learning on students academic achievement. Management Studies. 2021;9(6):495–503. [DOI]
18. Chen R. A review of cooperative learning in EFL classroom. Asian Pendidikan. 2021;1(1):1–9. [DOI]
19. Zach S, Shoval E, Shulruf B. Cooperative learning in physical education lessons - literature review. Front Educ. 2023;8:1273423. [DOI]
20. Wang M, Alavi M, Izadpanah S. The impact of jigsaw cooperative learning on academic motivation, academic hardiness, and self-efficacy of English Foreign Language learners. Learning and Motivation. 2023;84:101940. [DOI]
21. Loes CN. The effect of collaborative learning on academic motivation. Teaching and Learning Inquiry. 2022;10. [DOI]
22. Rafiei Taba Zavareh SE, Bagheri N, Sabet M. Effectiveness of cooperative learning on math anxiety, academic motivation and academic buoyancy in high school students. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology. 2022;4(3):410–21. [DOI]
23. Utami AD, Yuliyanto E. Concept map: does it increase learning motivation of student? Journal of Science Education Research. 2020;4(2):49–54. [DOI]
24. Baliga S, Walvekar P, Mahantshetti G. Concept map as a teaching and learning tool for medical students. J Edu Health Promot. 2021;10(1):35. [DOI]
25. Hafiz M, Kadir, Fatra M. Concept mapping learning strategy to enhance students' mathematical connection ability. In: MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (MSCEIS 2016): Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education [Internet]. Bandung, Indonesia; 2017. [DOI]
26. Chinofunga MD, Chigeza P, Taylor S. Concept maps as a resource to enhance teaching and learning of mathematics at senior secondary level. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 2023;31(1):30–41. [DOI]
27. Mosavi Shafigh MS, Khoshneshin Z, Mahdavi Nasab Y, Mojadam M. The effect of teacher and student-based concept mapping on the motivation and learning of eighth grade high school students. Technology of Education Journal. 2023;17(2):279–92. [Persian] [Article]
28. Varoglu L, Yilmaz A, Şen Ş. The impact of the 5e learning model improved with concept maps on motivation. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. 2024;14(3):189–211. [DOI]
29. Harter S. A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Dev Psychol. 1981;17(3):300–12. [DOI]
30. Lepper MR, Corpus JH, Iyengar SS. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97(2):184–96. [DOI]
31. Bahrani M. The study of validity and reliability of Harter's scale of educational motivation Journal of Psychological Studies. 2009;5(1):51–75 [Persian] [Article]
32. Hajihoseinlou K, Khaleghkhah A, Zahedbabolan A, Moenikia M. The effect of cooperative learning with achievement groups on self-efficacy and self-concept of student's mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2017;13(43):119–39. [Persian] [Article]
33. Kalhor M, Mehran G. The effect of concept mapping strategy on critical thinking skills in students. Educational Psychology. 2017;13(44):153–72. [Persian] [Article]
34. Lei Z, Ismail L, Razali F, Ghazali N. A literature review on cooperative learning to improve EFL students' learning motivation. Intern Journal of Profess Bus Review. 2023;8(6):e02636. [DOI]
35. Viñuela Y, De Caso Fuertes AM. Improving motivation in pre-school education through the use of project-based learning and cooperative learning. Front Educ. 2023;7:1094004. [DOI]
36. Kardan Halvaee Z, Hatami J, Fathi Azar A. Effect of concept map on the academic achievement of the high school students in physics. New Educational Approaches. 2016;11(1):41–62. [Persian] [Article]
37. Almulla MA, Alamri MM. Using conceptual mapping for learning to affect students' motivation and academic achievement. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):4029. [DOI]
38. Pestana SCC, Peixoto F, Rosado Pinto P. Academic achievement and intrinsic motivation in higher education students: an analysis of the impact of using concept maps. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2023;15(3):663–80. [DOI]
39. Ashoori J, Kajbaf MB, Manshaee G, Talebi H. Effectiveness of conceptual map, cooperative learning and traditional teaching methods on the incentive to progress and academic achievement in biology course. Research in Curriculum Planning. 2014;11(41):63–73. [Persian]
40. Fernández-Ferrer M, Espinoza Pizarro D. A flipped classroom experience in the context of a pandemic: cooperative learning as a strategy for meaningful student learning. J Technol Sci Educ. 2022;12(3):644. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb