Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 153 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: ۱۱۷۴۸۶۳۰۹۸۰۰۴۵۰۱۳۹۹۱۶۲۲۷۲۷۸۶
Ethics code: IR.IAU.RASHT.REC.1402.051

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tavakoli Azad J, Akbari B, Moghtader L, Shakerinia I. Determining the Mediating Role of Self-control in the Relationship Between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Psychological Well-Being in Men Afflicted with Substance Abuse. MEJDS 2024; 14 :153-153
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3501-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (351 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Substance abuse has undoubtedly affected many individuals and families in the country, and this is not an issue that can be ignored or considered unimportant. Studies have shown that good emotion regulation protects people from experiencing a wide range of adversities and mental health problems. Emotion regulation is an important variable in increasing or decreasing psychological well–being in people. It also seems that the relationship between difficulty in emotion regulation and psychological well–being sometimes occurs due to the mediating role of self–control. On the other hand, emotion regulation, well–being, and self–control are important variables related to people with substance abuse, and studies have shown a decrease in these variables in these people. Therefore, research on variables related to addiction and substance abuse is one of the obligations of every country and contributes to the individual and social development of that country. The present study aimed to determine the mediating role of self–control in the relationship between difficulty in emotion regulation and psychological well–being in men with substance abuse.
Methods: This research method was correlational based on structural equation modeling. The research population included all the men with substance abuse who were referred to addiction treatment centers in Rasht City, Iran, for treatment of their addiction within three months (May to July 2024). A total of 264 qualified volunteers of this population were included in the study by the purposive sampling method according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria included participants' satisfaction, age range between 24 and 40 years, male only, recently detoxified (maximum one month), and education level of at least reading and writing ability. The exclusion criteria included failure to complete the questionnaire, severe physical and mental disorders such as psychosis, bipolar disorder, or borderline personality disorder (self–report), and excessive use of antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs (benzodiazepines). The instruments used in this research were the Psychological Well–Being Scale (Ryff & Keyes, 1995), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Gratz & Roemer., 2004), and the Brief Self–Control Scale (Tangney et al., 2004). The Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation method were performed in SPSS version 26 and AMOS version 24 at a significance level of 0.05 to analyze the data.
Results: In the fitted model, the direct effect of the difficulty in emotion regulation with psychological well–being (b= –0.37, p<0.001) was negative and significant; the direct effect of the self–control with psychological well–being (b=0.16, p=0.024) was positive and significant. Also, the direct effect of difficulty in emotion regulation with self–control (b= –0.50, p<0.001) was negative and significant. Further, the indirect effects of self–control in the relationship between difficulty in emotion regulation and psychological well–being (b= –0.08, p<0.05) were negative and significant. The collected data showed that the model has a good fit (RMSEA=0.04, χ2/df=1.49, CFI=0.96, GFI=0.97, IFI= 0.98, AGFI=0.95, TLI= 0.95).
Conclusions: According to the results, the mediating role of self–control in the relationship between difficulty in emotion regulation and psychological well–being in men with substance abuse was confirmed. Therefore, the results of this study may be a promising finding to improve the conditions of people with substance abuse so that practical steps can be taken to reduce and prevent the anomalies and injuries of the future generation of society.

Full-Text [PDF 418 kb]   (119 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Haryadi R, Handayani ES, Hayati SA. Psychological well-being of ex-drug addicted counselee in post-rehabilitation education. J Psikol Pendidik. 2020;6(1):1. [DOI]
2. McNair R, Monaghan M, Montgomery P. Heroin assisted treatment for key health outcomes in people with chronic heroin addictions: a context-focused systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023;247:109869. [DOI]
3. Özer D, Şahin Altun Ö, Kayaoğlu K, Tanrıkulu AB. Evaluation of metacognition, difficulties in emotion regulation and addiction severity levels of individuals diagnosed with substance use disorder. J Subst Use. 2024;1–7. [DOI]
4. Aboutalebi H, Yazdchi N, Smkhani Akbarinejhad H. Effectiveness of cognitive emotion regulation training on psychological well-being & cognitive emotion regulation of addicted men in Isfahan city. Journal of Community Health. 2022;16(1):23–33. [Persian] [Article]
5. Bozarth MA. Drug addiction as a psychobiological process. In: Warburton DM; editor. Addiction controversies. CRC Press; 2023.
6. Nikolinakou A, Phua J, Kwon ES. What drives addiction on social media sites? The relationships between psychological well-being states, social media addiction, brand addiction and impulse buying on social media. Comput Human Behav. 2024;153:108086. [DOI]
7. Zhi R, Derakhshan A. Modelling the interplay between resilience, emotion regulation and psychological well‐being among Chinese English language teachers: the mediating role of self‐efficacy beliefs. Eur J Educ. 2024;59(3):e12643. [DOI]
8. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069–81. [DOI]
9. Dagenais-Desmarais V, Savoie A. What is psychological well-being, really? a grassroots approach from the organizational sciences. J Happiness Stud. 2012;13:659–84. [DOI]
10. Davis KC, Neilson EC, Kirwan M, Eldridge N, George WH, Stappenbeck CA. Alcohol-involved sexual aggression: Emotion regulation as a mechanism of behavior change. Health Psychol. 2021;40(12):940–50. [DOI]
11. Miller AE, Racine SE. Emotion regulation difficulties as common and unique predictors of impulsive behaviors in university students. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(5):1387–95. [DOI]
12. González-Roz A, Castaño Y, Krotter A, Salazar-Cedillo A, Gervilla E. Emotional dysregulation in relation to substance use and behavioral addictions: Findings from five separate meta-analyses. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024;24(3):100502. [DOI]
13. Chukwuemeka NA, Obioha CW. Emotion regulation strategies on psychological distress and psychological well-being of caregivers of mentally challenged children: moderating role of social support. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2024;29(1):79–91. [DOI]
14. Abedin T, Taghiloo S, Ghodsi P, Davabi M. Causal relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and psychological well-being with regard to the mediating role of mindfulness in students. Early Childhood Health And Education. 2024;4(4):87–101. [Persian] [Article]
15. Kouchi T, Ahmadi V, Mami S, Nademi A. Investigating the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological well-being of university students in Ilam city, Iran through positive and negative affect. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2022;12:189. [Persian] [Article]
16. Farhadi I, Barati F. Determining the effectiveness of emotion regulation training on psychological well-being, school adjustment, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxious children. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2022;12:139. [Persian] [Article]
17. Seyedkhorasani MS, Rafiei-Honar H, Mirzahosseini H. Mediation model of self-control in predicting adolescent psychological well-being based on attachment style and religious orientation. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023;30(4):160–9. [Persian] [Article]
18. Abedini M, Akbari B, Sadeghi A, Asadi Majareh S. The effect of self-control on emotional well-being with the mediating role of self-compassion and emotion regulation in cancer patients. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2023;24(3):135–46. [Persian] [DOI]
19. Şimşir Gökalp Z. Examining the relationships between helicopter parenting, self-control, self-efficacy, and multi-screen addiction among Turkish emerging adults. J Genet Psychol. 2023;184(4):229–42. [DOI]
20. Rahbar Kenarsari Z, Ranjbar Noushari F, Baradaran M. The mediating role of self-control in the relationship between traumatic childhood experiences and craving in patients with methadone maintenance treatment. Etiadpajohi. 2024;17(70):31–54. [DOI]
21. Wenzel M, Bürgler S, Rowland Z, Hennecke M. Self-control dynamics in daily life: the importance of variability between self-regulatory strategies and strategy differentiation. Eur J Pers. 2023;37(1):33–56. [DOI]
22. Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Twenge JM, Nelson NM, Tice DM. Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(5):883–98. [DOI]
23. Błachnio A, Przepiorka A. Dysfunction of self-regulation and self-control in facebook addiction. Psychiatr Q. 2016;87(3):493–500. [DOI]
24. Kline RB. The mediation myth. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2015;37(4):202–13. [DOI]
25. Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):719–27. [DOI]
26. Bayani AA, Koochekya AM, Bayani A. Reliability and validity of ryff's psychological well-being scales. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology. 2008;14(2):146-51. [Persian] [Article]
27. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54. [DOI]
28. Besharat MA. Emotion regulation difficulty scale. Thoughts & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2018;12(47):89–92. [Persian] [Article]
29. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004;72(2):271–324. [DOI]
30. Mousavimoghadam SR, Houri S, Omidi A, Zahirikhah N. Evaluation of relationship between intellectual intelligence and self-control, and defense mechanisms in the third year of secondary school girls. Medical Sciences. 2015;25(1):59–64. [Persian] [Article]
31. Breton MD, Devore MD, Brown DE. A tool for systematically comparing the power of tests for normality. J Stat Comput Simul. 2008;78(7):623–38. [DOI]
32. McNeish D, Wolf MG. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychol Methods. 2023;28(1):61–88. [DOI]
33. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(2):348–62. [DOI]
34. Seligman MEP, Rashid T, Parks AC. Positive psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2006;61(8):774–88. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb