Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 32 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidari L, Rezaeisharif A, Nakhostin Goldoost A. The Effectiveness of Emotional Process Regulation Training on Academic Self-Regulation of Students with Specific Learning Disorders. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :32-32
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3539-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
2- Professor, Department of counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract:   (163 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Specific learning disorder is one of the most common neurodevelopmental conditions in childhood, significantly impacting the lives of many children worldwide. Consequently, numerous studies have investigated its etiology and treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that low academic self-regulation is a prominent issue associated with learning disabilities. A variety of therapeutic and educational strategies have been explored to alleviate the symptoms and challenges faced by students with specific learning disorders. Many of these children struggle with emotional regulation, particularly in managing anxiety, and show reduced ability to identify, accept, and express their emotions. Therefore, emphasizing emotional regulation as part of self-regulation training in their education may be beneficial. One emotion-focused intervention is the instruction of emotion regulation processes, and research into the effectiveness of this approach in various domains has been promising. However, it is evident that this program has not yet been applied to academic self-regulation in students with specific learning disorders. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of emotional process regulation training on academic self-regulation in students with specific learning disorders.
Methods: This research adopted a semi-experimental design, featuring a pre-test–post-test structure with both an experimental group and a control group. The statistical population included female elementary school students with learning disabilities in Khalkhal city during the 2023–2024academic year. Thirty eligible participants were selected through convenience sampling and, after meeting the inclusion criteria, were assigned to two groups of 15 students each. The instruments used in the study were the Learning Problems Questionnaire by Colorado Wilcott et al. (2011) and the Academic Self-Regulation Scale by Bouffard et al. (1995). The process regulation training program developed by Gross (2015) was administered to the experimental group in 10 sessions of 90 minutes each. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27 at both descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential levels (univariate analysis of covariance).
Results: The results indicated that emotional process regulation training had a significant effect on improving academic self-regulation in the experimental group after controlling for the pre-test scores (p<0.001). Specifically, 30.6% of the variance in academic self-regulation during the post-test phase was attributed to the emotional process regulation training.
Conclusion: Overall, the findings of this study demonstrated that teaching emotion regulation processes was effective in enhancing academic self-regulation among students with specific learning disorders. These results hold important implications for psychology, as emotion regulation training is both low-cost for patients and requires minimal instruction for practitioners and specialists. Accordingly, it is recommended that researchers and professionals consider incorporating this educational program as a complementary intervention alongside other treatments aimed at improving academic self-regulation in students with learning disabilities. Despite these promising outcomes, the present study also faced certain limitations. The use of self-report measures, the exclusive inclusion of female students with specific learning disorders in Khalkhal city due to limited access, and the absence of a follow-up period due to time constraints suggest that the generalizability of the findings should be approached with caution. Future studies are encouraged to include larger and more diverse samples of both male and female students, as well as follow-up assessments, to yield more comprehensive and generalizable results.

Full-Text [PDF 292 kb]   (24 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Saravanan V, Castelino AM, Meethan S. Challenges in Disability Certification in Specific Learning Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorders in an Indian Context. InHandbook of Research on Child and Adolescent Psychology Practices and Interventions 2024;pp:487-504. [DOI]
2. Moradi MR, Kiany M. The Effectiveness of neuropsychological practical exercises on improvingexecutive functions and attention Spanin students with dyslexia. Neuropsychology. 2021 Feb 19;6(23):43-58. [Persian] [DOI]
3. HardmanMM, Drew CJ, Egan MW. (Human exceptionality: society, school, and family). Alizadeh H, Ganji K, Yosefi M, Yadegari F (Persian Translators). 7th ed. Tehran: Danzheh Pub; 2019.
4. Theofilidis A, Sofologi M, Bonti E, Kougioumtzis G, Kamari A. Different Theoretical Perspectives on Specific Learning Difficulties in Mathematics. Implications for Special Educational Intervention and for Everyday School Practice”: An overview study. 2020 Feb [cited 2025 Jul 13]; Available from: [Article]
5. Margolis AE. Defining specific learning disorder: the evolution of the diagnostic criteria. Learning Disorders Across the Lifespan: A Mental Health Framework. 2023 Jan 18:9-15. [DOI]
6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [DOI]
7. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5, 5th. ed, 2013. Rezaei F, Fakhraei A, Farmand A. (Persian translators). Tehran: Arjomand Pub; 2021.
8. Alipour F, Nejati V, Dehrouye S, Mardad Aliyan F, Badaghi E. Cognitive emotion regulation and behavioral problems in 7-12 years old children with specific learning (disorders reading, writing and mathematics deficits). Journal of Exceptional Children. 2020 Jan 1;20(1):87-98. [Persian] [Article]
9. Cristofani P, Di Lieto MC, Casalini C, Pecini C, Baroncini M, Pessina O, et al. Specific Learning Disabilities and Emotional-Behavioral Difficulties: Phenotypes and Role of the Cognitive Profile. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023 Jan;12(5):1882. [DOI]
10. Cole PG, Chan KS. Methods and Strategies for Special Education. Prentice Hall; 1990. 386 p.
11. Caprara GV, Fida R, Vecchione M, Del Bove G, Vecchio GM, Barbaranelli C, et al. Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2008;100(3):525–34. [DOI]
12. Capozzi F, Casini MP, Romani M, De Gennaro L, Nicolais G, Solano L. Psychiatric Comorbidity in Learning Disorder: Analysis of Family Variables. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008 Mar 1;39(1):101–10. [DOI]
13. Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001 Feb 1;52(Volume 52, 2001):1–26. [DOI]
14. Won S, Hensley LC, Wolters CA. Brief Research Report: Sense of Belonging and Academic Help-Seeking as Self-Regulated Learning. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2021 Jan 2;89(1):112–24. [DOI]
15. Alvi E, Gillies RM. Self-regulated learning (SRL) perspectives and strategies of Australian primary school students: a qualitative exploration at different year levels. Educational Review. 2023 Jun 7;75(4):680–702. [DOI]
16. Rezaeisharif A, Sobhi-gharamaleki N, Pourabdol S, Zarghamhajebi M, Beyki M. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Improving Academic Self-regulation and Psychological Flexibility in Students with Specific Learning Disorder(SLD). Journal of Psychological Studies. 2021 Nov 22;17(3):115–36. [Persian] [DOI]
17. Graham S, Harris KR. Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In: Handbook of learning disabilities. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2003. p. 323–44. [Article]
18. Pressley M, Harris KR. Cognitive Strategies Instruction: From Basic Research to Classroom Instruction. Journal of Education. 2009 Jan 1;189(1–2):77–94. [DOI]
19. Lawson MJ, Vosniadou S, Van Deur P, Wyra M, Jeffries D. Teachers’ and Students’ Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar 1;31(1):223–51. [DOI]
20. Harris B, Kulkarni T, Sullivan AL. Review of State Policies and Guidance for the Identification of Culturally and Linguistically Minoritized Students With Specific Learning Disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2024 Jan 1;57(1):3–15. [DOI]
21. Keshavarz Valian N, Zarei Goniani A. Effectiveness of child-oriented mindfulness training on alexithymia and emotion regulation of children with Specific Learning Disorder. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2020 Dec 21;11(4):63–77. [DOI]
22. Auerbach JG, Gross-Tsur V, Manor O, Shalev RS. Emotional and Behavioral Characteristics Over a Six-Year Period in Youths With Persistent and Nonpersistent Dyscalculia. J Learn Disabil. 2008 May 1;41(3):263–73. [DOI]
23. Gross JJ. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015.
24. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85(2):348–62. [DOI]
25. Sheppes G, Suri G, Gross JJ. Emotion Regulation and Psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2015 Mar 28;11(Volume 11, 2015):379–405. [DOI]
26. Garnefski N, Koopman H, Kraaij V, ten Cate R. Brief report: Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological adjustment in adolescents with a chronic disease. Journal of Adolescence. 2009;32(2):449–54. [DOI]
27. IranNejad S. The Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Training based on Gross Model on Academic Performance and Problem Solving in Female High School Students. Journal of Psychology New Ideas. 2021 May 10;8(12):1–8. [Article]
28. Hasani J, Shahmoradifar T. Effectiveness of Process Emotion Regulation Strategy Training in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation. Journal of Military Medicine. 2022 Oct 26;18(1):339–46. [Persian] [Article]
29. Soltani M, Ghazanfari A. The Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Training on Ademic Adjustment, Academic Motivation and Self-Perception of Students with Learning Disabilities in Shahrekord. Journal of Psychology New Ideas. 2024 May 10;20(24):1–15. [Persian] [Article]
30. Veisiy N, Arjmandnia AA, Vakili S, Gholamali Lavasani M. The effect of training emotional self-regulation strategies on social competence, academic performance and behavioral problems of students with learning disabilities with comorbidity of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Psychological Science. 2022;21(116):1613-29. [Persian] [DOI]
31. Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Valiente C. Emotion-Related Self-Regulation, and Children’s Social, Psychological, and Academic Functioning. In: Child Psychology. 3rd ed. Psychology Press; 2016. [DOI]
32. Gross JJ, Feldman Barrett L. Emotion Generation and Emotion Regulation: One or Two Depends on Your Point of View. Emotion Review. 2011 Jan 1;3(1):8–16. [DOI]
33. Willcutt EG, Boada R, Riddle MW, Chhabildas N, DeFries JC, Pennington BF. Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire: Validation of a parent-report screening measure. Psychological Assessment. 2011;23(3):778–91. [DOI]
34. Hajloo N, Rezaie Sharif A. Psychometric properties of colorado learning difficulties questionnaire (CLDQ). Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2012 Jan 1;1(1):24–43. [Persian] [Article]
35. Bouffard T, Boisvert J, Vezeau C, Larouche C. The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1995;65(3):317–29. [DOI]
36. Kadivar P. Investigating the contribution of self-efficacy, self-management, and intelligence beliefs in students' academic progress in order to develop a model for optimal learning. [Tehran]: Education Research Institute;2001. [Persian]
37. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2010 Mar 1;30(2):217–37. [DOI]
38. Narimani M. Comparison of negative mood and emotional expression in students with and without specific learning disorder. Journal of Research in Educational Systems. 2016 Feb 20;9(31):69–90. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb