Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 7 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yousefi N, Pirkhaefi A, Borjali A. Determining the Effectiveness of Positive Psychology Interventions on Positive Symptoms of Psychology and Psychopathological Symptoms in Farhangian University Students. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :7-7
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2918-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
2- Associate Professor of Psychology Department, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
3- Full Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1213 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The mental health system was primarily focused on treating mental health disorders and eliminating the symptoms of psychopathology. In the abbreviated version of the disease symptoms checklist, three common symptoms of psychopathology, namely somatization, depression, and anxiety, are emphasized. However, it has been acknowledged that focusing only on eliminating pathological symptoms alone cannot bring mental health to a person. Still, besides reducing pathological symptoms, positive psychological symptoms should also increase. Positive psychological symptoms provide well–being and good living for a person, including emotional well–being, psychological well–being, and social well–being. Therefore, when people show few pathological symptoms and high positive psychological symptoms, they experience complete mental health. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions on positive psychological symptoms and pathological–psychological symptoms in Farhangian University students.
Methods: This research method was interventional and quasi–experimental, with a pretest–posttest design and a control group with a one–month follow–up. The statistical population included all students of Farhangian University in Tehran City, Iran, in the academic year of 2021–2022. Among them, 30 eligible volunteers were selected and randomly assigned to an experimental group (positive psychology interventions) and a control group (15 people in each group). The inclusion criteria for entering the research included being a student teacher, filling out an agreement and ethical consent form to join the research, and not having a stressful event such as the death of a loved one in the last 6 months. The exclusion criteria included failure to complete the ethical agreement and consent form, absence of more than two meetings, and non–cooperation in completing the research tools in the pretest and posttest. First, four experts checked and confirmed the content validity of the educational package of positive psychology interventions (3 people with a doctorate in clinical psychology and one with a doctorate in psychometrics). Only the experimental group received nine training sessions of positive psychology interventions. Both the experimental group and the control group responded to two study instruments before and after the training and in the one–month follow–up period: the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (Keyes et al., 2008) and the Brief Symptom Inventory–18 (Derogatis & Fitzpatrick, 2004). Data analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test at a significance level 0.05 using SPSS software version 24.
Results: The analysis of variance with recurrent measurements showed that the time and group effects on emotional well–being variables, social well–being, psychological well–being, positive psychological resources, somatization, depression, anxiety, and psychological pathology symptoms were statistically significant (p<0.05). Bonferroni test results showed that in the experimental group, between the mean scores of emotional well–being variables, social well–being, psychological well–being, positive psychological resources, somatization, depression, anxiety, and psychological pathology symptoms in the pretest and posttest became (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the average variables in the posttest and follow–up. Also, there was no significant difference between the average variables in the posttest and follow–up, indicating the durability of the effectiveness of the intervention at the follow–up stage (p>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the research findings, teaching positive psychology interventions increases the positive symptoms of psychology and decreases the psychopathological symptoms of Farhangian University students.

Full-Text [PDF 307 kb]   (101 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Kotera Y, Ting SH. Positive psychology of malaysian university students: impacts of engagement, motivation, self–compassion, and well–being on mental health. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2021;19(1):227–39. [DOI]
2. Kim DH, Michalopoulos LM, Voisin DR. Validation of the brief symptom inventory–18 among low–income African American adolescents exposed to community violence. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(1–2):NP984–1002. [DOI]
3. Derogatis LR, Fitzpatrick M. The SCL–90–R, the brief symptom inventory (BSI), and the BSI–18. In: The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults, Volume 3. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004. pp: 1–41.
4. Martínez P, Andreu Y, Conchado A. Psychometric properties of the spanish version of the cancer survivors' unmet needs (CaSUN-S) measure in breast cancer. Psicothema. 2021;33(1):155–63. [DOI]
5. Mitchell J, Vella-Brodrick D, Klein B. Positive psychology and the internet: a mental health opportunity. E–Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;6(2):30–41. [DOI]
6. World Health Organization. Changing history: the world health report 2004. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
7. Keyes CLM, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, Temane M, Kruger A, van Rooy S. Evaluation of the mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) in setswana–speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008;15(3):181–92. [DOI]
8. Diener E. Assessing well–being. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. [DOI]
9. Ryff CD. Eudaimonic well–being, inequality, and health: recent findings and future directions. Int Rev Econ. 2017;64(2):159–78. [DOI]
10. Reinhardt M, Horváth Z, Morgan A, Kökönyei G. Well–being profiles in adolescence: psychometric properties and latent profile analysis of the mental health continuum model – a methodological study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):95. [DOI]
11. Keyes CLM, Yao J, Hybels CF, Milstein G, Proeschold-Bell RJ. Are changes in positive mental health associated with increased likelihood of depression over a two year period? A test of the mental health promotion and protection hypotheses. J Affect Disord. 2020;270:136–42. [DOI]
12. Martínez–Martí ML, Ruch W. Character strengths and well–being across the life span: data from a representative sample of German–speaking adults living in Switzerland. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1253. [DOI]
13. Schueller SM, Kashdan TB, Parks AC. Synthesizing positive psychological interventions: suggestions for conducting and interpreting meta–analyses. Intnl J Wellbeing. 2014;4(1):91–8. [DOI]
14. Brown L, Ospina JP, Celano CM, Huffman JC. The effects of positive psychological interventions on medical patients' anxiety: a meta–analysis. Psychosom Med. 2019;81(7):595–602. [DOI]
15. Hendriks T, Warren MA, Schotanus-Dijkstra M, Hassankhan A, Graafsma T, Bohlmeijer E, et al. How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well–being. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2019;14(4):489–501. [DOI]
16. Westerhof GJ, Keyes CLM. Mental illness and mental health: the two continua model across the lifespan. J Adult Dev. 2010;17(2):110–9. [DOI]
17. Lamers SMA, Westerhof GJ, Glas CAW, Bohlmeijer ET. The bidirectional relation between positive mental health and psychopathology in a longitudinal representative panel study. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2015;10(6):553–60. [DOI]
18. Wood AM, Joseph S. The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well–being as a risk factor for depression: a ten year cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2010;122(3):213–7. [DOI]
19. Moskowitz JT, Cheung EO, Freedman M, Fernando C, Zhang MW, Huffman JC, et al. Measuring positive emotion outcomes in positive psychology interventions: a literature review. Emotion Review. 2021;13(1):60–73. [DOI]
20. Carr A, Cullen K, Keeney C, Canning C, Mooney O, Chinseallaigh E, et al. Effectiveness of positive psychology interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2021;16(6):749–69. [DOI]
21. Firth J, Torous J, Nicholas J, Carney R, Rosenbaum S, Sarris J. Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? a meta–analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:15–22. [DOI]
22. Mousavifard ZS. The effectiveness of positive thinking skills on the anxiety of children with epilepsy in Bandar Abbas city. In: 6th National Conference on Positive Psychology [Internet]. Hormozgan, Iran: Civilica; 2019. [Persian] [Article]
23. Lamers SMA. Positive mental health : measurement, relevance and implications [Internet] [Ph.D. dissertation]. [Enschede, The Netherlands]: University of Twente; 2012. Available from: [Article]
24. Yousefi N, Pirkhaefi A, Borjali A. Investigating the psychometric of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form Scale. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2020;18(2):129–44. [Persian] [DOI]
25. Petrowski K, Schmalbach B, Jagla M, Franke GH, Brähler E. Norm values and psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory–18 regarding individuals between the ages of 60 and 95. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):164. [DOI]
26. Akhavan Abiri F, Shairi MR. Short forms of Symptom Checklist (SCL): investigation of validity & reliability. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2020;18(1):137–62. [Persian] [DOI]
27. Rashid T, Baddar MKAH. Positive psychotherapy: clinical and cross–cultural applications of positive psychology. In: Positive psychology in the Middle East/North Africa: research, policy, and practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019. pp: 333–62. [DOI]
28. Seligman MEP. Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In: Handbook of positive psychology. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2002. pp: 3–9.
29. Frisch MB. Evidence–based well–being/positive psychology assessment and intervention with quality of life therapy and coaching and the qualityof life inventory (QOLI). Soc Indic Res. 2013;114(2):193–227. [DOI]
30. Parks AC, Della Porta MD, Pierce RS, Zilca R, Lyubomirsky S. Pursuing happiness in everyday life: the characteristics and behaviors of online happiness seekers. Emotion. 2012;12(6):1222–34. [DOI]
31. Wong PTP. Positive psychology 2.0: towards a balanced interactive model of the good life. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne. 2011;52(2):69–81. [DOI]
32. Fredrickson BL. The eudaimonics of positive emotions. In: Handbook of eudaimonic well–being. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature; 2016. pp: 183–90.
33. Schwartz S. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2012;2(1). [DOI]
34. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(2):145–61. [DOI]
35. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
36. Pirkhaefi A. Thesis on creativity therapy. Tehran: Ketabemehraban Pub; 2013. [Persian]
37. Chakhssi F, Kraiss JT, Sommers–Spijkerman M, Bohlmeijer ET. The effect of positive psychology interventions on well–being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta–analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):211.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb