Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 110 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.ABHRR.REC.1403.002

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahmani F, Alijani F, Babakhani V, Poyamanesh J. Comparing the Effectiveness of Paradoxical Couple Therapy and Schema Therapy on Couples' Marital Disaffection and Marital Happiness. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :110-110
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3644-en.html
1- PhD Student in Counseling, Department of Counseling, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
2- Department of Counseling, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
3- Department of Psychology, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
Abstract:   (532 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Marital relationships are crucial for mental health and family stability, providing emotional support and enhancing life satisfaction. Successful marriages reduce stress and increase happiness, but unresolved conflicts, poor communication, and unmet emotional needs can lead to marital disaffection—marked by emotional detachment and indifference—and reduced happiness. Marital disaffection is the gradual decline of emotional attachment between couples, leading to emotional alienation and feelings of disinterest and indifference towards each other. Marital happiness refers to the feeling of satisfaction, happiness, and comfort in the marital relationship. Marital satisfaction is a very important factor, contributing to the relationship between couples. Paradoxical couple therapy (PTC), rooted in behavioral techniques, uses paradoxes to reduce resistance and promote change. Schema therapy, based on Young’s model, integrates cognitive–behavioral and experiential methods to modify maladaptive schemas, fostering secure attachments. Prior studies show that PTC reduces conflicts and schema therapy alleviates burnout and improves satisfaction, but direct comparisons are lacking. So, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of paradoxical couple therapy and schema therapy on marital disaffection and marital happiness in couples.
Methods: The present research was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a 1–month follow–up design, with a control group. The statistical population comprised all couples seeking counseling at the Naroon Center in Tehran City, Iran, during 2024. Twenty–one volunteer couples meeting inclusion criteria (married at least one year, having at least one child, literate, aged 20–40, no concurrent psychotherapy or psychiatric medication, no substance abuse, scoring below 45 on marital happiness and above 50 on marital disaffection) were selected via convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two experimental groups (paradoxical couple therapy or schema therapy) and one control group (7 couples each). The exclusion criteria included unwillingness to participate, excessive absences, incomplete assignments, or concurrent external events. Observing scientific honesty and integrity, obtaining informed consent from research subjects, respecting the anonymity of the scales and the participants' right to remain anonymous, keeping their information confidential, and creating a reassuring atmosphere were among the ethical considerations that the researcher took into account. Data were gathered using Marital Disaffection Scale (Kayser, 1993) and Marital Happiness Scale (Azrin et al., 1973). The interventions were the Paradoxical therapy followed Besharat's protocol (2018) over 7 sessions, focusing on social interviews, behavioral analysis, paradox prescription (eg, exaggerating conflicts on timetables), and self–therapy planning. Schema therapy adhered to Young's model (2003) over 8 sessions, covering rapport building, schema education, cognitive strategies (validity testing, dialogues), experiential techniques (imagery, letter writing), and behavioral pattern–breaking (role–playing, motivation enhancement). Ethical considerations included informed consent, confidentiality, anonymity, and IRB approval (IR.IAU.ABHRR.REC.1403.002). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics (means, SDs) and inferential tests (repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post–hoc), at a significance level of p<0.05 using SPSS–25.
Results: Results showed that the effects of time (p<0.001), group (p<0.001), and the interaction of time and group (p<0.001) on the variables of marital disaffection and marital happiness were significant. Paradoxical couple therapy and schema therapy had a significant effect on reducing marital disaffection and increasing marital happiness of couples (p<0.001). Also, no significant difference was observed between the two paradoxical couple therapy and schema therapy in affecting on variables of marital disaffection and marital happiness (p>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the findings, both paradoxical couple therapy and schema therapy effectively reduce marital disaffection and enhance happiness without superiority between them. Therapists should integrate these for couple interventions, potentially improving family outcomes.

Full-Text [PDF 411 kb]   (111 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References
1. Sanctuary G. Marriage under stress: a comparative study of marriage conciliation. Routledge; 2023. [DOI]
2. Pincus L. Marriage: studies in emotional conflict and growth. Taylor & Francis; 2023. [DOI]
3. Kane JB. Marriage advantages in perinatal health: evidence of marriage selection or marriage protection? J Marriage Fam. 2016;78(1):212–29. [DOI]
4. Tao HL. Marriage and happiness: evidence from Taiwan. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(6):1843–61. [DOI]
5. Parkinson L. Conciliation in separation and divorce: finding common ground. London: Routledge; 2023.
6. Ameri S, Marashian FS. Effectiveness of emotion-focused therapy on marital disaffection and psychological distress in women traumatized by their husbands’ betrayal. Women’s Health Bulletin. 2023;10(3):182–90. [Persian] [DOI]
7. Karasu F, Ayar D, Çopur EÖ. The effect of solution focused level on marital disaffection and sexual satisfaction in married individuals. Contemp Fam Ther. 2023;45(1):75–84. [DOI]
8. Lawrence EM, Rogers RG, Zajacova A, Wadsworth T. Marital happiness, marital status, health, and longevity. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(5):1539–61. [DOI]
9. Kasapoğlu F, Yabanigül A. Marital satisfaction and life satisfaction: the mediating effect of spirituality. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling. 2018;3(2):177–95. [DOI]
10. Nazari AM, Taheri Rad M, Asadi M. The effectiveness of enhancement program on marital adjustment. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;3(4):527–43. [Persian] [Article]
11. Arsita DS, Soetjiningsih CH. Trust and marital happiness of wife is in a long distance marriage. Scientific Journal of Guidance and Counseling. 2021;12(3). [DOI]
12. Bélanger C, Laporte L, Sabourin S, Wright J. The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happiness and problem solving self-appraisal. Am J Fam Ther. 2015;43(2):103–18. [DOI]
13. Nurhayati SR, Faturochman F, Helmi AF. Marital quality: a conceptual review. Buletin Psikologi. 2019;27(2):109. [DOI]
14. Besharat MA. Evaluating the effectiveness of paradoxical couple therapy for the treatment of couple problems: a case study. Iranian Journal of Family Psychology. 2020;7(1):1–18. [Persian] [Article]
15. Carr A. Couple therapy and systemic interventions for adult‐focused problems: the evidence base. J Fam Ther. 2025;47(1):e12481. [DOI]
16. Besharat M. Paradox + timetable = treatment complete model of couple therapy using the ptc method practical guide. Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2018. [Persian]
17. Chitgarzadeh MJ, Asayesh MH, Besharat MA, Hakkak F. Investigating the effectiveness of paradoxical couple therapy (PTC) on marital conflicts and emotion regulation in conflicting couples. Rooyesh. 2023;12(2):39–50. [Persian] [Article]
18. Mohammadpour M, Aslami E. Evaluating the effectiveness of paradox therapy on components of psychological well-bing of conflicting couples. 2022;14(18):1–24. [Persian] [Article]
19. Kopf-Beck J, Müller CL, Tamm J, Fietz J, Rek N, Just L, et al. Effectiveness of schema therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy versus supportive therapy for depression in inpatient and day clinic settings: a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2024;93(1):24–35. [DOI]
20. Van Dijk SDM, Veenstra MS, Van Den Brink RHS, Van Alphen SPJ, Oude Voshaar RC. A systematic review of the heterogeneity of schema therapy. J Pers Disord. 2023;37(2):233–62. [DOI]
21. Atkinson T, Perris P. Schema Therapy for couples: Interventions to promote secure connections. In: Heath G, Startup H; editors. Creative methods in schema therapy advances and innovation in clinical practice. Routledge; 2020.
22. Zhang K, Hu X, Ma L, Xie Q, Wang Z, Fan C, et al. The efficacy of schema therapy for personality disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nord J Psychiatry. 2023;77(7):641–50. [DOI]
23. Pilkington PD, Noonan C, May T, Younan R, Holt RA. Early maladaptive schemas and intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021;28(5):1030–42. [DOI]
24. Asgari A, Goodarzi K. The effectiveness of emotional schema therapy on marital burnout on the brink of divorce. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2018;8:55. [Persian] [Article]
25. Kamalian T, Mirzahoseini H, Monirpoor N. Comparison of the effectiveness of emotional schema therapy with self-differentiation method on marital burnout in women. Applied Psychology. 2020;14(1):9–33. [Persian] [Article]
26. Nadafi N. The effectiveness of schema therapy on emotional divorce of couples. Studies in Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2019;43(4):107–16. [Persian]
27. Mohannaei S, Golestaneh SM, Pouladi Reishahri A, Keykhosravani M. The effectiveness of couple therapy using Young's schema therapy method on marital adjustment and emotional divorce in couples seeking divorce in Bushehr city. Social Psychology. 2019;13(51):109–18. [Persian] [Article]
28. Zeinali N, Maddahi ME. The effectiveness of therapeutic schemas on attachment style and marital satisfaction on married women. Studies in Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2019;4(1):21–35. [Persian]
29. Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WAJG. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(12):1234–8. [DOI]
30. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Routledge; 2013.
31. Kayser K. When love dies: the process of marital disaffection. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.
32. Kohi S, Etemadi O, Fatehizadeh M. The relationship between personality characteristics, general health, contextual factors, and marital dissatisfaction of couples. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;4(1):71–84. [Persian] [Article]
33. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979;9(1):139–45. [DOI]
34. Sayed AliTabar SH, Mohammad Alipour Z, Habibi F, Sarvestani A, Javanbakht A. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Marital Disillusionment Scale. Pajoohande. 2016;20(6):342–9. [Persian] [Article]
35. Azrin NH, Naster BJ, Jones R. Marital Happiness Scale. APA PsycTests; 2013. [DOI]
36. Emami Kalesar L, Rasouli M. The relationship between relational beliefs, relational attributes and marital happiness. Applied Psychology. 2018;11(4):393-410. [Persian] [Article]
37. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: a practitioner's guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.
38. Taghiyar Z, Pahlavanzadeh F, Samavi SA. The effectiveness of schema therapy on marital frustration in married women. Journal of Women and Family Studies. 2016;9(34):49–63. [Persian]
39. Panahandeh M. Schema therapy for couples (effective relationships in marital life). Tehran: Nasle Roshan Pub; 2023. [Persian]
40. Simeone-DiFrancesco C, Roediger E, Stevens BA. Schema therapy for couples. Mohammadkhani Sh. (Persian translator). Tehran: Ebn-e-Sina Pub; 2024. [Persian]
41. Ahmadzadehaghdam E, Karimisani P, Goudarzi M, Moradi O. The effectiveness of couple therapy with schema therapy approach on disaffection and marital commitment in couples. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2020;8(5):1–13. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb