Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 29 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

SaminSamin B, Farahani E, Khatibi G. Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Internal Shame and Social Anxiety in Mothers with Physically Disabled Children. MEJDS 2023; 13 :29-29
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1532-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
Abstract:   (3299 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Research evidence suggests that mothers of physically disabled children suffer more from social and psychological problems and are less likely to benefit from proper health and well–being. An issue more frequently encountered by the mothers of physically–disabled children is the feelings of embarrassment and shame compared to their counterparts with healthy children. In addition, they experience high anxiety levels. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a non–medical treatment method for reducing stress and psychotherapy. Instead of changing cognition, this treatment attempts to increase the psychological relationship of individuals with their thoughts and feelings. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of ACT on the social anxiety and internal shame of mothers with physically–disabled children.
Methods: This study was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design and a control group. The study's statistical population comprised all mothers with physically–disabled children living in Tehran City, Iran, in 2018. Of them, 36 mothers were selected by convenience sampling technique and randomly assigned into the experimental and control groups (each group with 18 persons). The research method followed the necessary coordination with the authorities of the clinic and the Welfare Organization of Tehran City, Iran. The inclusion criteria were as follows: having a physically–disabled child, willingness to participate in therapeutic intervention sessions, and having at least a diploma. The exclusion criteria included having more than one disabled child and taking pills related to mental illnesses. The data collection instruments were Internalized Shame Scale (Cook, 1993) and Social Anxiety Scale (Conner et al., 2000). ACT was performed in 8 sessions of 90 minutes in the experimental group. However, no intervention was applied to the control group. Immediately after the completion of the experimental intervention, the intervention was provided to the control group. Finally, an analysis of covariance was performed to assess the presented therapy's effectiveness in SPSS version 23. The data analysis was conducted at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The mean±SD internal shame score of the experimental group was 49.23±9.74, which decreased to 38.77±8.54 at the posttest. Furthermore, the mean±SD value of social anxiety decreased from 42.90±9.56 at the pretest to 31.12±8.75 at the posttest. Moreover, ANCOVA data revealed that after eliminating the effect of the pretest, the mean scores of the posttest of internal shame (p<0.001) and social anxiety (p<0.001) between the two groups were statistically significant.
Conclusion: According to the findings, ACT can be used for mothers of children with physical disability and effectively reduces mothers' internal shame and social anxiety.

Full-Text [PDF 488 kb]   (331 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Feros DL, Lane L, Ciarrochi J, Blackledge JT. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for improving the lives of cancer patients: a preliminary study. Psychooncology. 2013;22(2):459–64. [DOI]
2. Newsome S, Waldo M, Gruszka C. Mindfulness group work: preventing stress and increasing self-compassion among helping professionals in training. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 2012;37(4):297–311. [DOI]
3. Fish JA, Ettridge K, Sharplin GR, Hancock B, Knott VE. Mindfulness-based cancer stress management: impact of a mindfulness-based programme on psychological distress and quality of life. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014;23(3):413–21. [DOI]
4. Benson PR. The impact of child and family stressors on the self-rated health of mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: associations with depressed mood over a 12-year period. Autism. 2018;22(4):489–501. [DOI]
5. Matos M, Pinto-Gouveia J, Gilbert P, Duarte C, Figueiredo C. The Other As Shamer Scale – 2: Development and validation of a short version of a measure of external shame. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015;74:6–11. [DOI]
6. Bayer V, Robert-McComb JJ, Clopton JR, Reich DA. Investigating the influence of shame, depression, and distress tolerance on the relationship between internalized homophobia and binge eating in lesbian and bisexual women. Eat Behav. 2017;24:39–44. [DOI]
7. Lewis M. The role of the self in shame. Social Research: An International Quarterly. 2003;70(4):1181–204.
8. Alkozei A, Cooper PJ, Creswell C. Emotional reasoning and anxiety sensitivity: associations with social anxiety disorder in childhood. J Affect Disord. 2014;152–154:219–28. [DOI]
9. Davis TE, Nida RE, Zlomke KR, Nebel-Schwalm MS. Health-related quality of life in college undergraduates with learning disabilities: the mediational roles of anxiety and sadness. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2008;31(3):228. [DOI]
10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
11. Knijnik DZ, Blanco C, Salum GA, Moraes CU, Mombach C, Almeida E, et al. A pilot study of clonazepam versus psychodynamic group therapy plus clonazepam in the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2008;23(8):567–74. [DOI]
12. Hughes LS, Clark J, Colclough JA, Dale E, McMillan D. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(6):552–68. [DOI]
13. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy. 2004;35(4):639–65.
14. Howell AJ, Passmore H-A. Acceptance and commitment training (ACT) as a positive psychological intervention: a systematic review and initial meta-analysis regarding ACT's role in well-being promotion among university students. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(6):1995–2010. [DOI]
15. Pots WTM, Fledderus M, Meulenbeek PAM, ten Klooster PM, Schreurs KMG, Bohlmeijer ET. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a web-based intervention for depressive symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208(1):69–77. [DOI]
16. Oliver JE, McLachlan K, Jose PE, Peters E. Predicting changes in delusional ideation: the role of mindfulness and negative schemas. Psychol Psychother. 2012;85(3):243–59. [DOI]
17. Pourfaraj Omran M. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment group therapy in social phobia of students. Journal of Knowledge & Health. 2012;6(2):1–5. [Persian] [Article]
18. Ossman WA, Wilson KG, Storaasli RD, McNeill JW. A preliminary investigation of the use of acceptance and commitment therapy in group treatment for social phobia. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy. 2006;6(3):397–416.
19. Swain J, Hancock K, Hainsworth C, Bowman J. Mechanisms of change: exploratory outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for anxious adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2015;4(1):56–67. [DOI]
20. Cook DR. The inremalized shame scale manual. Menomonie. WI: Channel Press; 1993.
21. Connor KM, Davidson JR, Churchill LE, Sherwood A, Foa E, Weisler RH. Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). New self-rating scale. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:379–86. [DOI]
22. Rajabi G, Abasi G. An investigation of relationship between self-criticism, social interaction anxiety, and fear of failure with Internalized shame in students. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling. 2012;1(2):171–82. [Persian]
23. Jadidi M, Safary S, Jadidi M, Jamali S. Comparing social support and social anxiety between mothers of children with special needs and mothers of normal children. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2017;16(2):43–52. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb