Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback in Improving Attention and Response Control in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Asadi Saravi, Mahsan; Shirazi, Mahmoud; Baniassadi, Hasan

doi:10.29252/mejds.0.0.105

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 35 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/mejds.0.0.105

‎ 20.1001.1.23222840.1399.0.0.108.7

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Asadi Saravi M, Shirazi M, Baniassadi H. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback in Improving Attention and Response Control in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. MEJDS 2022; 12 :35-35
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1667-en.html

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback in Improving Attention and Response Control in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Mahsan Asadi Saravi¹

, Mahmoud Shirazi ^*²

, Hasan Baniassadi³

1- Department of Psychology, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Shahid Bahonar

Abstract: (3259 Views)

Background & Objectives: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders that begins from infancy and continues until adulthood. It affects various aspects of a person's life, including personal life, social interactions, professional life, executive performances, concentration, etc. One of the relatively new viewpoints on ADHD disorder is to notice the neurological factors. In this viewpoint, the nervous system is an important and key factor in the incidence and progression of this disorder. One of the relatively new methods of treatment of this disorder which has designated several clinical confirmation trials is neurofeedback-based therapies. Neurofeedback is a conditioning procedure by which patients can modify the electrical activity of their brains. The goal of neurofeedback training is to correct abnormal EEGs, which results in improved behavioral and cognitive function in the individual. Neurofeedback therapy is a promising treatment based on normalizing the abnormal patterns of brain waves in children with ADHD. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neurofeedback training in improving attention and response control of children with ADHD.
Methods: The method of the present study is quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population includes all 7-14 years old students referred to Kerman’s Peyvand consultation center, Kerman City, Iran, in 2016-2017. They were diagnosed with ADHD. The sample included 60 students, selected by a convenience sampling method and randomly assigned to control (n=30) and experimental groups (n=30). The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of ADHD, aged between 7 and 14 years, consent and formal approval of students' parents to participate in research, no comorbidity disorder with ADHD, IQ greater than 70 and no visual or auditory impairment. The exclusion criteria for the experimental group were the absence of more than five sessions from the intervention and the unwillingness to continue the treatment. In the pretest and posttest for two groups, the Computational version of Sandford and Turner's Integrated Visual and Auditory Test (1995) was run. Neurofeedback treatment sessions for experimental group were performed in 40-45-min sessions three days per week. No intervention was presented for the control group. Data analysis was performed at descriptive (frequency, average, standard deviation) and inferential levels (multivariate analysis of covariance) in SPSS software, version 16. The significance level of the tests was considered 0.05.
Results: The results indicate that after the omission of the pretest effects on dependent variables and regarding the F factor obtained in the scale of auditory attention (p=0.001), visual attention (p=0.001), auditory response control (p=0.001) and visual response control (p=0.001) there was a statistically significant difference between the adjusted averages of the participants scores in two stages of pretest and posttest. Based on Eta coefficients, a greater rate of effect and difference were observed in the visual attention (equal to 51%).
Conclusions: According to the findings of this study, neurofeedback is an effective tool that can increase attention (visual and auditory) and response control (visual and auditory) of children with ADHD.

Keywords: Neurofeedback, Attention, Response control, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Full-Text [PDF 591 kb] (595 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References

1. Polanczyk GV, Willcutt EG, Salum GA, Kieling C, Rohde LA. ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):434–42. [DOI]

2. Taanila A, Ebeling H, Tiihala M, Kaakinen M, Moilanen I, Hurtig T, et al. Association between childhood specific learning difficulties and school performance in adolescents with and without ADHD symptoms: a 16-year follow-up. J Atten Disord. 2014;18(1):61–72. [DOI]

3. Filardi M, Pizza F, Tonetti L, Antelmi E, Natale V, Plazzi G. Attention impairments and ADHD symptoms in adult narcoleptic patients with and without hypocretin deficiency. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0182085. [DOI]

4. Rafalovich A. Psychodynamic and neurological perspectives on ADHD: Exploring strategies for defining a phenomenon. J Theory of Social Behaviour. 2001;31(4):397–418. [DOI]

5. Strehl U, Aggensteiner P, Wachtlin D, Brandeis D, Albrecht B, Arana M, et al. Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A multicenter randomized trial controlling for unspecific effects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:135. [DOI]

6. Arns M, Heinrich H, Strehl U. Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol. 2014;95:108–15. [DOI]

7. Leins U, Goth G, Hinterberger T, Klinger C, Rumpf N, Strehl U. Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: a comparison of SCP and Theta/Beta protocols. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007;32(2):73–88. [DOI]

8. Marx A-M, Ehlis A-C, Furdea A, Holtmann M, Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) neurofeedback as a treatment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1038. [DOI]

9. Arns M, Conners CK, Kraemer HC. A decade of EEG Theta/Beta ratio research in ADHD: a meta-analysis. J Atten Disord. 2013;17(5):374–83. [DOI]

10. Arns M, de Ridder S, Strehl U, Breteler M, Coenen A. Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: the effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009;40(3):180–9. [DOI]

11. Fuchs T, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Gruzelier JH, Kaiser J. Neurofeedback treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a comparison with methylphenidate. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003;28(1):1–12. [DOI]

12. Cooper WO, Habel LA, Sox CM, Chan KA, Arbogast PG, Cheetham TC, et al. ADHD drugs and serious cardiovascular events in children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(20):1896–904. [DOI]

13. Rossiter T. The effectiveness of neurofeedback and stimulant drugs in treating AD/HD: part II. Replication. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2004;29(4):233–43. [DOI]

14. Sarmad Z, Bazargan Harandi A, Hejazi Z. Ravesh-haye tahghigh dar oloum raftari [Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences]. Tehran: Agah Pub; 2008. [Persian]

15. Sandford JA., Turner A. Manual for the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test. Richmond, VA: Braintrain; 1995.

16. Turner DC, Clark L, Dowson J, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ. Modafinil improves cognition and response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55(10):1031–40. [DOI]

17. Besharat MA, Hamidi S, Rostami R, Farahani H. The effectiveness of neurofeedback training on EEG among children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Contemporary psychology. 2013;7(1):3–16. [Persian] [Article]

18. Rajabi S. Efficacy of neurofeedback in the correct brain’s wave’s amplitudeand the visual-motor continuous performance with ADHD. Journal of Psychology. 2015;19(1):53–70. [Persian] [Article]

19. Marca JPL, O’Connor RE. Neurofeedback as an intervention to improve reading achievement in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, inattentive subtype. NeuroRegulation. 2016;3(2):55. [DOI]

20. Thompson L, Thompson M. Neurofeedback Intervention for Adults with ADHD. J Adult Dev. 2005;12(2):123–30. [DOI]

21. Vlek RJ, Steines D, Szibbo D, Kübler A, Schneider M-J, Haselager P, et al. Ethical issues in brain-computer interface research, development, and dissemination. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012;36(2):94–9. [DOI]

22. Lansbergen MM, van Dongen-Boomsma M, Buitelaar JK, Slaats-Willemse D. ADHD and EEG-neurofeedback: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled feasibility study. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011;118(2):275–84. [DOI]

23. Thibault RT, Raz A. The psychology of neurofeedback: Clinical intervention even if applied placebo. Am Psychol. 2017;72(7):679–88. [DOI]