Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 31 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Danesh M, Nazari A M. Recognizing the Problems of Couples Under the Auspices of The Relief Committee Experience During Divorce Process. MEJDS 2022; 12 :31-31
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2100-en.html
1- Counseling Department, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd Branch,
2- Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (1086 Views)

Background & Objectives: The family is one of the most important social systems based on marriage between the opposite sexes. However, no relationship, including marriage, is smooth. In all relationships, there is conflict and negative emotions. As a result, problems in intimate relationships ultimately affect each party. High divorce rates in Iran and the world clearly show marital problems. Couples usually experience incompatibility in the early years of marriage because they have not yet achieved sufficient mutual harmony. One center that covers couples in Iran is the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee. Given the importance of marital relationships, effective methods should be used to prevent the adverse consequences of dysfunctional relationships, confusion and distress in families, divorce and family breakdown, and ultimately the breakdown of society. The importance of the family is felt in the individual and social life of human beings. Therefore, marriage can be considered one of the stages of human development.
Methods: This study sought to understand and recognize the mental experience of humans, so we employed a qualitative research design. Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted an in–depth study of the participants' mental experiences. The study's statistical population comprised all divorcing couples under the auspices of the Relief Committee in 2019. Fourteen couples from the Relief Committee were interviewed, and the relevant data were collected. In this method, MAXQDA software was used to analyze the qualitative data.
Results: Based on the results, 57 initial codes were identified out of 378 concepts. The results of axial coding revealed four categories of psychological and individual behavior (including a lack of self–confidence, suspicion and distrust, excessive psychological stress and anxiety, lack of motivation and enthusiasm for cohabitation, increased expectations, unrealistic expectations, and failure), socio–cultural category (including the elimination of the taboo of divorce in society, personality differences, early marriage, lack of support from married couples, quarrels, bad friends, the negative impact of media and social networks, differences in education), economic category (such as lack of financial support, weak government support policies, daily devaluation of money, problems with facilities, low income) and religious categories (such as non–adherence to moral and religious principles, atheism, weakness of religious beliefs, or reliance on God).
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, psychological and individual, cultural–social, economic, and religious factors are influential in marital problems of divorcing couples under the auspices of the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee. Therefore, by teaching conflict resolution management to divorcing couples, institutionalizing a culture of patience and compromise, and using reliable counseling centers, the scope of disputes and conflicts can be reduced and controlled.

Full-Text [PDF 469 kb]   (296 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References
1. Adamsons K. Handbook of family theories: a content‐based approach. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2015;7(4):520–2. [DOI]
2. Ahmad S, Reid DW. Relationship satisfaction among South Asian Canadians: the role of 'complementary-equality'and listening to understand. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships. 2008;2(2):131–50.
3. Bali A, Dhingra R, Baru A. Marital adjustment of childless couples. Journal of Social Sciences. 2010;24(1):73–6. [DOI]
4. Bélanger C, Di Schiavi M-F, Sabourin S, Dugal C, El Baalbaki G, Lussier Y. Self-esteem, coping efforts and marital adjustment. Eur J Psychol. 2014;10(4):660–71. [DOI]
5. Bodenmann G, Ledermann T, Bradbury TN. Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships. 2007;14(4):551–69. [DOI]
6. Priyadharshini S, Gopalan RT. Marital adjustment, love, personal intimacy, personality, dyadic coping and spirituality on marital stability. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. 2020;7(4):1–16. [DOI]
7. Robson SM, McCullough MB, Rex S, Munafò MR, Taylor G. Family meal frequency, diet, and family functioning: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2020;52(5):553–64. [DOI]
8. Zare B, Safyari Jafarabad H. The study of marital satisfaction and its determinants on married women and men in Tehran city. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2015;13(1):111-40. [DOI]
9. Salimi Bajestani H, rahimi R, Farahbakhsh K, Asgari M. Financial conflicts and compatibility in dual-career couples: a phenomenological study. Social Welfare Quarterly. 2020;20(76):39-86. [Article]
10. Ghasemi F, Askarizadeh G, Mosavi-Nasab SM. Relationship of personality traits, religious attitude and sexual satisfaction with tendency towards divorcee in paramedic females. Journal of Research on Religion & Health. 2020;5(4):20–33. [Persian] [DOI]
11. Samadaee Gelehkolaee K, Mccarthy BW, Khalilian A, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Peyvandi S, Elyasi F, et al. Factors associated with marital satisfaction in infertile couple: a comprehensive literature review. Global Journal of Health Science. 2015;8(5):96–109. [DOI]
12. Sorokowski P, Randall AK, Groyecka A, Frackowiak T, Cantarero K, Hilpert P, et al. Marital Satisfaction, Sex, Age, Marriage Duration, Religion, Number of Children, Economic Status, Education, and Collectivistic Values: Data from 33 Countries. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1199. [DOI]
13. Pirak A, Negarandeh R, Khakbazan Z. Post-divorce regret among iranian women: a qualitative study. International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery. 2019;7(1). [DOI]
14. Asanjarani F, Jazayeri RS, Fatehizade M, Etemadi O, Demol J. Exploring factors affecting post-divorce adjustment in Iranian women: A qualitative study. Social Determinants of Health. 2017;3(1). [DOI]
15. Mesbahi Jahromi N, Mirabi VR, Mohebi S, Bagheri M. Identify gaps in the implementation of social commerce among start-ups. Intelligent business management studies. 2019;7(30):163-88. [Article]
16. Filipović S, Vukosavljević-Gvozden T, Opačić G. Irrational beliefs, dysfunctional emotions, and marital adjustment: a structural model. Journal of Family Issues. 2016;37(16):2333–50. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb