Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 69 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.TNB.REC.1399.012

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Poorhejazi M, Khalatbari J, Ghorban Shiroudi S, Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A. Studying the Effectiveness of a Treatment Package Designed Based on McMaster Transdiagnostic Therapy Model (Focused on Compassion and Mindfulness) on Family Function and Distress Tolerance of Women With Marital Conflict. MEJDS 2022; 12 :69-69
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2312-en.html
1- Department of Consulting, Faculty Humanities, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Faculty Member, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Psychology and Education Science Department, Humanities Faculty, Khatam University
Abstract:   (1252 Views)

Background & Objectives: If the marital conflict is not resolved, it will cause inefficiency and inability of the couple. Therefore, teaching how to resolve conflict is essential to building a satisfying relationship. Factors that can be effective in marital conflict are family function and distress tolerance. Considering the role of psychological factors in women with marital conflicts and the use of multiple therapies and their effectiveness, and that most studies conducted to reduce conflicts and divorce have had a similar method and form, the psychological package in this research method can be very effective due to the high homogeneity with the existing context. Everything in this package has arisen from the basics of research related to the field and seeks to combine different methods to reduce marital conflict. The effectiveness of a treatment package based on transdiagnostic therapies of the McMaster model focused on compassion and mindfulness are examined in the family function and distress tolerance of women with marital conflict.
Methods: This applied research is a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest design, a control group, and a 3–month follow–up. The statistical population of this study comprised all women with marital conflict who were referred to four selected counseling centers in the west of Tehran City, Iran, in the spring of 2019 who answered the Marital Conflict Questionnaire Sanai and Barati (2008). Then, 100 women who obtained the highest scores of marital conflict were chosen. Next, the Family Assessment Device (Epstein et al., 1983) and Distress Tolerance Scale (Simons & Gaher, 2005) were administered to them. Afterward, among eligible individuals, 24 women with a high score on family performance and a low score on distress tolerance volunteered and participated in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups: control and experiment. However, two people from each group dropped out, and the number of each group was reduced to 10. The inclusion criteria included having a high score on the Marital Conflict Questionnaire, being 25 to 45 years old, lacking drug addiction, having at least a diploma, not receiving psychological interventions at the study time, and having passed at least one year since their marriage. The exclusion criteria were an absence of more than two sessions from the therapy package. The experimental group underwent 12 therapy sessions designed based on McMaster transdiagnostic therapies, focused on compassion and mindfulness. The control group did not undergo any intervention. Both groups were followed up three months after the intervention. To analyze the data, in the descriptive statistics section, the central and dispersion indices, including the mean and standard deviation, were used. In the inferential statistics section, the repeated measures analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used. Also, to compare two groups in terms of demographic variables (duration of marriage, age, education), the Chi–square test was used. The aforementioned statistical analyzes were performed in SPSS version 24. The significance level of the tests was considered 0.05.
Results: The analysis of variance of family performance was significant for intragroup (time) (p<0.001) and intergroup (p=0.042) factors. Also, the analysis of the variance of distress tolerance variable for intragroup (time) (p<0.001) and intergroup (p<0.001) factors were significant. Thus, for both variables of family function and distress tolerance, there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups during the research stages, indicating the effect of the intervention. The mean score of family function in the experimental group in the posttest was lower than that in the pretest (p<0.001). Also, family function in the follow–up stage was significantly different from the pretest (p=0.004). There was no significant difference between the posttest and follow–up (p=0.975). The results showed that the distress tolerance scores in the experimental group in the posttest were higher than those in the pretest (p<0.001). In the follow–up stage, there was a significant difference from the pretest (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed between the posttest and follow–up (p=0.981).
Conclusion: Based on the study findings, the designed transdiagnostic package effectively improved family function and distress tolerance of women with marital conflict, and this package can be used to reduce marital conflicts.

Full-Text [PDF 663 kb]   (386 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References
1. Sexton CS, Perlman DS. Couples’ career orientation, gender role orientation, and perceived equity as determinants of marital power. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51(4):933-41. [DOI]
2. Richardson R. Couples in conflict: a family systems approach to marriage counseling Fortress Press; Illustrated edition; 2010.
3. Gottman JM. The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1993;61(1):6-15. [DOI]
4. Bakhshipour A, Vojodi B, Mahmood Alilo M, Abdi R. The effectiveness of integrated Transdiagnostic Treatment in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder. Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2016;11(41):67–76. [Persian] [Article]
5. Portes PR, Howell SC, Brown JH, Eichenberger S, Mas CA. Family functions and children’s postdivorce adjustment. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1992;62(4):613–7. [DOI]
6. Zvolensky MJ, Bernstein A, Vujanovic AA. Distress tolerance: theory, research, and clinical application. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
7. Simons JS, Gaher RM. The distress tolerance scale: development and validation of a self-report measure. Motiv Emot. 2005;29(2):83–102. [DOI]
8. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54. [DOI]
9. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster family assessment device. J Marital Fam Ther. 1983;9(2):171–80. [DOI]
10. Neff KD. The science of self-compassion. In: Germer C, Siegel RD; editors. Wisdom and compassion in psychotherapy: deepening mindfulness in clinical practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012. pp: 79–92.
11. Crane R. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Second edition. London: Routledge Pub; 2017.
12. Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment. 2004;11(3):191–206. [DOI]
13. Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Fairholme CP, Ellard KK, Boisseau CL, Allen LB, et al. Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: therapist guide. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
14. Sanai B. Family & marriage scales. Tehran: Besat Publications; 2010. [Persian]
15. Najarian F. Avamele mo’ser dar karaei khanevade (barrasiye vizhegi haye ravan sanji meghyas sanjesh khanevade FAD) [Factors affecting family efficiency (family measurement scale psychometric properties) FAD] [Thesis for MSc]. [Roudehen, Iran]: Islamic Azad University of Roodehen; 1995. [Persian]
16. Zadehmohammadi A, Malek Khosravi Gh. Barrasiye moghadamati vizhegi haye ravan sanji va etebar yabi meghyas karkard khanevade FAD [The preliminary study of psychometric and reliability of family assessment device (FAD)]. Family Research.1385;2(5):69–89. [Persian]
17. Alavi Kh, Modarres Gharavi M, Amin Yazdi SA, Salehi Fadardi J. Effectiveness of group dialectical behavior therapy (based on core mindfulness, distress tolerance and emotion regulation components) on depressive symptoms in university students. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2011;13(50):124-35. [DOI]
18. Yöntem MK. Development of Family Functions and Relationship in Families: A Mixed-Design Study. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2019;47(5):344–59. [DOI]
19. Mostofi Sarkari A, Ghamari M, Hosseinian S. Comparing the effectiveness of psychological training based on olson and mcmaster models in enhancing family functioning of female teachers. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research. 2020;16(4):23–40. [Persian] [Article]
20. Karimi N, Babakhani V, Amiri Majd M. Asarbakhshiye olgouye karkarde khanevade (McMaster) bar samimiyat zanashoo’i zojeyn [The effectiveness of family functioning model (McMaster) on marital intimacy of couples]. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2015;7(23):233–63. [Persian]
21. Babakhani V. Moghayese asarbakhsiye amuzesh olguye McMaster and Feldman bar zehnagahi va kaheshe ta’aroze zanashyi [Comparing the effectiveness of McMaster and Feldman's model training on mindfulness and marital conflicts of couples] [PhD dissertation]. [Tehran, Iran]. Science and Branch Research, Islamic Azad University; 2011.
22. Saeedpoor F, Asghari F, Sayadi A. Comparison the effectiveness of Bowen family therapy approach and McMaster's model on intimacy, cognitive emotion regulation and family function in couples who exposed to divorce. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy .2019;8(2):191–214. [Persian] [Article]
23. Fahim Danesh F, Noferesti A. Pish bini rezayat zanashoo’i bar asas bakhshesh, khoshbini va shafaghat be khod [prediction of marital satisfaction based on forgiveness, optimism and self-compassion]. In: 7th Congress of the Iranian Psychological Association [Internet]. Tehran: Iranian Psychological Association; 2019. [Persian]
24. Neff KD, Beretvas SN. The role of self-compassion in romantic relationships. Self Identity. 2013;12(1):78–98. [DOI]
25. Arimitsu K, Hofmann SG. Cognitions as mediators in the relationship between self-compassion and affect. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;74:41–8. [DOI]
26. Shojaei Vazhnany F, Sohrabi A, Azizi A, Mohammadi Rayegani M, Nasiri Hanis G. The Effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy on couple’s marital intimacy and emotion regulation. Rooyesh. 2020;8(12):11–20. [Persian] [Article]
27. Burpee LC, Langer EJ. Mindfulness and marital satisfaction. J Adult Dev. 2005;12(1):43–51. [DOI]
28. Barnes S, Brown KW, Krusemark E, Campbell WK, Rogge RD. The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. J Marital Fam Ther. 2007;33(4):482–500. [DOI]
29. Harvey Knowles J, Manusov V, Crowley J. Minding your matters: predicting satisfaction, commitment, and conflict strategies from trait mindfulness. Interpersona. 2015;9(1):44–58. [DOI]
30. Kimmes JG, Jaurequi ME, Roberts K, Harris VW, Fincham FD. An examination of the association between relationship mindfulness and psychological and relational well‐being in committed couples. J Marital Fam Ther. 2020;46(1):30–41. [DOI]
31. McGill J, Adler-Baeder F, Rodriguez P. Mindfully in Love: A meta-analysis of the association between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences & Extension. 2016;4(1):89–101.
32. Keshavarz Mohammadi R, Khalatbari J. Effectiveness of self-compassion on distress tolerance, emotion regulation and anxiety sensitivity in divorced women. Journal of Family Pathology, Counseling & Enrichment. 2018;4(1):17–32 [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb