Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 139 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farhadi I, Barati F. Determining the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Training on Psychological Well-Being, School Adjustment, and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies in Anxious Children. MEJDS 2022; 12 :139-139
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2518-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Sciences and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Educational Sciences, Khoy Branch, Payam Noor University
Abstract:   (1564 Views)

Background & Objectives: Anxiety plays an important role in reducing positive psychological characteristics and traits such as psychological well–being, school adjustment and cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Psychological well–being means having a positive feeling and attitude towards oneself for growth, development, and prosperity. Also, adjustment is the process of adapting to new and stressful situations, and school adjustment refers to the student's ability to adapt to educational conditions, school environment, teachers, and students and emotional adaptation in interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships. In addition, cognitive emotion regulation strategies refer to cognitive strategies and methods for monitoring, evaluating and modifying emotional responses or managing emotional information. Emotion regulation training is one of the most effective ways to improve psychological characteristics, which helps people to identify their incompatible and inefficient beliefs and thoughts and replace them with flexible beliefs and strategies. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the effectiveness of emotion regulation training on psychological well–being, school adjustment, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxious children.
Methods: The present study was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design and control group. The research population included anxious primary school children of Ahvaz City, Iran, during the 2019–20 academic year. Considering the inclusion criteria, 40 students were selected by purposive sampling method and assigned into two groups by simple random method (each group 20 people). The inclusion criteria included obtaining a minimum score of 35 on the Anxiety Children Questionnaire (Spence, 1979), no history of rejection in previous grades, not receiving psychological services in the last three months, and no history of receiving emotion regulation training. Also, the exclusion criteria included an absence of more than one session and withdrawal from continuing cooperation. The experimental group participated in eight 90–min sessions of emotion regulation training and the control group did not receive any training. The intervention was performed by the first researcher in one of the counseling centers related to the Education Administration of Ahvaz City for one month (two sessions per week). The research instruments were the Psychological Well–Being Scale (Ryff, 1989), School Adjustment Inventory (Sinha and Singh, 1993), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (Garnefski et al., 2001), and Anxiety Children Questionnaire (Spence, 1979). In this research, descriptive statistics indicators (mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage) were used to describe the data. Data were analyzed by the Chi–square test, the independent t test, and univariate analysis of covariance methods in SPSS software version 19 at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The results of the independent t test showed that experimental and control groups in the pretest stage had no significance different in terms of psychological well–being (p=0.556), school adjustment (p=0.365), positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies (p=0.436), and negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies (p=0.819). However, posttest results showed significant differences in terms of variables of psychological well–being (p<0.001), school adjustment (p=0.005), positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies (p<0.001), and negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies (p<0.001). According to the effect size, 87% of these changes in psychological well–being, 84% in school adjustment, 91% in positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and 85% in negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies have resulted in the effectiveness of emotion regulation training.
Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, emotion regulation training had an effective role in improving psychological well–being, school adjustment, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxious children. Then, psychologists and therapists can use emotion regulation training to improve the psychological characteristics of anxious children.

Full-Text [PDF 601 kb]   (519 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Sun J, Luo Y, Chang H, Zhang R, Liu R, Jiang Y, et al. The mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in bis/bas sensitivities, depression, and anxiety among community-dwelling older adults in China. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:939–48. [DOI]
2. Luna D, Urquiza-Flores DI, Figuerola-Escoto RP, Carreño-Morales C, Meneses-González F. Academic and sociodemographic predictors of anxiety and psychological well-being in Mexican medical students. Transversal study. Gac Med Mex. 2019;156(1):2456. [DOI]
3. Ooi LL, Nocita G, Coplan RJ, Zhu J, Rose-Krasnor L. Beyond bashful: examining links between social anxiety and young children’s socio-emotional and school adjustment. Early Child Res Q. 2017;41:74–83. [DOI]
4. Wahl AK, Osborne RH, Larsen MH, Andersen MH, Holter IA, Borge CR. Exploring health literacy needs in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): associations between demographic, clinical variables, psychological well-being and health literacy. Heart & Lung. 2021;50(3):417–24. [DOI]
5. Garner PW, Dunsmore JC, Bassett HH. Direct and indirect pathways to early school adjustment: roles of young children’s mental representations and peer victimization. Early Child Res Q. 2020;51:100–9. [DOI]
6. Oh I, Song J. Mediating effect of emotional/behavioral problems and academic competence between parental abuse/neglect and school adjustment. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2018;86:393–402. [DOI]
7. Rey L, Neto F, Extremera N. Cyberbullying victimization and somatic complaints: a prospective examination of cognitive emotion regulation strategies as mediators. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020;20(2):135–9. [DOI]
8. LeBlanc S, Uzun B, Aydemir A, Mohiyeddini C. Validation of an emotion regulation training program on mental well-being. Psychol Rep. 2020;123(5):1518–36. [DOI]
9. Haynos AF, Hill B, Fruzzetti AE. Emotion regulation training to reduce problematic dietary restriction: an experimental analysis. Appetite. 2016;103:265–74. [DOI]
10. Ashkani F, Heydari H. Effects of emotional adjustment on psychological welfare and attributional styles of students with learning disabilities in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2014;4(1):119–25. [Persian] [Article]
11. Ghazavi Z, Zighami R, Sarichello MI, Shahsavari S. The effects of educating cognitive emotion regulation strategies on psychological well-being of nurses’ resiliency in departments of psychiatry. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2019;7(4):64–73. [Persian] [Article]
12. Kitahara Y, Mearns J, Shimoyama H. Emotion regulation and middle school adjustment in Japanese girls: mediation by perceived social support. Jpn Psychol Res. 2020;62(2):138–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12280
13. Badri R, Nemati S, Mohseni Nezhad L. Investigating emotion regulation skills training on academic adjustment in students with specific learning disabilities. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:127. [Persian] [Article]
14. Dehghani Y, Hekmatian Fard S, Kamran L. Effectiveness of emotional regulation training in improving adaptability and social adequacy of students with learning disabilities. Quarterly of Applied Psychology. 2019;13(2):229–50. [Persian] [Article]
15. Nourali H, Hajiyakhchali A, Shehniyailagh M, Maktabi Gh. The effects of teaching cognitive regulation of emotion strategies on social adjustment and well-being of male gifted students. Journal of Psychological Achievements. 2018;25(2):91–110. [Persian] [Article]
16. Spence SH. Structure of anxiety symptoms among children: A confirmatory factor-analytic study. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106(2):280–97. [DOI]
17. Bakhtiari Z, Asadi J, Bayani AA. Comparison the effectiveness of “drama therapy” and resilience training on anxiety and aggression of children with depression. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2020;9(5):34–47. [Persian] [Article]
18. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069–81. [DOI]
19. Khanjani M, Shahidi Sh, Fath-Abadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff’s Scale of Psychological Well-Being, Short Form (18-item) among male and female students. Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2014;8(32):27–36. [Persian] [Article]
20. Sinha AP, Singh RP. The Adjustment Inventory for School Students (AISS). Agra: National Psychological Corporation; 1993.
21. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Pers Individ Dif. 2001;30(8):1311–27. [DOI]
22. Besharat MA, Bazazzian S. Psychometric properties of cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire in a sample of Iranian society. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2014;24(84):61–70. [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb