Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 74 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghorbani S, Rajaee M, Amani O. Predicting the Tendency to Extramarital Relationships Based on the Four Dark Personality Traits and Emotional Intelligence in Couples with Marital Conflicts. MEJDS 2023; 13 :74-74
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2569-en.html
1- MA in Family Counseling, Counseling Group and Psychology, Allame Tabataba’ee University, Tehran, Iran
2- PhD Student in Health Psychology, Department of Health, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3- PhD in Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology and Health, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1421 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Extramarital affairs harm marriage and family, especially in conflicted relationships. Extramarital affairs have a lot of reasons, including personality characteristics. Dark personality tetrad, among the recent personality characteristics, encompasses 3 different components (Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy) that may overlap each other. Dark personality tetrad has been presented in many studies with different variables, including emotional intelligence. There is insufficient research about dark personality and emotional intelligence. Family stands out as the most essential unit of society, and understanding the reason for marital conflicts and extramarital affairs can help preserve family solidarity. This study was conducted to predict the tendency to extramarital relationships based on the dark personality tetrad and emotional intelligence in couples with marital conflict.
Methods: This research was a correlational study. The statistical population of this research consisted of all couples with marital conflicts living in Tehran City, Iran, who were referred to one of the psychology services clinics in 2019 to attend educational workshops. Individuals were selected by the convenience sampling method and answered the Marital Conflict Scale (Barati & Sanaee, 1999). Out of these individuals, 150 (75 couples) were recognized with marital conflicts, evidenced by scores higher than 114 on the marital conflict scale. Afterward, they answered the Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (Siberia–Schering, 1996), the Dark Tetrad Personality Scale (Yousefi & Imanzad, 2018), and Tendency Toward Extramarital Affairs (Whatley, 2008). The inclusion criteria were desire and informed consent to participate in the research, being married, and obtaining a score of at least 114 on the Marital Conflict Scale (Barati & Sanaee, 1999). The exclusion criteria were non–cooperation, being divorced, incomplete filling out the questionnaires, and not obtaining the minimum score of the marital conflict scale. Data was described using descriptive statistics indicators (mean and standard deviation). The Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis. The significance level of statistical tests was 0.01. Data analysis was done in SPSS version 22.
Results: Results showed that the tendency to extramarital affairs had a negative and significant relationship with emotional intelligence (p<0.001, r=–0.702). Also, the tendency to extramarital affairs showed a positive and significant relationship with the four dark personality traits: narcissism (r=0.858, p<0.001), sociopathy (r=0.669, p<0.001), Machiavellianism (r=0.651, p<0.001), and sadism (r=0.461, p<0.001). Also, machiavellian, psychopath, and sadism could not predict extramarital affairs (p>0.01). Still, emotional intelligence (p<0.001, β= –0.414) and narcissism in the four dark personality traits (p<0.001, β=0.574) could predict the tendency to extramarital affairs.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the research, the tendency to extramarital affairs is predicted by emotional intelligence and the narcissistic component in the four dark personality traits.

Full-Text [PDF 584 kb]   (371 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Beam CR, Marcus K, Turkheimer E, Emery RE. Gender differences in the structure of marital quality. Behav Genet. 2018;48(3):209–23. [DOI]
2. Frankel LA, Umemura T, Jacobvitz D, Hazen N. Marital conflict and parental responses to infant negative emotions: Relations with toddler emotional regulation. Infant Behav Dev. 2015;40:73–83. [DOI]
3. Macher S. Social interdependence in close relationships: the actor-partner-interdependence-investment model (API-IM): actor-partner-interdependence-investment model. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2013;43(1):84–96. [DOI]
4. Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Jacobson NS. Understanding infidelity: correlates in a national random sample. J Fam Psychol. 2001;15(4):735–49. [DOI]
5. Jackman M. Understanding the cheating heart: what determines infidelity intentions? Sexuality & Culture. 2015;19(1):72–84. [DOI]
6. Buss DM. Sexual and emotional infidelity: evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(2):155–60. [DOI]
7. Fincham FD, May RW. Infidelity in romantic relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:70–4. [DOI]
8. Ein-Dor T, Perry-Paldi A, Hirschberger G, Birnbaum GE, Deutsch D. Coping with mate poaching: gender differences in detection of infidelity-related threats. Evol Hum Behav. 2015;36(1):17–24. [DOI]
9. Mark KP, Janssen E, Milhausen RR. Infidelity in heterosexual couples: demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(5):971–82. [DOI]
10. Watkins SJ, Boon SD. Expectations regarding partner fidelity in dating relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2016;33(2):237–56. [DOI]
11. Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M. Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(1):1–12. [DOI]
12. Kaiser RB, LeBreton JM, Hogan J. The dark side of personality and extreme leader behavior: dark-side traits and leadership. J Appl Psychol. 2015;64(1):55–92. [DOI]
13. Jones DN, Weiser DA. Differential infidelity patterns among the dark triad. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;57:20–4. [DOI]
14. Ardic K, Özsoy E. Examining the relationship between the dark triad traits and big five personality dimensions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Academic Research Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Banking [Internet]. Istanbul, Turkey; 2016.
15. Buzina N. Psychopathy - historical controversies and new diagnostic approach. Psychiatr Danub. 2012;24(2):134–42.
16. Chabrol H, Van Leeuwen N, Rodgers R, Séjourné N. Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Pers Individ Dif. 2009;47(7):734–9. [DOI]
17. Međedović J, Petrović B. The dark tetrad: structural properties and location in the personality space. J Individ Differ. 2015;36(4):228–36. [DOI]
18. Zeidner M, Kloda I. Emotional intelligence (EI), conflict resolution patterns, and relationship satisfaction: actor and partner effects revisited. Pers Individ Dif. 2013;54(2):278–83. [DOI]
19. O'Meara A, Davies J, Hammond S. The psychometric properties and utility of the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale (SSIS). Psychol Assess. 2011;23(2):523–31. [DOI]
20. Apostolou M, Paphiti C, Neza E, Damianou M, Georgiadou P. Mating performance: exploring emotional intelligence, the dark triad, jealousy and attachment effects. Journal of Relationships Research. 2019;10:E1. [DOI]
21. Miao C, Humphrey RH, Qian S, Pollack JM. The relationship between emotional intelligence and the dark triad personality traits: a meta-analytic review. J Res Pers. 2019;78:189–97. [DOI]
22. Nagler UKJ, Reiter KJ, Furtner MR, Rauthmann JF. Is there a "dark intelligence"? emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;65:47–52. [DOI]
23. Boyatzis RE, Sala F. The Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI). In: Geher G; editor. Measuring emotional intelligence: common ground and controversy. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2004.
24. Jalil T, Muazzam A. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of marital adjustment to infertility. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology. 2013;2(3):45–58. [DOI]
25. Malouff JM, Schutte NS, Thorsteinsson EB. Trait emotional intelligence and romantic relationship satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Am J Fam Ther. 2014;42(1):53–66. [DOI]
26. Borhanizad S, Abdi R. The role of dark triad in prediction of intimacy and attitudes to infidelity in applying for divorce couples. Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology 2017;12(45):17–26. [Persian] [Article]
27. Jones DN. What's mine is mine and what's yours is mine: the dark triad and gambling with your neighbor's money. J Res Pers. 2013;47(5):563–71. [DOI]
28. Chamorro-Premuzic T. The dark side of emotional intelligence. Management Today. 2014;10:60.
29. Haji Adineh S, Kalhornia Golkar M. The relationship between emotional and spiritual intelligence and the attitude of students toward extramarital relations. Salamat Ijtimai (Community Health). 2019;6(4):380–8. [Persian] [DOI]
30. Omrani S, Jomehri F, Ahadi H. Prediction of marital adjustment based on metacognitive beliefs with mediating effect of marital conflicts. Journal of Psychological Science. 2018;17(68):501–8. [Persian] [Article]
31. Green SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26(3):499–510. [DOI]
32. Yousefi R, Imanzad A. Validating the dark tetrad personality model. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2018;24(2):190–201. [Persian] [DOI]
33. Jonason PK, Webster GD. The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychol Assess. 2010;22(2):420–32. [DOI]
34. Yousefi R, Piri F. Psychometric properties of Persian version of Dirty Dozen Scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology. 2016;22(1):67–76. [Persian] [Article]
35. O'Meara A, Davies J, Hammond S. The psychometric properties and utility of the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale (SSIS). Psychol Assess. 2011;23(2):523–31. [DOI]
36. Afkhami I, Bahrami F, Fatehizade M. Barrasiye rabeteye beyn mizan bakhshoodegi va ta'aroz zanashooei zojeyn dar ostan Yazd [A correlational study on couples' forgiveness and marital conflicts in Yazd province]. Journal of Family Research. 2007;3(9):431–42. [Persian]
37. Whatley MA. Attitudes toward Infidelity Scale. Choices in Relationships. 2008;19.
38. Yoosefi N, Karimipour B, Amani A. The study model of religious beliefs, conflict resolution styles, and marital commitment with attitudes toward marital infidelity. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling. 2017;6(1):47–64. [Persian] [Article]
39. Habibi M, Sayed Alitabar SH, Pouravari M, Salehi S. Reliability, validity and factor structure for the attitudes toward Infidelity Scale. J Research Health. 2019;9(4):294–301. [DOI]
40. Kakavand M, Rezaei A. The effect of emotional inteligence dimentions on the educational achievement at agricultural students of Razi University, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research. 2021;13(56):73-90. [Persian] [DOI]
41. Zarei F, Akbarzadeh I, Khosravi A. Self‐esteem mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction in Iranian students. International Journal of Health Studies. 2019;5(4):11–4. [DOI]
42. Kheirmand M, Kheirmand F, Pazhouhan A. The relationship between emotional intelligence and occupational stress among nurses of Alzahra hospital in Isfahan. Hospital. 2016;15(1):59–68. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb