Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 189 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.MEDILAM.REC.1399.281

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kouchi T, Ahmadi V, Mami S, Nademi A. Investigating the Relationship Between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Psychological Well-being of University Students in Ilam City, Iran Through Positive and Negative Affect. MEJDS 2022; 12 :189-189
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2695-en.html
1- PhD Student in General Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
Abstract:   (1241 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: A positive approach to mental health, which has spread widely in the last century, has led to the emergence of concepts such as psychological well–being, excitement, and mental health. Psychologists and researchers in this field have always considered Well–being in scientific and academic environments. Identifying the factors affecting the psychological well–being of students is important because young people are a large part of society and are in an age situation that may cause a lot of stress in various aspects of life. Therefore, if they do not have good psychological well–being, these stresses and stressors will have devastating effects on their lives. Accordingly, by reviewing the research conducted on the factors affecting psychological well–being, the present study investigated the relationship between cognitive strategies for emotion regulation and psychological well–being of students in Ilam City, Iran through positive and negative affects.
Methods: The present study was a correlational analysis based on structural equation modeling. The study’s statistical population comprised all students of Ilam universities who were studying in these universities in the academic year of 2019–2020. Of them, 350 students were selected by multi–stage cluster sampling. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age range from 18 to 40 years, being a student and providing informed consent in research. The exclusion criterion was failure to complete the questionnaires. The tools used in this study to evaluate the variables were the Psychological Well–Being Scale (Ryff, 2002), The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski et al., 2001), and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (Watson et al., 1988). For data analysis, descriptive statistics indicators (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (skewness and kurtosis values, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, structural equation modeling) were performed using SPSS version 25 and AMOS version 20 software at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the direct effect coefficients of an adaptive strategy to positive affect (p<0.001, β=0.391), negative affect (p<0.001, β=–0.290), and psychological well–being (p<0.001, β=0.489), and direct effect coefficients of non–adaptive strategy to positive affect (p<0.001, β=–0.280), negative affect (p<0.001, β=0.220), and psychological well–being (p<0.001, β=–0.295) were significant. The coefficients of the direct effect of positive affect on psychological well–being (p<0.001, β=0.320) and negative affect on psychological well–being (p<0.001, β=–0.285) were also significant. Mediation relationship analysis also showed that the indirect effect coefficients of indirect adaptive strategies of emotion regulation on students' psychological well–being through positive affect (p<0.001, β=0.125) and through negative affect (p<0.001, β=0.08) were significant. Also, the coefficients of the indirect effect of standard non–adaptive strategies of emotion regulation on students' psychological well–being through positive affect (p<0.001, β=–0.09) and through negative affect (p<0.001 β=–0.062) were significant. The goodness of fit indicators showed the good fit of the studied conceptual model (χ2/dƒ=1.938, GFI=0.919, AGFI=0.911, RMSEA=0.062, NFI=0.915, CFI=0.960, IFI=0.918, TLI=0.927).
Conclusion: These results indicate that positive and negative affects mediated the relationship between cognitive strategies of emotion regulation and students' psychological well–being. Based on these findings, cognitive emotion regulation strategies can affect the psychological well–being of students by affecting the formation of positive and negative affects.

Full-Text [PDF 775 kb]   (576 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Chow HPH. Psychological well–being and scholastic achievement among university students in a Canadian Prairie City. Soc Psychol Educ. 2007;10(4):483–93. [DOI]
2. Sharma N, Nagle YK. Personality and resilience as determinants of psychological well–being among military children. Defence Life Science Journal. 2018;3(4):356–62. [DOI]
3. Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well–being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):719–27. [DOI]
4. Ryff CD. Psychological well–being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(1):10–28. [DOI]
5. Mahmoudzadeh S, Mohammadkhani P, Dolatshahi B, Moradi S. Prediction of psychological well–being based on dispositional mindfulness and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in students. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2015;3(3):195–202. [Persian] [Article]
6. Ghasemi N, Goudarzi M, Ghazanfari F. The effectiveness of compassion–based therapy on cognitive emotion regulation, shame and guilt–proneness and mindfulness components in patients with mixed anxiety–depression disorder. Clinical Psychology Studies. 2019;9(34):145–66. [Persian] [DOI]
7. Werner K, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation and psychopathology: a conceptual framework. In: Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2010. pp: 13–37.
8. Potthoff S, Garnefski N, Miklósi M, Ubbiali A, Domínguez-Sánchez FJ, Martins EC, et al. Cognitive emotion regulation and psychopathology across cultures: a comparison between six European countries. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016;98:218–24. [DOI]
9. Soleimani E, Habibi Y. The relationship between emotion regulation and resiliency with psychological well–being in students. Journal of School Psychology. 2015;3(4):51–72. [Persian] [Article]
10. Verzeletti C, Zammuner VL, Galli C, Agnoli S. Emotion regulation strategies and psychosocial well–being in adolescence. Cogent Psychology. 2016;3(1):1199294. [DOI]
11. Tortella–Feliu M, Balle M, Sesé A. Relationships between negative affectivity, emotion regulation, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in adolescents as examined through structural equation modeling. J Anxiety Disord. 2010;24(7):686–93. [DOI]
12. Malekpour F, Bassaknejad S. The relationship between fear of self–compassion and fear of happiness with binge eating disorder through the mediation of positive and negative affect in students. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2020;11(1):101–15. [Persian] [DOI]
13. Schäfer JÖ, Naumann E, Holmes EA, Tuschen-Caffier B, Samson AC. Emotion regulation strategies in depressive and anxiety symptoms in youth: a meta–analytic review. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(2):261–76. [Persian] [DOI]
14. Quoidbach J, Berry EV, Hansenne M, Mikolajczak M. Positive emotion regulation and well-being: comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010;49(5):368–73. [DOI]
15. Sayyah Bargard M, Olapour A, Ardame A, Shahidi S, Yaghoobi Askarabad E. Prediction of mental health and academic performance of students within cognitive emotional regulation strategies in Medical Sciences University of Jundishapur in Ahvaz. Educational Development of Judishapur. 2014;5(1):37–44. [Persian] [Article]
16. Yosefi J. The relationship between emotional regulation and positive and negative emotions with psychological well–being of students. Journal of Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences. 2015;3(6):66–74. [Persian]
17. Mazaheri M, Bahramian SH. Prediction of psychological well–being based on the positive and negative affection and coping self–efficacy. Positive Psychology Research. 2016;1(4):1–14. [Persian] [Article]
18. Besharat MA, Nia ME, Farahani H. Anger and major depressive disorder: the mediating role of emotion regulation and anger rumination. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;6(1):35–41. [DOI]
19. Taghipour B, Qolami F, Ranjbar MJ, Rostam Oqli Z, Barzegaran R. The role of positive and negative affect in predicting psychological well–being of athletic students. Journal of School Psychology. 2019;8(3):40–55. [Persian] [Article]
20. Shehni Yailagh M, Shojaie A, Behroozi N, Maktabi GH. The relationship between emotional intelligence, social skills and psychological well–being in female students’ of Shahid Chamran University. Psychological Achievements. 2011;18(1):73–92. [Persian] [Article]
21. World Health Organization Report. Mental health: new understanding, new hope. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
22. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. 3rd ed. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne: SAGE; 2017.
23. Khanjani M, Shahidi S, Fathabadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff’s Scale of Psychological Well–Being, Short Form (18–item) among male and female students. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2014;9(32):27–36. [Persian] [Article]
24. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30(8):1311–27. [DOI]
25. Hasani J. The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2010;2(3):73–84. [Persian] [DOI]
26. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–70. [DOI]
27. Azizi R, Yousefi Afrashte M, Morovati Z, Elahi T. The effect of teaching mindfulness in positive and negative emotions and emotion complexity study of changes over time. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2018;9(1):39–58. [Persian] [DOI]
28. Damasio AR. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam; 1994.
29. Salehi A, Mazaheri Z, Aghajani Z, Jahanbazi B. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the prediction of depression. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2017;16(1):108–17. [Persian] [Article]
30. Thompson RA. Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review. 1991;3(4):269–307.
31. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well–being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(2):348–62. [DOI]
32. Majad-Ara, Bigdeli, Najafi, Rashn. Direct and indirect impact of effects on anxiety and depression in elderly: the mediating role of difficulty in emotion regulation. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2016;8(2):89–98. [Persian] [Article]
33. Bakhshipour R, Dezhkam M. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS). Journal of Psychology. 2005;9(4):351–65. [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb