Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 160 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shafigh S, Bigdeli H, Khoeini F. Investigating the Effect of Executive Functions and Perception on the Reading Disorder Score of Elementary School Students with Reading Disorders (Mild to Severe Level). MEJDS 2023; 13 :160-160
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2844-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, East Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1040 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: In general, in the classification of learning disabilities, three areas of math disorder, writing disorder, and reading disorder can be mentioned. In elementary school students, reading disorder or dyslexia can be the most common type of disorder. Considering the numerous unpleasant consequences of reading learning disorders, such as multiple communication problems, illness and mental disorders, lack of scientific perspective, and many other consequences, investigating this type of disorder and the involved factors is of particular importance. It should be noted that despite various studies conducted in the field of learning disabilities in other countries and societies, there is no accurate information and statistics regarding the prevalence of learning disorders (mathematics, writing, and reading) and the causes affecting them in Iran. In other words, it can be said that our country is still at the beginning of the path in this field. Accordingly, to identify and treat students with learning disabilities and provide exceptional support to these children, identifying factors involved in reading disorders is an undeniable necessity and requires more research in this field. Therefore, the main topic of the present study was to investigate the effect of executive function and perception on elementary school students' reading disorder (from mild to severe level).
Methods: In this analytic correlational study, 224 students of Education District 2 of Tehran City, Iran, who had low, moderate, and high reading disorders according to Salimi's Reading Disorder Scale (Salimi, Teymori, 2007) were selected by available sampling method. The study data were collected using the Executive Function Scale BRIEF (Gioia et al., 2000) and the Future Perception Questionnaire (Moghbeli, 2017). A total of 208 questionnaires were returned as acceptable. The Executive Function Scale BRIEF was used to evaluate executive functions. This scale has two forms for parents and teachers and has 86 questions, the items scored by parents or teachers from 1 to 3. The Future Perception Questionnaire was used to measure perception, using the components of spatial awareness, visual perception, auditory perception, and sensory integration. Finally, to evaluate the disability of learning to read, the 27-item Reading Disorder Scale was used. This checklist identifies and diagnoses students at risk of disabilities and reading difficulties. The obtained data were analyzed using simple linear regression tests, multiple linear regression tests, and multinomial logistic regression in SPSS software version 22 at a significance level of α=0.05.
Results: The research findings showed that executive function (p<0.001; β=0.733) and perception (p<0.001; β=-0.730) had significant effects on children's reading disorder scores. Also, the results of multiple linear regression showed that the dimension of emotional control (from the components of executive performance) with β=0.482 ​​(p<0.001) and the dimensions of sensory integration and auditory perception with values β=-0.201 and β=-0.176 ​​(p=0.009, and p=0.017, respectively) could explain 60.9% of reading learning disorder scores. In other words, among all the research components, the dimensions of emotional control, sensory integration, and auditory perception had the greatest impact on the reading disorder score. In addition, the results of multinomial logistic regression showed that in the low reading disorder group compared to the moderate reading disorder, auditory perception (OR=2.303, p=0.004), sensory integration (p=0.028, OR=2.023), and organization (p= 0.039, OR=0.749) variables, in the high reading disorder group compared to the moderate reading disorder, the auditory perception variable (p=0.042, OR=7.393) and in the low reading disorder group compared to the high reading disorder group, the attention transfer variable (p=0.048, OR=0.327) had significant effects on the odds of having reading disorder.
Conclusion: Based on the results obtained in this research, it can be seen that by reducing executive function injuries and improving children's perceptual skills, the reading disorder score will decrease significantly. Also, among the components of the executive function of the emotional control dimension and the components of perception, the dimensions of sensory integration and auditory perception play a more important role in explaining reading disorders. Therefore, to improve children's reading performance, the level of executive performance and perception in these children should be developed, which ultimately leads to reduced reading disorders in them.

Full-Text [PDF 359 kb]   (242 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Aro T, Eklund K, Eloranta AK, Närhi V, Korhonen E, Ahonen T. Associations between childhood learning disabilities and adult-age mental health problems, lack of education, and unemployment. J Learn Disabil. 2019;52(1):71–83. [DOI]
2. Mayes SD, Calhoun SL. Frequency of reading, math, and writing disabilities in children with clinical disorders. Learn Individ Dif. 2006;16(2):145–57. [DOI]
3. Kalsoom T, Mujahid AH, Zulfqar A. Dyslexia as a learning disability: teachers' perceptions and practices at school level. Bulletin of Education and Research. 2020;42(1):155–66.
4. Peterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. Lancet. 2012;379(9830):1997–2007. [DOI]
5. Seidman LJ, Biederman J, Valera EM, Monuteaux MC, Doyle AE, Faraone SV. Neuropsychological functioning in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with and without learning disabilities. Neuropsychology. 2006;20(2):166–77. [DOI]
6. Costantini A, Ceschi A, Sartori R. Psychosocial Interventions for the enhancement of psychological resources among dyslexic adults: a systematic review. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):7994. [DOI]
7. Benavides-Varela S, Zandonella Callegher C, Fagiolini B, Leo I, Altoè G, Lucangeli D. Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: a meta-analysis. Computers & Education. 2020;157:103953. [DOI]
8. Berkhan M. The Leangains Method. US: Martin Berkhan; 2018.
9. Darweesh AM, Elserogy YM, Khalifa H, Gabra RH, El-Ghafour MA. Psychiatric comorbidity among children and adolescents with dyslexia. Middle East Current Psychiatry. 2020;27(1):28. [DOI]
10. Knight C. The impact of the dyslexia label on academic outlook and aspirations: An analysis using propensity score matching. Br J Educ Psychol. 2021;91(4):1110–26. [DOI]
11. Hung CO. The role of executive function in reading comprehension among beginning readers. Br J Educ Psychol. 2021;91(2):600–16. [DOI]
12. Butterfuss R, Kendeou P. The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review. 2018;30(3):801–26. [DOI]
13. Spencer M, Richmond MC, Cutting LE. Considering the role of executive function in reading comprehension: a structural equation modeling approach. Sci Stud Read. 2020;24(3):179–99. [DOI]
14. Hock MF, Brasseur-Hock IF, Hock AJ, Duvel B. The effects of a comprehensive reading program on reading outcomes for middle school students with disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2017;50(2):195–212. [DOI]
15. Talbott E, Lloyd JW, Tankersley M. Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 1994;17(3):223–32. [DOI]
16. Naderi H, Rostamian M, Naderi F. Perceptual- motor skills training on reading, writing and mathematics skills of students with specific learning disability disorder. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2018;8:107. [Persian] [Article]
17. Shafiei B, Tavakol S, Alinia M, Maracy MR, Sedaghati L, Foroughi R. Developing a screening inventory reading test (IRT) for the Isfahanian students of the first to fifth grade. Audiol. 2009;17(2):53–60. [Persian] [Article]
18. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30(3):607–10. [DOI]
19. Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Test review behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychol. 2000;6(3):235–8. [DOI]
20. Shahabi Z. A comparative study of the executive functions of the brain of primary school students and the determination of the relationship between executive functions and depression, learning, obsessive-compulsive disorder, behavior and inattention-hyperactivity disorders in both sexes [PhD dissertation]. [Tehran, Iran]: Al-Zahra University, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology; 2013. [Persian]
21. Nodei Kh, Sarami Gh, Keramati H. The relation between executive function and working memory capacity and students' reading performance: the role of age, sexand intelligence. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2016;4(3):11–24. [Persian] [Article]
22. Moghbeli M. The effectiveness of strengthening perceptual-motor skills and language development on reducing dyslexia among dyslexic primary school students in Kerman city [Thesis for MSc]. [Anar, Iran]: Islamic Azad University, Anar Branch; 2018. [Persian]
23. Salimi Teymouri B. Investigating the effect of Delacato's neuro-therapeutic method on developmental dyslexia of elementary school girl students in Borujerd city in the academic year 85-86 [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Tarbiat Moalem University; 2007. [Persian]
24. Karimi H, Sabori Gh, Ghasemi A, Nemati Z. Effect of advanced visual- perception frastig test on reading skills in students with specific dyslexia learning disability: a single subject study. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2019;19(3):115-28. [Persian] [Article]
25. Mikaeli F. [Examining the phonological processing model of reading in 8-10-year-old monolingual and bilingual normal and dyslexic students of Tehran and Tabrizi in the academic year of 82-83 (Master Thesis)]. [Tehran]: Kharazmi University; 2005. [Persian]
26. Follmer DJ. Executive function and reading comprehension: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist. 2018;53(1):42–60. [DOI]
27. Polatajko HJ, Kaplan BJ, Wilson BN. Sensory integration treatment for children with learning disabilities: its status 20 years later. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 1992;12(6):323–41. [DOI]
28. Khasawneh MA, Al Ahmad FA, Al Khawaldeh MA. The effects of training program based on auditory perception skills in enhancing phonological awareness among learning disability students in aseer region. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies. 2018;12(3):591. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb