Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 185 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fallahi S, Azmoudeh M, Mesrabadi J, HosseiniNasab S D. Comparing the Effectiveness of Couple Therapy Based on Choice Theory With Spiritual Psychotherapy Based on Forgiveness on Life Expectancy of Women at Risk of Divorce. MEJDS 2022; 12 :185-185
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2879-en.html
Comparing the Effectiveness of Couple Therapy Based on Choice Theory With Spiritual Psychotherapy Based on Forgiveness on Life Expectancy of Women at Risk of Divorce
Shahla Fallahi1 , Masoumeh Azmoudeh *2 , Javad Mesrabadi3 , Seyed Davood HosseiniNasab4
1- PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran
4- Professor, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (914 Views)

Background & Objectives: The most common state in the divorce period is the feeling of hopelessness and despair. Hope is a necessary and fundamental part of life that provides the necessary energy to realize goals and dreams. Counselors have used various packages and techniques in trying to resolve the marital conflicts of couples. One of the suggested approaches to couple therapy in recent years is the choice theory, which was created by Glasser. Reality therapy leads people to reality and effective interaction with all aspects of real life. On the other hand, neglecting psychological treatments based on forgiveness and spiritual and moral values in couple therapy has increased marital problems. Very little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of spiritual psychotherapy treatments based on forgiveness and couple therapy based on choice theory on couples or women facing divorce. So, the present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of couple therapy based on choice theory with spiritual psychotherapy based on forgiveness on the life expectancy of women at risk of divorce.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a two–stage follow–up design with a control group. The statistical population of this study included all women who were referred to the Marivan Dispute Resolution Council in the spring of 2021. Among these couples, 60 eligible women volunteered to enter the study and were randomly divided into experimental (couple therapy based on choice theory and spiritual psychotherapy based on forgiveness) and control groups (each group was 20 persons). The inclusion criteria were as follows: women with at least fifth–grade education, have a divorce case in court, and are willing to cooperate to receive couples therapy intervention. The exclusion criteria were not following the group rules stated in the first session and absenting more than one session in the intervention sessions. Couples in both groups answered the Life Expectancy Questionnaire (Snyder et al., 1991) in four stages of assessment (i.e., pretest, posttest, 1–month follow–up and 3–month follow–up). Couple therapy based on choice theory included 9 group couple therapy sessions in 120–min sessions and one session per week, over a period of 3 months. Forgiveness–based spiritual psychotherapy was performed in nine 60–min sessions. Descriptive statistics methods including mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution were used to describe the data. For inferential statistics, the analysis of variance with repeated measurements, the Chi–square test to compare the demographic characteristics of groups and Bonferroni post hoc test were used to compare the effectiveness in different stages of measurement. Data analysis was done in SPSS version 23. The significance level of the tests was considered 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the effect of the measurement time (p<0.001), the effect of interaction between the measurement time and the group (p<0.001), and the effect of the group (p<0.001) on the mean scores of the life expectancy variable were significant. The mean scores of the life expectancy variable in the couple therapy group based on the choice theory and the spiritual psychotherapy group based on forgiveness were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The mean scores of the life expectancy variable in the couple therapy group based on the choice theory were significantly higher than the spiritual psychotherapy based on forgiveness (p<0.001). In the two experimental groups, there were significant differences in the average scores of the life expectancy variable between the pretest and posttest stages (p<0.001), between the pretest with 1–month follow–up (p<0.001) and 3–month follow–up stages (p<0.001). Also, significant differences were observed in the mean scores of the life expectancy variable between the posttest with 1–month follow–up (p=0.004) and 3–month follow–up stages (p<0.001) and between the 1–month follow–up and 3–month follow–up stages (p=0.004).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, the couple therapy group based on choice theory has a greater effect on increasing the life expectancy of women facing divorce compared to spiritual psychotherapy based on forgiveness.

Keywords: Couple therapy based on choice theory, Spiritual psychotherapy based on forgiveness, Life expectancy, Women at risk of divorce
Full-Text [PDF 582 kb]   (386 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology
References
1. Myers JE, Madathil J, Tingle LR. Marriage satisfaction and wellness in India and the United States: a preliminary comparison of arranged marriages and marriages of choice. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2005;83(2):183–90. [DOI]
2. Waite LJ, Lehrer EL. The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: a comparative analysis. Population & Development Review. 2003;29(2):255–75. [DOI]
3. Amato PR. Research on divorce: continuing trends and new developments. J Marriage Fam. 2010;72(3):650–66. [DOI]
4. Härkönen J. Divorce: trends, patterns, causes, and consequences. In: Treas J, Scott J, Richards M; editors. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to the sociology of families. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
5. Eslami M, Yazdanpanah M, Andalib P, Rahimi A, Safizadeh M, Dadvar A, et al. Development of a questionnaire to measure perceived reasons for divorce seeking: an instrument development study. Electron Physician. 2018;10(7):7071–7. [DOI]
6. Aghajanian A, Thompson V. Recent divorce trend in Iran. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2013;54(2):112–25. [DOI]
7. SHARGH. Az har se ezdevaj yek ezdevaj be talagh monjar mishavad [One out of three marriages leads to divorce]. [Internet]. 2021. https://www.sharghdaily.com/
8. Ubaidi BAA. The psychological and emotional stages of divorce. J Fam Med Dis Prev. 2017;3(3):1–4. [DOI]
9. Niknam M, Hoseinian S. Effectiveness of Fisher’s rebuilding after divorce intervention on self-concept and hope of women after divorce. Quarterly Journal of Psychological Methods and Models. 2021;12(43):70–82. [Persian] [Article]
10. Alizadeh Aghdam MB. Barrasi mizane omid be ayande dar beyne daneshjooyan va avamel moaser bar an [A study of hope in the future among students and its affecting factors]. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2013;23(4):189–206. [Persian]
11. Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–66. [DOI]
12. Alimoradi S, Rafienia P, Sabahi P. Effect of cognitive-behavioral group therapy on the hopeless and loneliness among divorced women. Journal of Research and Health. 2016;6(2):213–21. [Article]
13. Ripley J, Solfelt L, Ord A, Garthe RC, Worthington EL, Channing T. Short- and long-term outcomes of hope focused couple therapy. Spiritual Clin Pract. 2021. [DOI]
14. Snyder CR. Hypothesis: There is hope. In: Snyder CR; editor. Handbook of hope theory, measures & applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. [DOI]
15. Grewal PK, Porter JE. Hope theory: a framework for understanding suicidal action. Death Studies. 2007;31(2):131–54. [DOI]
16. Meadows LA, Kaslow NJ, Thompson MP, Jurkovic GJ. Protective factors against suicide attempt risk among African American women experiencing intimate partner violence. Am J Community Psychol. 2005;36(1–2):109–21. [DOI]
17. Mascaro N, Rosen DH. Assessment of existential meaning and its longitudinal relations with depressive symptoms. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2008;27(6):576–99. [DOI]
18. Khojasteh Mehr R, Parsi E, Shirali Nia Kh. The moderating role of positive emotion on the relationship between negative emotion and destructive marital exchanges in women. Family Psychology. 2015;2(1):49–58. [Persian] [Article]
19. Glasser W. Control theory in the classroom. Perennial Library/Harper & Row Publishers; 1986.
20. Nasr Esfahani N. The effect of choice theory training through group learning method on increasing marital intimacy of women. Journal of Woman & Study of Family. 2010;3(8):105–14. [Persian] [Article]
21. Stoye J. Choice theory when agents can randomize. J Econ Theory. 2015;155:131–51. [DOI]
22. Amiri M, Aghamohammadian Sherbaf HR, Kimiayi A. Asar bakhshiye rooykard vagheiyat darmani gorouhi bar manba kontorol va rahbord haye moghabele’i [Effectiveness of group reality therapy training in the locus of control and coping strategies]. Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2012;6(24):59–68. [Persian]
23. Amani A. The efficacy of reality therapy on marital commitment and self esteem of couples. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2015;5(2):1–23. [Persian] [Article]
24. Arabpour E, Hashemiyan K. The effectiveness of couple therapy via reality therapy method on the improvment of intimacy relations of couples. Educational Psychology Quarterly. 2011;3(1):1–13. [Persian] [Article]
25. Hadi M, Janbozorgi M. Asar bakhshiye darman yekparche tohidi bar moallefe haye shakhsiat va bilini [The effectiveness of monotheistic integrated therapy on personality and clinical components]. Psychology and Religion. 2009;2(2):71–104. [Persian]
26. Hackney CH, Sanders GS. Religiosity and mental health: a meta-analysis of recent studies. J Scientific Study of Religion. 2003;42(1):43–55. [DOI]
27. Shamloo E, Ghasemi M, Rezvani F. The effectiveness of spirituality training in reducing marital conflicts. Journal of Social Work Research. 2019;4(13):95–120. [Persian] [Article]
28. Fincham F, Beach SRH. Forgiveness and marital quality: precursor or consequence in well-established relationships? J Posit Psychol. 2007;2(4):260–8. [DOI]
29. Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20–8. [DOI]
30. Worthington EL, Wade NG. Handbook of forgiveness. London: Routledge; 2019.
31. Gordon KC, Baucom DH, Snyder DK. Treating couples recovering from infidelity: an integrative approach. J Clin Psychol. 2005;61(11):1393–405. [DOI]
32. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2015. [Persian]
33. Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, et al. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(4):570–85. [DOI]
34. Khozaymeh V, Safariyan Tosi MR. Cognitive-behavioral instruction on anxiety and hope of mothers of children with learning disability. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2018;8:118. [Persian] [Article]
35. Kermani Z, Khodapanahi MK, Heydari M. Vizhegi haye ravan sanji moeghyas omid Snyder [Psychometric properties of Snyder Hope Scale]. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012;5(4):7–23. [Persian] [Article]
36. Abbasi H, Ahmadi SA, Fatehizadeh M, Bahrami F. Effect of couple therapy based on the choice theory on social commitment of couples. J Edu Commun Health. 2017;4(2):3–10. [Persian] [DOI]
37. Ghafoori S, Mashhadi A, Hasan Abadi H. The effectiveness of spiritual psychotherapy based on forgiveness in order to increase marital satisfaction and prevent marital conflicts of couples in the city of Mashhad. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2013;15(4):45–57. [Persian] [Article]
38. Worthington, jun. EL. An empathy-humility-commitment model of forgiveness applied within family dyads. J Family Therapy. 1998;20(1):59–76. [DOI]
39. Monsefi S, Ahadi H, Hatami HR. Investigate the effectiveness of supportive group reality therapy on the hope and responsiblity of divorced women of victim of domestic violence. Psychological Science. 2018;17(69):567–74. [Persian] [Article]
40. Ghorbanalipour M, Najafi M, Alirezalou Z, Nasimi M. The effectiveness of reality therapy on happiness and hope in divorced women. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;4(2):297–317.[Persian] [Article]
41. Glasser W. Counseling with choice theory: the new reality therapy. New York: Harper Perennial; Reprint edition; 2001.
42. Wubbolding RE, Brickell J, Imhof L, Kim R, Lojk L, Al-Rashidi B. Reality therapy: a global perspective. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling. 2004;26(3):219–28. [DOI]
43. Boromand R, Sadeghifard M, Samavi SA. The effectiveness of group counseling based on the choice theory on reducing marital conflicts. American Journal of Life Science Researches. 2013;1(1):11–9.
44. Farhadi A, Salehin S, Aghayan S, Keramat A, Talebi S. The effectiveness of reality therapy based on choice theory on marital intimacy and sexual satisfaction of newly married women. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2020;28(2):83–92. [Persian] [DOI]
45. Sedghi M, Ghaffari O, Kazemi R, Narimani M. Comparison of the effectiveness of couple therapy methods in the theory of Choice, acceptance and commitment (ACT), and integrative couple therapy in marital commitment of couples. Journal of Psychological Science. 2019;18(81):1069–80. [Persian] [Article]
46. Rahmanian M, Moein Samadani M, Oraki M. Effect of spirituality therapy on hope of and life style improvement of breath cancer patients. Journal of Applied Counseling. 2017;7(1):101–14. [Persian] [Article]
47. Safara M, Khanbabaee M, Khanbabaee M. The effectiveness of spirituality-based group counseling on purpose in life and personal growth in girls of divorced families. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2020;22(4):203–9. [Persian] [Article]
48. Worthington EL. Steps to REACH Forgiveness and to Reconcile. First edition. Pearson Learning Solutions; 2008.
49. Wade NG, Hoyt WT, Kidwell JEM, Worthington EL. Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(1):154–70. [DOI]
50. McCullough ME, Rachal KC, Sandage SJ, Worthington EL, Brown SW, Hight TL. Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(6):1586–603. [DOI]
51. Worthington EL, Kurusu TA, Collins W, Berry JW, Ripley JS, Baier SN. Forgiving usually takes time: a lesson learned by studying interventions to promote forgiveness. J Psychol Theol. 2000;28(1):3–20. [DOI]
52. Worthington EL. Forgiveness and reconciliation: theory and application. London: Routledge; 2013. [DOI]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb