Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 222 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Eskanderpour M, Beliad M R, Geyanbagheri M, Tajeri B, Sabet M. The Structural Model of the Relationship Between Ambiguity Intolerance and Mental Health Symptoms With the Mediation of Health Anxiety in Female Caregivers of Alzheimer Patients. MEJDS 2022; 12 :222-222
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2980-en.html
1- PhD Student in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Psychology Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3- Assistant Professor of Psychology Department, Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rudehen, Iran
Abstract:   (771 Views)

Background & Objectives: Dementia or Alzheimer, a major neuro–cognitive disorder, is characterized by significant cognitive decline. Caring for Alzheimer patients is one of the most challenging types of care and leads to a decrease in the "mental health" of caregivers. Many caregivers of patients sometimes experience anxiety related to their health. Mental health is affected by different factors, such as ambiguity intolerance, a tendency arising from negative beliefs about ambiguity or uncertainty and its consequences and implications, which is an essential predictor of anxiety and mental health. Caregivers of Alzheimer patients may experience varying degrees of ambiguity due to their patient's physical condition, which makes them prone to physical and mental problems. The present study aimed to explain the structural pattern of the relationship between ambiguity intolerance and mental health symptoms with the mediation role of health anxiety in female caregivers of Alzheimer patients.
Methods: The research method was analytical correlational. The statistical population of this research included all the female caregivers of Alzheimer patients referred to the Alzheimer Association in Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. Of them, 320 people were selected voluntarily. The inclusion criteria were female gender, age over 25 years, history of caring for a patient with Alzheimer disease for more than one year, no simultaneous use of psychiatric drugs and psychotherapy, and no chronic physical diseases and hospitalization. By contacting the researcher after being fully informed about the research objectives, volunteers in the study sent their details and a manuscript to review the inclusion criteria and declare informed consent. Symptom Check List–90–Revised (Derogatis et al., 1976), Ambiguity Tolerance Scale–II (McLain, 2009), and Health Anxiety Questionnaire (Salkovskis et al. 2002) were used to collect data. Structural equation model and SPSS–24 and AMOS–24 software, and a significance level equal to 0.05 were used for data analysis.
Results: The present study showed that the hypothesized model had fitness with the collected data (χ2=70.63, χ2/df=1.91, CFI=0.975, GFI=0.943, AGFI=0.898, and RMSEA=0.067). In the present study, the direct path coefficient between ambiguity intolerance and mental health (p=0.001, β=0.250), the direct path coefficient between health anxiety and mental health (p=0.019, β=0.136), and the direct path coefficient between ambiguity intolerance and health anxiety (p=0.001, β=0.241) was positive and significant. In the present study, the indirect path coefficient between ambiguity intolerance and mental health was positive and significant (p=0.043, β=0.032).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, health anxiety mediates the relationship between ambiguity intolerance and mental health in caregivers of Alzheimer patients. It is suggested that to increase the mental health caused by caring for Alzheimer patients, training courses should be held to focus on health anxiety and ambiguity intolerance in them.


Full-Text [PDF 681 kb]   (339 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2. Plascencia-Villa G, Perry G. Alzheimer’s disease pharmacology. In: Kenakin T; editor. Comprehensive pharmacology. Elsevier; 2022. [DOI]
3. Mahdavi B, Fallahi Khoshknab M, Mohammadi F, Hosseini MA. The effect of group spiritual care on quality of life in family caregivers of elders with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2015;4(3):34–42. [Persian] [Article]
4. Bezprozvanny I. Alzheimer’s disease – where do we go from here? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;633:72–6. [DOI]
5. Zehtab S, Tabatabaeinejad FT. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on psychological well-being and quality of life in caregivers of the elderly with alzheimer’s disease in isfahan city: a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2022;21(2):187–206. [Persian] [DOI]
6. Rahbari S, Riahi l, Tabibi SJ. Comparison of mental health services in Iran and selected countries. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2018;7(3):10–8. [Persian] [Article]
7. Rahmani S, Mohamadpour S, Tajikzade F. Mediating role of concern in the relationship between uncertainty of intolerance and illness perception with mental health in cancer patients. J Anesth Pain. 2018;8(4):10–23. [Persian] [Article]
8. Britton GI, Neale SE, Davey GCL. The effect of worrying on intolerance of uncertainty and positive and negative beliefs about worry. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019;62:65–71. [DOI]
9. Chen S, Yao N, Qian M. The influence of uncertainty and intolerance of uncertainty on anxiety. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018;61:60–5. [DOI]
10. Osmanağaoğlu N, Creswell C, Dodd HF. Intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and worry in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:80–90. [DOI]
11. Borkovec TD, Ray WJ, Stober J. Worry: a cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to affective, physiological, and interpersonal behavioral processes. Cognit Ther Res. 1998;22(6):561–76. [DOI]
12. Khodayarifard M, Mansouri A, Besharat MA, Gholamali Lavasani M. A review of conceptual models for worry and generalized anxiety disorder. Clin Exc. 2017;6(2):23–38. [Persian] [Article]
13. Hedari Shams J, Ali Mohammadzadeh K, Maher A. Correlation between health literacy and quality of life with health anxiety in outpatient patients referred to Shahid Beheshti specialized polyclinic in Karaj. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2020;9(1):1–9. [Persian] [Article]
14. Mohamadkhani Shali E, Alipor A, Hasanzadeh Pashang S. Effect of cognitive therapy training in groups on health anxiety among nursing students. Pars Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;11(2):45–52. [Persian] [DOI]
15. Rezaei S, Darabi A, Rahnedjat AM. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy on decreasing health anxiety. Ebnesina. 2018;20(2):61–7. [Persian] [Article]
16. Thielsch C, Andor T, Ehring T. Metacognitions, intolerance of uncertainty and worry: an investigation in adolescents. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;74:94–8. [DOI]
17. Davey GC, Wells A. Worry and its psychological disorders: theory, assessment and treatment. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006.
18. Alizadeh A, Hasanzadeh L, Mahmoud Alilou M, Poursharifi H. Prediction of worry based on behavioral activation and inhibition systems (BAS/BIS), cognitive emotion regulation strategies andintolerance of uncertainty in students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2014;2(3):1–11. [Persian] [Article]
19. Aftab R, Shams A. Relationship between integrated self-knowledge and resilience with anxiety of being infected by covid-19: the mediating role of intolerance of ambiguity, worry, and physical activity. Sport Psychology Studies. 2020;9(32):201–26. [Persian] [Article]
20. Ren LL, Wang YM, Wu ZQ, Xiang ZC, Guo L, Xu T, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a descriptive study. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1015–24. [DOI]
21. Vander Haegen M, Etienne AM. Cognitive processes across anxiety disorders related to intolerance of uncertainty: clinical review. Cogent Psychology. 2016;3(1):1215773. [DOI]
22. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2016.
23. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1976;128(3):280–9. [DOI]
24. Anisi J, Babaei S, Barani M, Mohammadlo H, Ebrahimi F. Determine the psychometric properties by Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) among military forces . EBNESINA 2016;17(4):13-8. [Article]
25. Akhavan Abiri F, Shairi MR. Validity and reliability of symptom Checklist–90–Revised (SCL–90–R) and Brief Symptom Inventory–53 (BSI–53). Clinical Psychology & Personality. 2019;17(2):169–95. [Persian] [Article]
26. McLain DL. Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: the Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale–II (MSTAT–II). Psychol Rep. 2009;105(3):975–88. [DOI]
27. Babaei A, Maktabi G, Behrozi N, Atashafroz A. The impact of successful intelligence on students' critical thinking and tolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2016;18(Special Issue):379–86. [Persian] [Article]
28. Salkovskis PM, Rimes KA, Warwick HMC, Clark DM. The Health Anxiety Inventory: development and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychol Med. 2002;32(5):843–53. [DOI]
29. Nargesi F, Izadi F. Kariminejad K, Rezaii Sharif A. The investigation of the reliability and validity of Persian version of health anxiety questionnaire in students of Lorestan University of medical sciences. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2017;7(27):147–60. [Persian] [Article]
30. Karimi J, Homayuni Najafabadi A, Homayuni Najafabadi F. Arzeshyabi vizhegi haye ravan sanji porsesh name ezterab salamat [Evaluation of psychometric properties of the health anxiety inventory print]. Hakim Health Systems Research Journal. 2015;17(4):297–307. [Persian]
31. Razurel C, Kaiser B, Antonietti JP, Epiney M, Sellenet C. Relationship between perceived perinatal stress and depressive symptoms, anxiety, and parental self-efficacy in primiparous mothers and the role of social support. Women Health. 2017;57(2):154–72. [DOI]
32. Asadi S, Abedini M, Poursharifi H, Nikokar M. The Relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and rumination with worry on student population. Clinical Psychology. 2013;4(4):83–92. [Persian] [Article]
33. Oglesby ME, Schmidt NB. The role of threat level and intolerance of uncertainty (IU) in anxiety: an experimental test of IU theory. Behav Ther. 2017;48(4):427–34. [DOI]
34. Kertz S, Woodruff-Borden J. The role of metacognition, intolerance of uncertainty, and negative problem orientation in children’s worry. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2013;41(2):243–8. [DOI]
35. Esnaashari S, Mohammadkhani S, Hassanabadi H. Cognitive model of anxiety in cancer patients: the role of cognitive and metacognitive components. Health Psychology. 2017;6(21):66–85. [Persian] [Article]
36. Dugas MJ, Savard P, Gaudet A, Turcotte J, Laugesen N, Robichaud M, et al. Can the components of a cognitive model predict the severity of generalized anxiety disorder? Behav Ther. 2007;38(2):169–78. [DOI]
37. Dugas MJ, Schwartz A, Francis K. Brief report: intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and depression. Cogn Ther Res. 2004;28(6):835–42. [DOI]
38. Yook K, Kim KH, Suh SY, Lee KS. Intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and rumination in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. J Anxiety Disord. 2010;24(6):623–8. [DOI]
39. Lee AH, Woodruff-Borden J. Roles of emotional reactivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and negative problem orientation on developing childhood worry. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;135:25–30. [DOI]
40. Forouzanfar A. Distress tolerance: theory, mechanism and relation to psychopathology. Rooyesh. 2017;6(2):239–62. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb