Identification of Predisposing, Underlying, and Contextual Factors, Strategies, and Consequences of Marital Infidelity in Yazd City, Iran Using a Qualitative and Grounded Approach

Ghaem Mohammadi, Seyed Mohammad Rera; Rezapoor Mirsaleh, Yaser; Arianpoor, Hamid Reza

Volume 13 - Articles-1402 MEJDS (2023) 13: 69 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Ghaem Mohammadi S M R, Rezapoor Mirsaleh Y, Arianpoor H R. Identification of Predisposing, Underlying, and Contextual Factors, Strategies, and Consequences of Marital Infidelity in Yazd City, Iran Using a Qualitative and Grounded Approach. MEJDS 2023; 13 :69-69
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3016-en.html

Identification of Predisposing, Underlying, and Contextual Factors, Strategies, and Consequences of Marital Infidelity in Yazd City, Iran Using a Qualitative and Grounded Approach

Seyed Mohammad Rera Ghaem Mohammadi¹

, Yaser Rezapoor Mirsaleh ^*²

, Hamid Reza Arianpoor³

1- PhD Student in Counseling, Department of Psychology and Counseling, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Yazd, Ardakan, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Yazd, Ardakan, Iran

Abstract: (829 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Extramarital relationships are among the most traumatic challenges in married life, which can cause severe disruption and even collapse the marital relationship. A qualitative and phenomenological approach can effectively explain this phenomenon since marital infidelity involves individual, social, and cultural dimensions. The present research attempted to comprehensively understand the factors contributing to and predicting marital affairs using a qualitative and content analysis approach. The current study used a qualitative approach and grounded theory to identify the factors involved in the background, strategies, and consequences of marital infidelity in Yazd City, Iran.
Methods: This study was conducted using a qualitative approach from March 2021 to March 2022. All couples whose cases were brought up in the Yazd Court of Justice due to extramarital relations and then referred to family counseling centers were included in the study. Sampling was carried out using snowball and semi–structured interview methods. The research samples were selected by purposive sampling and continued until the theoretical saturation limit was reached. After performing 15 interviews, data saturation was achieved. To analyze the data, we used axial coding.
Results: According to the results, 26.66% of the participants were male and 73.33% were female. The mean age of the participants was 32.06 years. Their mean duration of marriage was 8.26 years. About 20% of the participants had no children, and 80% had children. Infidelity was committed by the wife in 53.33% of cases and by the husband in 46.66% of cases. According to this study, the predisposing factors of marital infidelity were personality traits, sexual deviation, failure to meet needs and deficiencies. The research subjects also stated that spouse's mental disorders, cynicism, lying, jealousy, fear, irresponsibility, seeking diversity, loneliness, and lack of self–control are some of the characteristics that play a role in infidelity.
The contextual factors of marital infidelity in Yazd included communication, norm–breaking, and role modeling. Communication from the perspective of the study subjects refers to inappropriate communication between spouses and, in the next stage, points to the number of contacts of the cheating person with others. The contacts can occur at work, during drug use, or through virtual networks. Another factor raised by people was norm–breaking, which included domestic violence, addiction, concealment, and ogling. This study also showed that the underlying factors of marital infidelity were background, marriage, and existential inferiority.
Regarding the underlying causes of infidelity, important factors were childhood experience, witnessing arguments between parents, and having sexual experiences before marriage. The second underlying factor was marriage. In this regard, it was found that differences between couples in terms of religious beliefs, education level, and compulsive marriages were underlying factors of marital infidelity. Existential inferiority means that a person feels invisible and insignificant and tries to prove himself/herself to others differently. Its subcategories were comparing the spouse with others and humiliating the spouse.
Conclusion: According to the research results, marital infidelity is a cultural phenomenon that should be investigated in social and cultural contexts. These findings suggest that marital infidelity is not a one–dimensional phenomenon, and various factors, such as a person's personality, relationships, deficiencies as well as breaking norms in the family, modeling of other people, sexual deviations, background, existential inferiority, and type of marriage are involved in marital infidelity.

Keywords: Predisposing factors, Marital infidelity, Qualitative approach

Full-Text [PDF 640 kb] (353 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References

1. Amato PR, Previti D. People's reasons for divorcing: gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. J Fam Issues. 2003;24(5):602–26. [DOI]

2. Starratt VG, Weekes-Shackelford V, Shackelford TK. Mate value both positively and negatively predicts intentions to commit an infidelity. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;104:18–22. [DOI]

3. Shrout MR, Weigel DJ. "Should I stay or should I go?" understanding the noninvolved partner's decision-making process following infidelity. J Soc Pers Relat. 2019;36(2):400–20. [DOI]

4. Shrout MR, Weigel DJ. Infidelity's aftermath: appraisals, mental health, and health-compromising behaviors following a partner's infidelity. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018;35(8):1067–91. [DOI]

5. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press; 2000.

6. Shackelford TK, LeBlanc GJ, Drass E. Emotional reactions to infidelity. Cogn Emot. 2000;14(5):643–59. [DOI]

7. Birnbaum GE, Mizrahi M, Kovler L, Shutzman B, Aloni-Soroker A, Reis HT. Our fragile relationships: relationship threat and its effect on the allure of alternative mates. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(3):703–13. [DOI]

8. Pasha-Zaidi N, Afari E, Sevi B, Urganci B, Durham J. Responsibility of learning: a cross-cultural examination of the relationship of grit, motivational belief and self-regulation among college students in the US, UAE and Turkey. Learning Environ Res. 2019;22(1):83–100. [DOI]

9. Zhang Y, Wang X, Pan S. Prevalence and patterns of extramarital sex among Chinese men and women: 2000–2015. J Sex Res. 2021;58(1):41–50. [DOI]

10. Isanejad O, Baghery A. Phenomenology of strategies of justifying infidelity: mechanisms to cope with cognitive dissonance of marital infidelity. Journal of Family Counseling & Psychotherapy. 2017;6(2):189–207. [Persian] [Article]

11. Fincham FD, May RW. Infidelity in romantic relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:70–4. [DOI]

12. Altgelt EE, Reyes MA, French JE, Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Who is sexually faithful? own and partner personality traits as predictors of infidelity. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018;35(4):600–14. [DOI]

13. Allen MS, Robson DA. Personality and sexual orientation: new data and meta-analysis. J Sex Res. 2020;57(8):953–65. [DOI]

14. Sevi B, Urganci B, Sakman E. Who cheats? an examination of light and dark personality traits as predictors of infidelity. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;164:110126. [DOI]

15. Whisman MA, Snyder DK. Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(2):147–54. [DOI]

16. Whisman MA, Gordon KC, Chatav Y. Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(2):320–4. [DOI]

17. Graham SM, Negash S, Lambert NM, Fincham FD. Problem drinking and extradyadic sex in young adult romantic relationships. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2016;35(2):152–70. [DOI]

18. Weiser DA, Weigel DJ, Lalasz CB, Evans WP. Family background and propensity to engage in infidelity. J Fam Issues. 2017;38(15):2083–101. [DOI]

19. Malekasgar S, Mazaheri MA, Fata L, Mootabi F, Heydari M. Schema therapists views about the role of schema component in marital infidelity: a qualitative study. Journal of Family Research. 2020;16(2):199–216. [Persian] [Article]

20. Abzug R. Extramarital affairs as occupational hazard: a structural, ethical (cultural) model of opportunity. Sexualities. 2016;19(1–2):25–45. [DOI]

21. Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Jacobson NS. Understanding infidelity: correlates in a national random sample. J Fam Psychol. 2001;15(4):735–49. [DOI]

22. Brooks TJ, Monaco K. Your cheatin' heart: joint production, joint consumption and the likelihood of extramarital sex. Appl Econ Lett. 2013;20(3):272–5. [DOI]

23. Allen ES, Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Snyder DK, Gordon KC, Glass SP. Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2005;12(2):101–30. [DOI]

24. Amani A, Khalegh Panah K, Mohamadi A. Lived experience of betrayed women in marital relationship in Sanandaj. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2020;9(2):255–72. [Persian] [Article]

25. Rasoulzadeh Aghdam S, Kheyrjou E, Abbasi V. Phenomenology of women's life experience of male's (spouse) infidelity behaviors. The Women and Families Cultural-Educational. 2021;16(55):49–81.[Persian] [Article]

26. Fathi M, Parvin,S Javadian SR. Comparing the causes of infidelity in marital relationships among men and women: a qualitative research. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2016;5(4):401–18. [Persian]

27. Brown EM. Patterns of infidelity and their treatment. Second edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2013.

28. Shirdel M. The tendency factors of married men and women to sexual unlawful relationship. Refah J. 2006;6(22):133–48. [Persian] [Article]

29. Bagarozzi DA. Understanding and treating marital infidelity: a multidimensional model. Am J Fam Ther. 2007;36(1):1–17. [DOI]

30. Shrier LA, Blood EA. Momentary desire for sexual intercourse and momentary emotional intimacy associated with perceived relationship quality and physical intimacy in heterosexual emerging adult couples. J Sex Res. 2016;53(8):968–78. [DOI]

31. Tajbakhsh G, Hosseini M, Mohammad Mirzaei M. Data analysis of the foundation of the process of formation of marital infidelity. Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research. 2021;9(17):51–72. [Persian] [Article]

32. Habibi Asgarabad M, Hajiheydari Z. A qualitative study for investigating the reasons of sexual infidelity of couples who have asked for divorce in family court. Journal of Family Research. 2015;11(42):165–86. [Persian] [Article]

33. Avani MS, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. Investigation on the reasons and backgrounds of women's extramarital relations from men's perspective: a grounded theory. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2020;10(1):125–50. [Persian] [Article]

34. Hosseini SM, Aslani K, Attari YA. Identification of effective conditions on infidelity among married men: a grounded theory study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2019;8(2):44–56. [Persian] [Article]

35. Zhinapour M, Baharluoei M. Escaping the marital life poor circuit: Exploring the meaning and process of infidelity formation. lranian Journal of Social Problems. 2020;10(2):179–200. [Persian] [Article]

36. Afshari Kashanian O, Zahrakar K, Mohsen Zadeh F, Tajik Esmaili AA. Detection of predisposing factors in women marital infidelity. Journal of counseling research. 2019;18(71):121–54. [Persian] [Article]

37. Alitabar SH, Ghanbari S, Zadeh Mohammadi A, Habibi M. The relationship between premarital sex and attitudes toward infidelity. Journal of Family Research. 2014;10(2):255–67. [Persian] [Article]

38. Enayat Gholampour M, Abdollahzadeh H, Amirshahi M, Sanagoo A. Relationship between personality traits, early maladaptive patterns, optimism and pessimism with justification of infidelity in married couples. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2017;5(2):8–14. [Persian] [Article]

39. Ahmadi Ardakani Z, Zarei Mahmoud Abadi H, Kalateh Sadati A. Qualitative analysis of the underlying factors for extramarital relationships in women experiencing extramarital relationships: a qualitative study. Journal of Counseling Research. 2022;20(80):5–34. [Persian] [Article]