Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 127 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dorostkar S, Hassanzadeh S, Vakili S, Ghasemzadeh S. Studying the Effectiveness of the Mother-Centered Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Package Specific for 4-6 Years Old Children With Externalizing Disorders on Improving Parent-Child Interaction. MEJDS 2023; 13 :127-127
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3081-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology and Children with Exceptional Education, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Psychology Group, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Children with Exceptional Education, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Psychology Group, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (790 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Externalizing disorders are common in children and appear in preschool and school ages. The disorders include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Conduct Disorder (CD), and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), whose symptoms have a negative impact on the interaction between children and parents. One of the effective and well–known treatments to reduce children's behavioral problems is cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT). This therapy is one of the extensive non–medicinal approaches. It is essential to intervene with children with externalizing disorders as early as possible before their maladaptive behaviors become increasingly stable and destructive. Education should start with mothers because of the parent's role, especially mothers, who interact and communicate most with children. The present study investigated the effectiveness of a package of cognitive–behavioral interventions centered on mothers with children with externalizing problems in improving child–parent interaction.
Methods: This quasi–experimental study employed a pretest–posttest and a two–month follow–up design with a control group. The study subjects were 30 mothers with children with externalizing problems who were chosen by convenience sampling. Then, they were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The research tools were the Parent–Child Relationship Scale (PCRS) (Pianta et al., 1997) and mother–centered cognitive–behavioral intervention (CBT). The program was implemented in two main stages, including the main framework of cognitive behavioral therapy and the combination of this framework with the behavioral characteristics of children and the problems of mothers with children with externalizing behavioral disorders. The experimental group received CBT intervention for twelve 120–minute sessions, but the control group did not receive any intervention. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage) were used to describe the obtained data. For data analysis, analysis of variance with repeated measurements and post hoc Bonferroni test were used. All analyses were done using SPSS version 24 software. The significance level of statistical tests was considered 0.050.
Results: The results showed that the group effect, the time effect, and the interaction effect of time and group on the variables of conflict and dependence and positive relationship were significant (p<0.05). In the experimental group, in the variables of conflict and dependence, the average scores of the posttest and follow–up stages were significantly reduced compared to the average scores of the pretest stage (p<0.001). Also, in the variables of conflict (p=1.000) and dependence (p=0.323), the difference between the scores of the posttest and follow–up in the intervention group was not significantly different, indicating the stability of the treatment effects over time. In the experimental group, in the positive relationship variable, the average scores of the posttest and follow–up stages increased significantly compared to the average scores of the pretest stage (p<0.001). Also, the difference between the scores of the posttest and the scores of the follow–up in the intervention group was not significant, indicating the stability of the treatment effects over time (p=0.319). However, in the control group, in the mentioned variables, the difference between the scores of the pretest stage and the scores of the posttest and follow–up stages was not significant (p>0.05)
Conclusion: According to the research findings, the mother–based cognitive behavior intervention (CBT) effectively improves the parent–child relationship. This therapy, as an effective and beneficial intervention, is suggested for families with children with externalizing disorders.

Full-Text [PDF 610 kb]   (311 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Battagliese G, Caccetta M, Luppino OI, Baglioni C, Cardi V, Mancini F, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for externalizing disorders: A meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness. Behav Res Ther. 2015;75:60–71. [DOI]
2. Riise EN, Wergeland GJH, Njardvik U, Öst LG. Cognitive behavior therapy for externalizing disorders in children and adolescents in routine clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;83:101954. [DOI]
3. DuPaul GJ, Morgan PL, Farkas G, Hillemeier MM, Maczuga S. Academic and social functioning associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: latent class analyses of trajectories from kindergarten to fifth grade. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016;44(7):1425–38. [DOI]
4. Franke B, Michelini G, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Bilbow A, Buitelaar JK, et al. Live fast, die young? a review on the developmental trajectories of ADHD across the lifespan. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;28(10):1059–88. [DOI]
5. Scott JG, Giørtz Pedersen M, Erskine HE, Bikic A, Demontis D, McGrath JJ, et al. Mortality in individuals with disruptive behavior disorders diagnosed by specialist services – a nationwide cohort study. Psychiatry Res. 2017;251:255–60. [DOI]
6. Sörberg Wallin A, Koupil I, Gustafsson JE, Zammit S, Allebeck P, Falkstedt D. Academic performance, externalizing disorders and depression: 26,000 adolescents followed into adulthood. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019;54(8):977–86. [DOI]
7. Buist KL, Verhoeven M, Hoksbergen R, Ter Laak J, Watve S, Paranjpe A. Associations of perceived sibling and parent-child relationship quality with internalizing and externalizing problems: comparing indian and dutch early adolescents. J Early Adolesc. 2017;37(8):1163–90. [DOI]
8. Lochman JE, Powell NP, Boxmeyer CL, Jimenez-Camargo L. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for externalizing disorders in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011;20(2):305–18. [DOI]
9. Dodge KA. Do social information-processing patterns mediate aggressive behavior? In: Lahey BB, Moffitt TE, Caspi A; editors. auses of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.
10. Kendall PC. Guiding theory for therapy with children and adolescents. In: Kendall PC; editor. Child and adolescent therapy: cognitive-behavioral procedures. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
11. Sukhodolsky DG, Kassinove H, Gorman BS. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 2004;9(3):247–69. [DOI]
12. Sukhodolsky DG, Wyk BCV, Eilbott JA, McCauley SA, Ibrahim K, Crowley MJ, et al. Neural mechanisms of cognitive-behavioral therapy for aggression in children and adolescents: design of a randomized controlled trial within the national institute for mental health research domain criteria construct of frustrative non-reward. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016;26(1):38–48. [DOI]
13. Podell JL, Kendall PC. Mothers and fathers in family cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious youth. J Child Fam Stud. 2011;20(2):182–95. [DOI]
14. Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. [DOI]
15. Sanders MR, McFarland M. Treatment of depressed mothers with disruptive children: a controlled evaluation of cognitive behavioral family intervention. Behav Ther. 2000;31(1):89–112. [DOI]
16. Wood JJ, Piacentini JC, Southam-Gerow M, Chu BC, Sigman M. Family cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45(3):314–21. [DOI]
17. Pianta RC, Nimetz SL, Bennett E. Mother-child relationships, teacher-child relationships, and school outcomes in preschool and kindergarten. Early Child Res Q. 1997;12(3):263–80. [DOI]
18. Abareshi Z, Tahmasian K, Mazaheri M, Panaghi L. The impact of psychosocial child development training program, done through improvement of mother-child interaction, on parental self-efficacy and relationship between mother and child under three. Journal of Research in Psychological Health. 2009;3(3):49–58. [Persian] [Article]
19. Gaviţa OA, David D, Bujoreanu S, Tiba A, Ionuţiu DR. The efficacy of a short cognitive–behavioral parent program in the treatment of externalizing behavior disorders in Romanian foster care children: building parental emotion-regulation through unconditional self- and child-acceptance strategies. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34(7):1290–7. [DOI]
20. Sukhodolsky DG, Smith SD, McCauley SA, Ibrahim K, Piasecka JB. Behavioral interventions for anger, irritability, and aggression in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016;26(1):58–64. [DOI]
21. Daryabeigi M, Pourmohamdreza-Tajrishi M, Dolatshahi B, Bakhshi E. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on internalizing problems of children with externalizing disorders. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation. 2020;18(2):193–202. [Persian] [DOI]
22. Benner GJ, Nelson JR, Sanders EA, Ralston NC. Behavior intervention for students with externalizing behavior problems: primary-level standard protocol. Except Child. 2012;78(2):181–98. [DOI]
23. Lochman JE, Boxmeyer CL, Jones S, Qu L, Ewoldsen D, Nelson WM. Testing the feasibility of a briefer school-based preventive intervention with aggressive children: a hybrid intervention with face-to-face and internet components. J Sch Psychol. 2017;62:33–50. [DOI]
24. Masi G, Milone A, Paciello M, Lenzi F, Muratori P, Manfredi A, et al. Efficacy of a multimodal treatment for disruptive behavior disorders in children and adolescents: focus on internalizing problems. Psychiatry Res. 2014;219(3):617–24. [DOI]
25. Eyberg SM, Nelson MM, Boggs SR. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008;37(1):215–37. [DOI]
26. Reyno SM, McGrath PJ. Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problems – a meta‐analytic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47(1):99–111. [DOI]
27. Atzaba-Poria N, Deater-Deckard K, Bell MA. It takes more than one for parenting: how do maternal temperament and child's problem behaviors relate to maternal parenting behavior? Pers Individ Dif. 2014;69:81–6. [DOI]
28. Lochman JE, Matthys W. The Wiley handbook of disruptive and impulse-control disorders. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018.
29. Leijten P, Melendez-Torres GJ, Eradus M, Overbeek G. Specificity of parenting program component effects: relational, behavioral, and cognitive approaches to children's conduct problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022;61(3):458–60. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb