Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 151 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: ۱۱۷۴۸۶۳۰۹۸۰۰۴۵۰۱۳۹۹۱۶۲۲۷۲۷۸۴
Ethics code: IR.IAU.RASHT.REC.1400.040

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karimian Z, Akbari B, Asadi Majreh S. Determining the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on the Substance Use Tendency and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation of Patients Addicted to Opiates. MEJDS 2023; 13 :151-151
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3251-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (709 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Opioid addiction has become a global concern in recent years. It is estimated that 26.8 million people worldwide have an opioid use disorder. In addition, there are more than 100000 opioid overdose deaths each year. Over time, repeated use of addictive substances activates neural pathways related to reward processing, and the individuals become sensitive and conditioned to the symptoms associated with substance use. As a result, exposure to drug–related cues stimulates a person's mental craving. Also, studies report a high rate of psychological problems in drug users, such as difficulties in emotion regulation. One of the treatments recommended today in the field of substance abuse is acceptance and commitment therapy. Studies have shown the effectiveness of this treatment in reducing the substance use tendency and the difficulties in emotion regulation of people addicted to opioids. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy on substance use tendencies and the difficulties in emotion regulation of patients addicted to opiates.
Methods: The present quasi–experimental study employed a pretest–posttest and a two–month follow–up design with a control group. The study's statistical population included all people with drug abuse who were referred to addiction treatment centers in Rasht City, Iran, in 2021. A sample of 30 qualified volunteers was included in the study by cluster random sampling and divided into the intervention and control groups. Data were collected using the addiction potential scale (Weed et al., 1992) and difficulties in emotion regulation scale (Gratz & Roemer, 2004). The "addiction acknowledgment" scale was used to measure the simultaneous criterion validity of the "addiction potential" scale, and the correlation was reported as 0.75. Also, the test–retest reliability values were 0.69 in men and 0.77 in women. Furthermore, six subscales were identified in the measurement of construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis in Gertz and Romer's study. Also, reliability was obtained by calculating the Cronbach alpha coefficient in subscales, which was found between 0.85 and 0.89. The "acceptance and commitment therapy" intervention was performed on the experimental group for 12 90–minute sessions once a week. The control group did not undergo any psychotherapy at the same time. After administering the posttest and follow–up, the research data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test in the SPSS23 software (α=0.05).
Results: The group*time interaction effect in the analysis of variance was significant for the variables of substance use tendency and difficulties in emotion regulation (p<0.05). These results indicate that the control and experimental groups differed substantially in the pretest, posttest, and follow–up phases. The findings showed that in the pretest, there was no difference between the acceptance and commitment therapy group and the control group in the score of substance use tendency (p>0.05). Therefore, the two groups were similar. In the posttest, a significant difference was found between the acceptance and commitment therapy group and the control group in the substance use tendency score (p<0.05). This finding implies that the acceptance and commitment therapy outperformed the control group in decreasing the substance use tendency of patients to opiates. In the pretest, there was no difference in the difficulties in emotion regulation between the acceptance and commitment therapy group and the control group (p>0.05). Therefore, the two groups were similar. In the posttest, a significant difference was found between the acceptance and commitment therapy group and the control group in the difficulties in emotion regulation score (p<0.05). This finding implies that the acceptance and commitment therapy outperformed the control group in decreasing difficulties in emotion regulation of patients addicted to opiates. Finally, at the follow–up, all changes were still stable in the experimental group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: acceptance and commitment therapy is effective on the substance use tendency and the difficulties in emotion regulation of patients addicted to opiates. It is suggested that addiction therapists use the above method to improve and prevent relapse of patients with opiates.

Full-Text [PDF 750 kb]   (369 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Zhang J, Song C, Dai J, Li L, Yang X, Chen Z. Mechanism of opioid addiction and its intervention therapy: Focusing on the reward circuitry and mu‐opioid receptor. MedComm. 2022;3(3):e148. [DOI]
2. Tirandaz S, Akbari B. The effects of group schema therapy on early maladaptive schemes and psychological adjustment in females with substance abuse. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2021;11:98. [Persian] [Article]
3. Reichl D, Enewoldsen N, Weisel KK, Saur S, Fuhrmann L, Lang C, et al. Lower emotion regulation competencies mediate the association between impulsivity and craving during alcohol withdrawal treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(4):649–55. [DOI]
4. Prashad S, Hammonds RP, Wiese AL, Milligan AL, Filbey FM. Sex-related differences in subjective, but not neural, cue-elicited craving response in heavy cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;209:107931. [DOI]
5. Parisi A, Landicho HL, Hudak J, Leknes S, Froeliger B, Garland EL. Emotional distress and pain catastrophizing predict cue-elicited opioid craving among chronic pain patients on long-term opioid therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022;233:109361. [DOI]
6. Nohtani A, Arab A, Sanagouye Moharer G. The effects of mindfulness training on craving and emotion regulation in individuals under methadone maintenance treatment. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2021;11:154. [Persian] [Article]
7. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54. [DOI]
8. Lee EB, An W, Levin ME, Twohig MP. An initial meta-analysis of acceptance and commitment therapy for treating substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;155:1–7. [DOI]
9. Byrne SP, Haber P, Baillie A, Costa DSJ, Fogliati V, Morley K. Systematic reviews of mindfulness and acceptance and commitment therapy for alcohol use disorder: should we be using third wave therapies? Alcohol Alcohol. 2019;54(2):159–66. [DOI]
10. Gul M, Aqeel M. Acceptance and commitment therapy for treatment of stigma and shame in substance use disorders: a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. J Subst Use. 2021;26(4):413–9. [DOI]
11. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies – republished article. Behav Ther. 2016;47(6):869–85. [DOI]
12. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25. [DOI]
13. De Groot F, Morrens M, Dom G. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and addiction: a literature review. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(9):577–85.
14. Gholizadeh B, Ghamari Givi H, Sadri Damirchi E. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive flexibility and craving in substance-dependent individuals. Etiadpajohi. 2021;15(59):205–26. [Persian] [DOI]
15. Arjmand Ghujur K, Mahmood-Aliloo M, Khanjani Z, Bakhshipour A. Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Reduction of Craving and lapse in Methamphetamine Addict Patients. Health Psychology. 2020;8(32):41–56. [Persian] [Article]
16. Osaji J, Ojimba C, Ahmed S. The use of acceptance and commitment therapy in substance use disorders: a review of literature. J Clin Med Res. 2020;12(10):629–33. [DOI]
17. Spidel A, Lecomte T, Kealy D, Daigneault I. Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis and trauma: Improvement in psychiatric symptoms, emotion regulation, and treatment compliance following a brief group intervention. Psychol Psychother. 2018;91(2):248–61. [DOI]
18. Khanjani MS, Kazemi J, Younesi J, Dadkhah A, Biglarian A, Ebrahimi Barmi B. The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on psychological flexibility and emotional regulation in patients with spinal cord injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2021;15(2): e105378. [DOI]
19. Mohammadi L, Salehzade Abarghoei M, Nasirian M. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive emotion regulation in men under methadone treatment. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2015;23(9):853–61. [Persian] [Article]
20. Bayazidi S, Bakhshipour A, Alivandi Vafa M. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based treatment (ACT) on improving emotion regulation strategy for people with gastrointestinal and skin disorders. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2022;12:10. [Persian] [Article]
21. Lanza PV, García PF, Lamelas FR, González‐Menéndez A. Acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of substance use disorder with incarcerated women. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70(7):644–57. [DOI]
22. Moradinazar M, Najafi F, Jalilian F, Pasdar Y, Hamzeh B, Shakiba E, et al. Prevalence of drug use, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and measure of socioeconomic-related inequalities of drug use among Iranian people: findings from a national survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15(1):39. [DOI]
23. Weed NC, Butcher JN, McKenna T, Ben-Porath YS. New measures for assessing alcohol and drug abuse with the MMPI-2: the APS and AAS. J Pers Assess. 1992;58(2):389–404. [DOI]
24. Minooee M. Assessment of the scientific validity, reliability and normalization of APS, AAS and MAC-R tests for spotting vulnerable individuals exposed to drug abuse among the male high school students in the city of Tehran. Etiadpajohi. 2003;1(3):77–108. [Persian] [Article]
25. Besharat MA. Emotion regulation difficulty scale. Thoughts & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2018;13(47):89–92. [Persian] [Article]
26. Hayes SC, Wilson KG, Gifford EV, Bissett R, Piasecki M, Batten SV, et al. A preliminary trial of twelve-step facilitation and acceptance and commitment therapy with polysubstance-abusing methadone-maintained opiate addicts. Behav Ther. 2004;35(4):667–88. [DOI]
27. Peyman S, Askari M, Samavi SA, Amirfkhraee A. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on adaptive and maladaptive strategies of cognitive emotion regulation in methadone maintenance addicts. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2022. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb