Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 161 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jahanshahlo G, Rabiei Nezhad M R, Asadi M. The Effect of Neurofeedback Treatment on Improving Dictation Disorder in Third Grade Elementary School Male Students. MEJDS 2022; 12 :161-161
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-864-en.html
1- MA Student General Psychology, Islamic Azad University of Takestan, Qazvin, Iran
2- PhD in Educational psychology, Shahid Rajaei Pardise of Farhangyan University of Qazvin, Iran
3- PhD in Guidance and Counseling, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (970 Views)

Background & Objectives: Learning disability is one of the most common disorders among children and refers to the child's problems in obtaining skills like reading, writing, and mathematics compared to peers with the same intellectual ability. Disorder of written expression includes components such as spelling, handwriting, and writing. The most common component of writing disorder is poor spelling. The spelling skill (dictation) is the ability to substitute correct letters for sounds. Many children with a learning disability have difficulty linking sound and symbols or form associated with them. They cannot convert the sounds they hear into letters and words. In recent years, neuroscience has faced a new advancement called neurofeedback. Neurofeedback is a type of biofeedback that involves the central nervous system rather than the autonomous nervous system to examine the brain’s electrical activity. This tool is used to change the function of the brain by changing the brain wave pattern. It is very important to employ new methods in therapeutic and developmental interventions to help students with dictation disorder. Therefore, the present study aimed at introducing the neurofeedback treatment as an effective method for treating the disorder in male students in elementary school, 3rd grade.
Methods: The present study is an applied study in terms of objectives, with a single-subject AB design. In this regard, the baseline of the dependent variables was measured (Step A) during the multiple phases before the intervention, and then the intervention was applied (Step B). The statistical population of the study included all the students with the disorder of learning disabilities in the elementary schools, 3rd grade in the city of Abyek, during the Academic year September 2016 – June 2017. Five samples were selected by availability sampling in the center for learning disabilities. The data collection tools were: 1. Diagnostic interview based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) with parents. 2. Wechsler Intelligence Test for children. 3. Research-made dictation test. 4. Neurofeedback system. The samples were selected according to the inclusion criteria: 1) Fulfilling the manual's diagnostic Criteria. 2) No drug consumption. 3) Studying in the 3rd grade, elementary education with 9 years old. 4) With an IQ of higher than 90 based on the IQ Wechsler scale. 5) Physical health. After that, their parents came to the school for therapeutic intervention and gave their informed consent in written form. In the next step, a diagnostic interview was conducted with the parents. Once the conditions have been met, an initial assessment was carried out (the baseline data were collected in 3 dictation sessions). One week after the baseline phase, the children participated in electroencephalography recordings. And, the treatment phase began with the pattern of brain waves (decrease in standard beta activity and increase in theta spectrum). The treatment protocol used was based on increasing beta waves and decreasing theta waves at the regions OZ and CZ. The sessions were held twice a week, including a 45-minute neurofeedback treatment and a 15-minute dictation test. The dictation test was taken every other two sessions, and there were 7 tests in total during the treatment phase that lasted 10 weeks. The method of visual analysis of charts was employed for the data analysis, and Cohen's d effect size (1998) was used to calculate the effect size. The method of visual analysis of charts was employed for the data analysis, and Cohen's d effect size (1998) was used to calculate the effect size.
Results: According to the data obtained, the changes or the Cohen’s d effect size (baseline - treatment) was -2.95, which indicated the significant effect of the neurofeedback treatment on the spelling disorder.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that neurofeedback is effective in regulating brain activity for treating dictation disorder in children. In the present study, the treatment protocol that focused on decreasing theta waves and increasing beta waves at the regions CZ and OZ resulted in the treatment of the disorder.

Full-Text [PDF 573 kb]   (330 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P. (Synopsis of Psychiatry Behavioral Sciences/ Clinical Psychiatry). Rezaee F. (Persian translator). Eleventh edition. Tehran: Arjmand; 2015, pp: 462-478.
2. Berninger VW. Understanding the graphia in developmental dysgraphia: A developmental neuropsychological perspective for disorders in producing written language In Dewey D & Tupper D (Eds.), Developmental motor disorders: A neuropsychological perspective. New York: Guilford Press. 2004, pp: 189-233.
3. Aslani T. Effectiveness of Cognitive- Behavior Training to parents on Dictation Dis0rder and Deiay in Doing Homeworks: Case Study. Journal of Exceptional Education. 2016;140 (3) :60-70. [ Persian] [Article]
4. Demos JN. Getting started with neurofeedback. Azerangi D, Rahmanian. (Persian translators). Second edition. Tehran: Danzhe. 2016.
5. Breteler MH, Arns M, Peters S, Giepmans I, Verhoeven L. Improvements in spelling after QEEG-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: A randomized controlled treatment study. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. 2010 Mar;35(1):5-11.
6. Thornton KE, Carmody DP. Electroencephalogram biofeedback for reading disability and traumatic brain injury. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics. 2005 Jan 1;14(1):137-62. [DOI]
7. Becerra J, Fernandez T, Harmony T, Caballero MI, Garcia F, Fernandez-Bouzas A, et al. Follow-up study of learning-disabled children treated with neurofeedback or placebo. Clinical EEG and neuroscience. 2006 Jul;37(3):198-203. [DOI]
8. Sadeghi N, Nazari MA, Alizade M, Kamali M. The effect of neurofeedback training on EEG and balance performance in children with reading disorder. Journal of Novin Scientific and Research. 2012; 7 (3). [Persian] [Article]
9. Harandi V, Moghadam N. A comparison of the effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) training method and fernald’s multisensory approach on dictation performance among students suffering from dictation disorder (Dysgraphia). Focus on Sciences. 2017;3(1):1-6. [Persian]
10. Graham S, Harris KR, Larsen L. Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2001 May;16(2):74-84. [DOI]
11. American Psyhiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Rezaee F, Fakhraee A, Farmand A, Niloufari A, HashemiAzar J, ShamlooF. (Persian translators). Fifth Edition. Tehran: Arjmand; 2014, pp:108-16.
12. Sadeghi A, Rabiee M, Abedi MR. Validation and reliability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV. Journal of Ravanshenasie Novin. 2011; 7 (28): 377-86. [Persian]
13. Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ, Dean P. Developmental dyslexia: the cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends in neurosciences. 2001 Sep 1;24(9):508-11. [DOI]
14. Fonseca LC, Tedrus GM, Chiodi MG, Cerqueira JN, Tonelotto JM. Quantitative EEG in children with learning disabilities: analysis of band power. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2006;64:376-81. [DOI]
15. Tabrizi M. Disability of Dictation Diagnosis & Treatment. Tehran: Fararavan Publishing; 2014. [Persian]
16. Jafarie Nadoshen A, Bidaky R, Jafarie Nadoshen Z, Mirhoseini H, SsberieHoseinabad M, Karimi M. Effectiveness of neurofeedback on reducing dyslexia and dictation disorder symptoms in students with ADHD. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2016; 3 (3) : 60-68. [Persian] [Article]
17. Rossiter T. Neurofeedback for AD/HD: A ratio feedback case study and tutorial. Journal of Neurotherapy. 2002 Jun 1;6(3):9-35. [DOI]
18. Walker JE, Norman CA. The neurophysiology of dyslexia: A selective review with implications for neurofeedback remediation and results of treatment in twelve consecutive patients. Journal of Neurotherapy. 2006 Dec 12;10(1):45-55.
19. Tansey MA. Wechsler (wisc‐r) changes following treatment of learning disabilities via eeg biofeedback raining in a private practice setting. Australian Journal of Psychology. 1991 Dec;43(3):147-53. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb